Contribution of Stochastic Partitioning at Human Embryonic Stem Cell Division to NANOG Heterogeneity

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Wu, Jincheng ^a   Tzanakakis, Emmanuel S ^a,b,c,d  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

^b University at Buffalo SUNY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEMECOLCINE; NOCODAZOLE; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG;

ARTICLE; CELL CULTURE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL GROWTH; CELL LINEAGE; CELL POPULATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL RENEWAL; CELL SEPARATION; CELL SIZE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; G2 PHASE CELL CYCLE CHECKPOINT; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MITOSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; POPULATION BALANCE EQUATION MODEL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN POLYMORPHISM; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL DIVISION; CELL SIZE; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; G2 PHASE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC HETEROGENEITY; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84870588109     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0050715     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL, Vega VB, Zhang WW, et al. (2006) The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 38: 431-440.
2. Rodda DJ, Chew JL, Lim LH, Loh YH, Wang B, et al. (2005) Transcriptional regulation of nanog by OCT4 and SOX2. J Biol Chem 280: 24731-24737.
3. Chazaud C, Yamanaka Y, Pawson T, Rossant J, (2006) Early lineage segregation between epiblast and primitive endoderm in mouse blastocysts through the Grb2-MAPK pathway. Dev Cell 10: 615-624.
4. Singh AM, Hamazaki T, Hankowski KE, Terada N, (2007) A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 25: 2534-2542.
5. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D, Nichols J, Nijmeijer B, et al. (2007) Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 450: 1230-1234.
6. Hough SR, Laslett AL, Grimmond SB, Kolle G, Pera MF, (2009) A continuum of cell states spans pluripotency and lineage commitment in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 4: e7708.
7. Enver T, Soneji S, Joshi C, Brown J, Iborra F, et al. (2005) Cellular differentiation hierarchies in normal and culture-adapted human embryonic stem cells. Hum Mol Genet 14: 3129-3140.
8. Hayashi K, Lopes SM, Tang F, Surani MA, (2008) Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states. Cell Stem Cell 3: 391-401.
9. Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Murakami K, Takahashi K, Niwa H, (2008) Identification and characterization of subpopulations in undifferentiated ES cell culture. Development 135: 909-918.
10. Stewart MH, Bosse M, Chadwick K, Menendez P, Bendall SC, et al. (2006) Clonal isolation of hESCs reveals heterogeneity within the pluripotent stem cell compartment. Nat Methods 3: 807-815.
11. Diamandis P, Wildenhain J, Clarke ID, Sacher AG, Graham J, et al. (2007) Chemical genetics reveals a complex functional ground state of neural stem cells. Nat Chem Biol 3: 268-273.
12. Barker N, van Es JH, Kuipers J, Kujala P, van den Born M, et al. (2007) Identification of stem cells in small intestine and colon by marker gene Lgr5. Nature 449: 1003-1007.
13. Sangiorgi E, Capecchi MR, (2008) Bmi1 is expressed in vivo in intestinal stem cells. Nat Genet 40: 915-920.
14. Dykstra B, Kent D, Bowie M, McCaffrey L, Hamilton M, et al. (2007) Long-term propagation of distinct hematopoietic differentiation programs in vivo. Cell Stem Cell 1: 218-229.
15. Osorno R, Chambers I, (2011) Transcription factor heterogeneity and epiblast pluripotency. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366: 2230-2237.
16. Theunissen TW, Silva JC, (2011) Switching on pluripotency: a perspective on the biological requirement of Nanog. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 366: 2222-2229.
17. Narsinh KH, Sun N, Sanchez-Freire V, Lee AS, Almeida P, et al. (2011) Single cell transcriptional profiling reveals heterogeneity of human induced pluripotent stem cells. J Clin Invest 121: 1217-1221.
18. Trott J, Hayashi K, Surani A, Babu MM, Martinez-Arias A, (2012) Dissecting ensemble networks in ES cell populations reveals micro-heterogeneity underlying pluripotency. Mol BioSyst 8: 744-752.
19. Ivanova N, Dobrin R, Lu R, Kotenko I, Levorse J, et al. (2006) Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 442: 533-538.
20. Hyslop L, Stojkovic M, Armstrong L, Walter T, Stojkovic P, et al. (2005) Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages. Stem Cells 23: 1035-1043.
21. Kalmar T, Lim C, Hayward P, Munoz-Descalzo S, Nichols J, et al. (2009) Regulated fluctuations in nanog expression mediate cell fate decisions in embryonic stem cells. PLoS Biol 7: e1000149.
22. Glauche I, Herberg M, Roeder I, (2010) Nanog variability and pluripotency regulation of embryonic stem cells-insights from a mathematical model analysis. PLoS ONE 5: e11238.
23. Kaern M, Elston TC, Blake WJ, Collins JJ, (2005) Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet 6: 451-464.
24. Raj A, van Oudenaarden A, (2008) Nature, nurture, or chance: stochastic gene expression and its consequences. Cell 135: 216-226.
25. Enver T, Pera M, Peterson C, Andrews PW, (2009) Stem cell states, fates, and the rules of attraction. Cell Stem Cell 4: 387-397.
26. Filipczyk AA, Laslett AL, Mummery C, Pera MF, (2007) Differentiation is coupled to changes in the cell cycle regulatory apparatus of human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res 1: 45-60.
27. Ezzet F, Mull R, Karbwang J, (1998) Population pharmacokinetics and therapeutic response of CGP 56697 (artemether+benflumetol) in malaria patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 46: 553-561.
28. Neganova I, Zhang X, Atkinson S, Lako M, (2009) Expression and functional analysis of G1 to S regulatory components reveals an important role for CDK2 in cell cycle regulation in human embryonic stem cells. Oncogene 28: 20-30.
29. Becker KA, Ghule PN, Therrien JA, Lian JB, Stein JL, et al. (2006) Self-renewal of human embryonic stem cells is supported by a shortened G1 cell cycle phase. J Cell Physiol 209: 883-893.
30. Zhang X, Neganova I, Przyborski S, Yang C, Cooke M, et al. (2009) A role for NANOG in G1 to S transition in human embryonic stem cells through direct binding of CDK6 and CDC25A. J Cell Biol 184: 67-82.
31. Mittag A, Tarnok A, (2009) Basics of standardization and calibration in cytometry- a review. J Biophotonics 2: 470-481.
32. Shah BH, Borwanker JD, Ramkrishna D, (1976) Monte-Carlo Simulation of Microbial-Population Growth. Math Biosci 31: 1-23.
33. Gillespie DT, (1975) Exact Method for Numerically Simulating Stochastic Coalescence Process in a Cloud. J Atmos Sci 32: 1977-1989.
34. Gillespie DT, (1976) General Method for Numerically Simulating Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical-Reactions. J Comput Phys 22: 403-434.
35. Ramkrishna D (2000) Population Balances: Theory and Applications to Particulate Systems in Engineering: Academic Press. 380 p.
36. Kloeden PE, Platen E (1999) Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations. New York: Springer. 636 p.
37. Lin YL, Lee K, Matsoukas T, (2002) Solution of the population balance equation using constant-number Monte Carlo. Chem Eng Sci 57: 2241-2252.
38. Anderson EC, Petersen DF, Tobey RA, (1970) Density invariance of cultured Chinese hamster cells with stage of the mitotic cycle. Biophys J 10: 630-645.
39. Loken MR, Kubitschek HE, (1984) Constancy of cell buoyant density for cultured murine cells. J Cell Physiol 118: 22-26.
40. Tzur A, Kafri R, LeBleu VS, Lahav G, Kirschner MW, (2009) Cell growth and size homeostasis in proliferating animal cells. Science 325: 167-171.
41. Mantzaris NV, Liou JJ, Daoutidis P, Srienc F, (1999) Numerical solution of a mass structured cell population balance model in an environment of changing substrate concentration. J Biotechnol 71: 157-174.
42. Eakman AGF, Tsuchiya HM, (1966) Statistics and dynamics of microbal cell populations Chem Eng Prog Symp Series, No 69. 62: 37-49.
43. Tomer A, Harker LA, Burstein SA, (1988) Flow cytometric analysis of normal human megakaryocytes. Blood 71: 1244-1252.
44. Mullaney PF, Dean PN, (1970) The small angle light scattering of biological cells. Theoretical considerations. Biophys J 10: 764-772.
45. Tzur A, Moore JK, Jorgensen P, Shapiro HM, Kirschner MW, (2011) Optimizing optical flow cytometry for cell volume-based sorting and analysis. PLoS ONE 6: e16053.
46. Nelder JA, Mead R, (1965) A Simplex-Method for Function Minimization. Comput J 7: 308-313.
47. Fredrickson AG, Ramkrishna D, Tsuchiya HM, (1967) Statistics and dynamics of procaryotic cell populations. Math Biosci 1: 327-374.
48. Rao CV, Wolf DM, Arkin AP, (2002) Control, exploitation and tolerance of intracellular noise. Nature 420: 231-237.
49. Wilkinson DJ, (2009) Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems. Nat Rev Genet 10: 122-133.
50. Werbowetski-Ogilvie TE, Bosse M, Stewart M, Schnerch A, Ramos-Mejia V, et al. (2009) Characterization of human embryonic stem cells with features of neoplastic progression. Nat Biotechnol 27: 91-97.
51. Ghule PN, Becker KA, Harper JW, Lian JB, Stein JL, et al. (2007) Cell cycle dependent phosphorylation and subnuclear organization of the histone gene regulator p220(NPAT) in human embryonic stem cells. J Cell Physiol 213: 9-17.
52. Swain PS, Elowitz MB, Siggia ED, (2002) Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99: 12795-12800.
53. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS, (2002) Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science 297: 1183-1186.
54. Raser JM, O'Shea EK, (2004) Control of stochasticity in eukaryotic gene expression. Science 304: 1811-1814.
55. Arias AM, Hayward P, (2006) Filtering transcriptional noise during development: concepts and mechanisms. Nat Rev Genet 7: 34-44.
56. Chang HH, Hemberg M, Barahona M, Ingber DE, Huang S, (2008) Transcriptome-wide noise controls lineage choice in mammalian progenitor cells. Nature 453: 544-547.
57. Hoffmann M, Chang HH, Huang S, Ingber DE, Loeffler M, et al. (2008) Noise-Driven Stem Cell and Progenitor Population Dynamics. PLoS ONE 3.
58. Losick R, Desplan C, (2008) Stochasticity and cell fate. Science 320: 65-68.
59. MacArthur BD, Ma'ayan A, Lemischka IR, (2009) Systems biology of stem cell fate and cellular reprogramming. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 10: 672-681.
60. Eden E, Geva-Zatorsky N, Issaeva I, Cohen A, Dekel E, et al. (2011) Proteome half-life dynamics in living human cells. Science 331: 764-768.
61. Huh D, Paulsson J, (2011) Non-genetic heterogeneity from stochastic partitioning at cell division. Nat Genet 43: 95-U32.
62. Niwa H, Miyazaki J, Smith AG, (2000) Quantitative expression of Oct-3/4 defines differentiation, dedifferentiation or self-renewal of ES cells. Nat Genet 24: 372-376.
63. Orford KW, Scadden DT, (2008) Deconstructing stem cell self-renewal: genetic insights into cell-cycle regulation. Nat Rev Genet 9: 115-128.
64. Becker KA, Stein JL, Lian JB, van Wijnen AJ, Stein GS, (2010) Human embryonic stem cells are pre-mitotically committed to self-renewal and acquire a lengthened G1 phase upon lineage programming. J Cell Physiol 222: 103-110.
65. Kallas A, Pook M, Maimets M, Zimmermann K, Maimets T, (2011) Nocodazole treatment decreases expression of pluripotency markers Nanog and Oct4 in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 6: e19114.
66. Wang R, Guo YL, (2012) Transient inhibition of cell proliferation does not compromise self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Exp Cell Res 318: 2094-2104.
67. Fischer Y, Ganic E, Ameri J, Xian X, Johannesson M, et al. (2010) NANOG reporter cell lines generated by gene targeting in human embryonic stem cells. PLoS ONE 5.
68. Srienc F, (1999) Cytometric data as the basis for rigorous models of cell population dynamics. J Biotechnol 71: 233-238.
69. Cai L, Friedman N, Xie XS, (2006) Stochastic protein expression in individual cells at the single molecule level. Nature 440: 358-362.
70. Miyanari Y, Torres-Padilla ME, (2012) Control of ground-state pluripotency by allelic regulation of Nanog. Nature 483: 470-473.
71. Pisu M, Concas A, Cao G, (2007) A novel simulation model for stem cells differentiation. J Biotechnol 130: 171-182.
72. Hanna J, Saha K, Pando B, van Zon J, Lengner CJ, et al. (2009) Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration. Nature 462: 595-601.
73. Mantzaris NV, Daoutidis P, (2004) Cell population balance modeling and control in continuous bioreactors. J Process Contr 14: 775-784.
74. Mantzaris NV, Daoutidis P, Srienc F, (2001) Numerical solution of multi-variable cell population balance models: I. Finite difference methods. Comput Chem Eng 25: 1411-1440.
75. Mantzaris NV, Daoutidis P, Srienc F, (2001) Numerical solution of multi-variable cell population balance models. III. Finite element methods. Comput Chem Eng 25: 1463-1481.
76. Pinto MA, Immanuel CD, Doyle FJ, (2007) A feasible solution technique for higher-dimensional population balance models. Comput Chem Eng 31: 1242-1256.
77. Henson MA, (2005) Cell ensemble modeling of metabolic oscillations in continuous yeast cultures. Comput Chem Eng 29: 645-661.
78. Domach MM, Shuler ML, (1984) A finite representation model for an asynchronous culture of E. coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 26: 877-884.