Reversed mobilization in referendum campaigns: How positive news framing can mobilize the skeptics

International Journal of Press/Politics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 40-66

  Schuck, Andreas R T ^a   De Vreese, Claes H ^a  

^a Amsterdam School of Midwifery   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Mobilization; News framing; Prospect theory; Referendum campaign; Turnout

Indexed keywords

EID: 57949087297     PISSN: 19401612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1940161208326926     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Aarts, K., and H. van der Kolk. 2006. "Understanding the Dutch 'No': The Euro, the East and the Elite." PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (2). 243-46.
2. Alvarez, M. 1997. Information and Elections. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
3. American Association for Public Opinion Research (AAPOR). 2006. Standard Definitions: Final Disposition of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys. Lenexa, KS: AAPOR.
4. Ansolabehere, S., S. Iyengar, A. Simon, and N. Valentino. 1994. " Does Attack Advertising Demobilize the Electorate ?" American Political Science Review 88 (4). 829-38.
5. Baden, C., and C. de Vreese. 2008. " Making Sense: A Reconstruction of People's Understandings of the European Constitutional Referendum in the Netherlands." Communications 33: 117-45.
6. Bandura, A. 1997. Self Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman.
7. Brunetti, A. 1997. "Der 'Status quo Bias'und die bremsende Wirkung des fakultativen Referendums." In Wieviel direkte Demokratie vertraCurrency signgt die Schweiz? Chur: Verlag Ra1/4egger, ed. S. Borner and H. Rentsch, 167-82.
8. Cappella, J., and K. Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of Cynicism. The Press and the Public Good. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Chaffee, S., and J. Schleuder. 1986. " Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News." Human Communication Research 13 (1). 76-107.
10. Christin, T., S. Hug, and P. Sciarini. 2002. " Interests and Information in Referendum Voting: An Analysis of Swiss Voters." European Journal of Political Research 41: 759-76.
11. Cox, G., and M. Munger. 1989. "Closeness, Expenditures, and Turnout in the 1982 U.S. House Elections." American Political Science Review 83 (1). 217-31.
12. Dawson, P., and J. Zinser. 1976. "Political Finance and Participation in Congressional Elections." Annals of the American Academy of Political and Sociological Science 425: 59-73.
13. de Vreese, C. 2004. "The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluations and Policy Support: A Two-Wave Experiment." Mass Communication and Society 7(2): 191-215.
14. de Vreese, C., S. Banducci, H. Semetko, and H. Boomgaarden. 2006. "The News Coverage of the 2004 European Parliamentary Election Campaign in 25 Countries." European Union Politics 7 (4). 477-504.
15. de Vreese, C. and M. Tobiasen 2007. "Conflict and identity. Explaining turnout and anti-integrationist voting in the Danish 2004 elections for the European Parliament." Scandinavian Political Studies 30 (1). 87-111
16. de Vreese, C., and H. Semetko. 2002. "Cynical and Engaged: Strategic Campaign Coverage, Public Opinion and Mobilization in a Referendum." Communication Research 29 (6). 615-41.
17. de Vreese, C., and H. Semetko. 2004. Political Campaigning in Referendums. Framing the Referendum Issue. New York: Routledge.
18. Ditto, P., and D. Lopez. 1992. " Motivated Skepticism: Use of Differential Decision Criteria for Preferred and Nonpreferred Conclusions." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (4). 568-84.
19. Domke, D., D. Shah, and D. Wackman. 1998. "'Moral Referendums': Values, News Media and the Process of Candidate Choice." Political Communication 15: 301-21.
20. Dreyer Lassen, D. 2005. "The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment." American Journal of Political Science 49 (1). 103-18.
21. Dunlop, S., M. Wakefield, and Y. Kashima. 2008. "Can You Feel It? Negative Emotion, Risk, and Narrative in Health Communication." Media Psychology 11 (1). 52-75.
22. European Commission. 2004 a. Eurobarometer 61. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
23. European Commission. 2004 b. Eurobarometer 62. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
24. European Commission. 2005 a. Eurobarometer 63.4. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
25. European Commission. 2005 b. Eurobarometer Special 214. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
26. European Commission. 2005 c. Flash Eurobarometer 172. Brussels: DG Press and Communication, European Commission.
27. Finkel, S., and J. Geer. 1998. " A Spot Check: Casting Doubt on the Demobilizing Effect of Attack Advertising." American Journal of Political Science 42 (2). 573-95.
28. Fiske, S. 1980. " Attention and Weight in Person Perception: The Impact of Negative and Extreme Behaviour." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 889-906.
29. Franklin, M. 2002. " Learning from the Danish Case: A Comment on Palle Svensson's Critique of the Franklin Thesis." European Journal of Political Research 41 (6). 751-58.
30. Franklin, M., M. Marsh, and C. Wlezien. 1994. " Attitudes toward Europe and Referendum Votes: A Response to Siune and Svensson." Electoral Studies 13: 117-21.
31. Geys, B. 2006. " Explaining Voter Turnout: A Review of Aggregate-Level Research." Electoral Studies 25 (4). 637-63.
32. Glencross, A., and A. Trechsel. 2007. "First or Second Order Referendums? Understanding the Votes on the EU Constitutional Treaty in Four EU Member States." Paper presented at the annual meetings of the European Consortium of Political Research (ECPR), Pisa, Italy.
33. Goldstein, K., and P. Freedman. 2002. " Campaign Advertising and Voter Turnout: New Evidence for a Stimulation Effect." Journal of Politics 64 (3). 721-40.
34. Granberg, D., and S. Holmberg. 1991. "Self-Reported Turnout and Voter Validation." American Journal of Political Science 35: 448-59.
35. Hastings, J., T. Kane, D. Staiger, and J. Weinstein. 2007. " The Effect of Randomized School Admissions on Voter Participation." Journal of Public Economics 91: 915-37.
36. Hobolt, S.B. 2005. " When Europe Matters: The Impact of Political Information on Voting Behaviour in EU Referendums." Journal of Elections, Public Opinion, and Parties 15 (1). 85-110.
37. Hobolt, S.B. 2006. " How Parties Affect Vote Choice in European Integration Referendums." Party Politics 12 (5). 623-47.
38. Ingberman, D. 1985. " Running against the Status Quo: Institutions for Direct Democracy Referenda and Allocations over Time." Public Choice 46 (1). 19-44.
39. Iyengar, S. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible? How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40. Jenssen, A., P. Pesonen, and M. Gilljam, eds. 1998. To Join or Not to Join: Three Nordic Referendums on Membership in the European Union. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
41. Kahn, K., and P. Kenney. 1999. " Do Negative Campaigns Mobilize or Suppress Turnout? Clarifying the Relationship between Negativity and Participation." American Political Science Review 93 (4). 877-89.
42. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. " Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk." Econometrics 47: 111-32.
43. Kalichman, S., and B. Coley. 1995. "Context Framing to Enhance HIV-Antibody-Testing Messages Targeted to African American Women." Health Psychology 14 (3). 247-54.
44. Kepplinger, H., and H. Weissbecker. 1991. " NegativitaCurrency signt als Nachrichtenideologie." Publizistik 36 (3). 330-42.
45. Key, V. 1966. The Responsible Electorate. New York: Random House.
46. KirchgaCurrency signssner, G., and T. Schulz. 2005. "Expected Closeness or Mobilisation: Why Do Voters Go to the Polls? Empirical results for Switzerland, 1981-1999." CESifo working paper series no. 1387.
47. Kleinnijenhuis, J., J. Takens, and W. van Atteveldt. 2005. "Toen Europa de dagbladen ging vullen." In Nederlanders en Europa: Het referendum over de Europese Grondwet, ed. K. Aarts and H. van der Kolk. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
48. Kriesi, H. 2006. " Role of the Political Elite in Swiss Direct-Democratic Votes." Party Politics 12 (5). 599-622.
49. Lau, R. 1982. " Negativity in Political Perception." Political Behavior 4 (4). 353-77.
50. Lau, R. 1985. " Two Explanations for Negative Effects in Political Behavior." Journal of Political Science 29: 119-38.
51. Lau, R., L. Sigelman, and I.B. Rovner. 2007. "The Effects of Negative Political Campaigns: A Meta-Analytic Reassessment." Journal of Politics 69 (4). 1176-1209.
52. LeDuc, L. 2002. " Opinion Change and Voting Behaviour in Referendums." European Journal of Political Research 41: 711-32.
53. Lubbers, M. 2008. "Regarding the Dutch 'Nee' to the European Constitution. A Test of the Identity, Utilitarian and Political Approaches to Voting 'No.'" European Union Politics 9 (1). 59-86.
54. Magleby, D. 1989. " Opinion Formation and Opinion Change in Ballot Proposition Campaigns." In Manipulating Public Opinion, ed. M. Margolis and G.A. Mauser. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
55. Marcus, G., W. Neuman, and M. MacKuen. 2000. Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Markowski, R., and J. Tucker. 2005. "Pocketbooks, Politics, and Parties: The 2003 Polish Referendum on EU Membership." Electoral Studies 24: 409-33.
57. Martin, P. 2004. " Inside the Black Box of Negative Campaign Effects: Three Reasons Why Negative Campaigns Mobilize." Political Psychology 25 (4). 545-62.
58. Martin, P. 2008. " The Mass Media as Sentinel: Why Bad News about Issues Is Good News for Participation." Political Communication 25 (2). 180-93.
59. Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. " 'Mediatization' of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy ?" Political Communication 16: 247-61.
60. Meffert, M., S. Chung, A. Joiner, L. Waks, and J. Garst. 2006. " The Effects of Negativity and Motivated Information Processing during a Political Campaign." Journal of Communication 56: 27-51.
61. Miller, J., and J. Krosnick. 2004. " Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment." Political Psychology 25 (4). 507-23.
62. Miller, J., J. Krosnick, A. Holbrook, and L. Lowe. 2006. "The Impact of Policy Change Threat on Financial Contributions to Interest Groups." Unpublished manuscript.
63. Mokken, R. 1971. A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis with Applications in Political Research. The Hague, the Netherlands: Mouton.
64. Morton, T., and J. Duck. 2001. " Communication and Health Beliefs: Mass and Interpersonal Influences on Perceptions of Risk to Self and Others." Communication Research 28: 602-26.
65. Newton, K. 1999. " Mass Media Effects: Mobilization or Video Malaise ?" British Journal of Political Science 29 (4). 577-99.
66. Niven, D. 2006. " A Field Experiment on the Effects of Negative Campaign Mail on Voter Turnout in a Municipal Election." Political Research Quarterly 59 (2). 203-10.
67. Patterson, T. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Knopf.
68. Pratto, F., and O. John. 1991. " Automatic Vigilance: The Attention-Grabbing Power of Negative Social Information." Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 380-91.
69. Price, V., D. Tewksbury, and E. Powers. 1997. " Switching Trains of Thoughts: The Impact of News Frames on Readers' Cognitive Responses." Communication Research 24 (5). 481-506.
70. Raghubir, P., and G. Menon. 2001. " Framing Effects in Risk Perception of AIDS." Marketing Letters 12 (2). 145-55.
71. Rimal, R., and K. Real. 2003. " Perceived Risk and Efficacy Beliefs as Motivators of Change." Human Communication Research 29 (3). 370-99.
72. Romer, T., and H. Rosenthal. 1979. "Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo." Public Choice 33: 27-44.
73. Rothman, A., and P. Salovey. 1997. " Shaping Perceptions to Motivate Healthy Behaviour: The Role of Message Framing." Psychological Bulletin 121: 3-19.
74. Schmitt-Beck, R., and D. Farrell. 2002. "Do Political Campaigns Matter?" In Do Political Campaigns Matter? Campaign Effects in Elections and Referendums, ed. D. Farrell and R. Schmitt-Beck. London: Routledge.
75. Schneider, T., P. Salovey, A. Apanovitch, J. Pizarro, D. McCarthy, J. Zullo, and A.J. Rothman. 2001. "The Effects of Message Framing and Ethnic Targeting on Mammography Use among Low-Income Women." Health Psychology 20: 256-66.
76. Schuck, A., and C. de Vreese. 2008. "The Dutch No to the EU Constitution: Assessing the role of EU skepticism and the campaign." Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 18 (1). 101-128.
77. Schuck, A., and C. de Vreese. 2006. " Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and Its Effect of Public Support for EU Enlargement." European Journal of Communication 21 (1). 5-32.
78. Sigelman, L., and M. Kugler. 2003. " Why Is Research on the Effects of Negative Campaigning so Inconclusive? Understanding Citizens' Perceptions of Negativity." Journal of Politics 65 (1). 142-60.
79. Slater, M. 2004. " Operationalizing and Analysing Exposure: The Foundation of Media Effects Research." Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81 (1). 168-83.
80. Slothuus, R. 2008. " More Than Weighting Cognitive Importance: A Dual-Process Model of Issue Framing Effects." Political Psychology 29 (1). 1-28.
81. Szczerbiak, A., and P. Taggart. 2004. " The Politics of European Referendum Outcomes and Turnout: Two Models." West European Politics 27 (4). 557-83.
82. Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. " The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice." Science 211: 453-58.
83. Valentino, N., M. Beckmann, and T. Buhr. 2001. " A Spiral of Cynicism for Some: The Contingent Effects of Campaign News Frames on Participation and Confidence in Government." Political Communication 18: 347-67.
84. Valkenburg, P., H. Semetko, and C. de Vreese. 1999. " The Effects of News Frames on Readers' Thoughts and Recall." Communication Research 26 (5). 550-69.
85. Verba, S., K. Lehman Schlozman, and H. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
86. Wattenberg, M., and C. Brians. 1999. " Negative Campaign Advertising: Demobilizer or Mobilizer ?" American Political Science Review 93 (4). 891-900.
87. Zaller, J.R. 1996. " The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea." In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, ed. D.C. Mutz, P.M. Sniderman, and R.M. Brody, 17-78. Chicago: Chicago University Press.