QSAR and metabolic assessment tools in the assessment of genotoxicity

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 930, Issue , 2013, Pages 125-162

  Worth, Andrew P ^a   Lapenna, Silvia ^a   Serafimova, Rositsa ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Chemical category; Expert system; Genotoxicity; Metabolism; Mutagenicity; Prediction; QSAR; Read across; Structural alert; Toxicity

Indexed keywords

2 AMINO 9H PYRIDO(2,3 B)INDOLE; 2 AMINOACETOPHENONE; 2-AMINO-9H-PYRIDO(2,3-B)INDOLE; 2-AMINOACETOPHENONE; ACETOPHENONE DERIVATIVE; CARBOLINE DERIVATIVE; MUTAGENIC AGENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DANGEROUS GOODS; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MUTAGEN TESTING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ACETOPHENONES; CARBOLINES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; METABOLISM; MUTAGENICITY TESTS; MUTAGENS; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84870481142     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-62703-059-5_6     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. European Commission (2006a) Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/ 769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/ 155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC. Official Journal of the European Union, L 396/1 of 30.12.2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 2006
2. European Commission (2006b) Directive 2006/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 amending Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances in order to adapt it to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and establishing a European Chemicals Agency. Official Journal of the European Union, L 396/850 of 30.12.2006. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 2006
3. European Commission (1998) Directive 98/ 8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 1998 concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union, L 132/1 of 24.04.1998. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 1998
4. European Commission (1991) Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal of the European Union, L 230/1 of 19.08.1991. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 1991
5. European Commission (2000a) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for the Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Union, L 327/1 of 22.12.2000. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 2000
6. European Commission (1976) Council Directive 76/768 of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products. Official Journal of the European Union, L 262/169 of 27.09.1976. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 1976
7. European Commission (2009) Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 November 2009
8. on cosmetic products (recast). Official Journal of the European Union, L 342/59 of 22.12.2009. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (OPOCE), Luxembourg 2009
9. European Commission (1996) Regulation No 2232/96 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 October 1996 laying down a Community Procedure for flavouring substances used or intended for use in or on foodstuffs. Official Journal of the European Communities 23.11.1996, L 299, 1-4.
10. European Commission (2000b) Commission Regulation No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000 laying down the measures necessary for the adoption of an evaluation programme in application of Regulation (EC) no. 2232/96. Official Journal of the European Communities 19.7.2000, L 180, 8-16
11. Worth AP (2010) The role of QSAR methodology in the regulatory assessment of chemicals. In: Puzyn T, Leszczynski J, Cronin MTD (eds) Recent advances in QSAR studies: Methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 367-382
12. Lapenna S, Fuart-Gatnik M, Worth A (2010) Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting acute and chronic systemic toxicity. JRC Technical Report EUR 24639 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-labs/computational-toxicology/publications/
13. Mostrag-Szlichtyng A,Worth A (2010) Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting biokinetic properties. JRC Technical Report EUR 24377 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http:// ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-labs/computational-toxicology/publications/
14. Serafimova R, Fuart Gatnik M, Worth A (2010) Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting genotoxicity and carcinogenicity. JRC Technical Report EUR 24427 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-labs/computational-toxicology/publica tions/
15. Sanderson DM, Earnshaw CG (1991) Computer prediction of possible toxic action from chemical structure; the DEREK system. Hum Exp Toxicol 10:261-273
16. Helma C (2006) Lazy structure-activity relationships (lazar) for the prediction of rodent carcinogenicity and Salmonella mutagenicity. Mol Divers 10:147-158
17. Maunz A, Helma C (2008) Prediction of chemical toxicity with local support vector regression and activity-specific kernels. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19(5-6):413-431
18. Button WG, Judson PN, Long A et al (2003) Using absolute and relative reasoning in the prediction of the potential metabolism of xenobiotics. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:1371-1377
19. Kroes R, Renwick AG, Cheeseman M et al (2004) Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): Guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food Chem Toxicol 42:65-83
20. Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Cronin MT (2008) Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19 (5-6):555-578
21. Rydberg P, Gloriam DE, Olsen L (2010) The SMARTCyp cytochrome P450 metabolism prediction server. Bioinformatics 26:2988-2989
22. Bassan A,Worth AP (2008) The integrated use of models for the properties and effects of chemicals by means of a structured workflow. QSAR Comb Sci 27:6-20
23. ECHA (2008) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland. http://guidance.echa. europa.eu/docs/guidance-document/information-requirements-en.htm
24. Worth A, Lapenna S, Lo Piparo E, Mostrag-Szlichtyng A, Serafimova R (2011) A Framework for assessing in silico toxicity predictions: Case studies with selected pesticides. JRC Technical Report EUR 24705 EN. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our-labs/ computational-toxicology/publications/
25. Dearden J (2011) Prediction of physicochemical properties. In: Resfeld B, Mayena AN (eds) Computational toxicology, Methods in molecular biology. Springer Science+Business Media, New York
26. Enoch SJ (2010) Chemical category formation and read-across for the prediction of toxicity. In: Puzyn T, Leszczynski J, Cronin MTD (eds) Recent advances in QSAR studies-methods and applications. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 209-219
27. Patlewicz G, Jeliazkova N, Gallegos Saliner A et al (2008) Toxmatch-a new software tool to aid in the development and evaluation of chemically similar groups. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:397-412
28. Franklin RB (2009) In silico studies in ADME/ Tox: Caveat emptor. Current computer-aided 2009. Drug Design 5:128-138
29. FrederiksenH(2005) Two food-borne heterocyclic amines: Metabolism and DNA adduct formation of amino-a-carbolines. Mol Nutr Food Res 49:263-273
30. KingRS, TeitelCH, Kadlubar FF (2000) In vitro bioactivation of N-hydroxy-2-amino-{alpha}-carboline. Carcinogenesis 21:1347-1354
31. Schut HAJ, Snyderwine EG (1999) DNA adducts of heterocyclic amine food mutagens: Implications for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 20:353-368
32. Pfau W, Schulze C, Shirai T et al (1997) Identification of the major hepatic DNA adduct formed by the food mutagen 2-amino-9H-pyrido[2,3-b]indole (AaC). Chem Res Toxicol 10:1192-1197
33. Frederiksen H, Frandsen H, Pfau W (2004) Syntheses of DNA adducts of two heterocyclic amines, 2-amino-3-methyl-9H-pyrido[2,3-b] indole (MeA{alpha}C) and 2-amino-9H-pyrido[ 2,3-b]indole (A{alpha}C) and identification of DNA adducts in organs from rats dosed with MeA{alpha}C. Carcinogenesis 25:1525-1533
34. Benigni R, Bossa C (2008) Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology. Mutat Res 659:248-261
35. Enoch SJ, Cronin MTD (2010) A review of the electrophilic reaction chemistry involved in covalent DNA binding. Crit Rev Toxicol 40:728-748
36. EFSA (2008) Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a request from Commission on Flavouring group evaluation 48: Aminoacetophenone. EFSA J 797:1-25, http://www.efsa.europa. eu/en/scdocs/doc/797.pdf
37. TNO (2000) Volatile compounds in food-VCF Database. TNO Nutrition and Food Research Institute, Boelens Aroma Chemical Information Service BACIS, Zeist
38. EFSA (2010) EFSA Panel on Food Contact Materials, Enzymes, Flavourings and Processing Aids. Draft Guidance on the data required for the risk assessment of flavourings. EFSA J 8 (6):1623, http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/ scdocs/scdoc/1623.htm
39. Colvin M, Hatch F, Felton J (1998) Chemical and biological factors affecting mutagen potency. Mutat Res 400:479-492
40. Miller E, Miller J (1981) Searches for ultimate chemical carcinogens and their reactions with cellular macromolecules. Cancer 47:2327-2345
41. Tates A, Kriek E (1981) Induction of chromosomal aberrations and sister-chromatid exchanges in Chinese hamster cells in vitro by some proximate and ultimate carcinogenic arylamide derivatives. Mutat Res 88:397-410
42. Popescu N, Turnbull D, DiPaolo J (1977) Sister chromatid exchange and chromosome aberration analysis with the use of several carcinogens and noncarcinogens: Brief communication. J Natl Cancer Inst 59:289-293
43. Kazius J, McGuire R, Bursi R (2004) Derivation and validation of toxicophores for mutagenicity prediction. J Med Chem 48:312-320
44. Kirkland D, Aardema M, Henderson L et al (2005) Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Mutat Res 584:1-256
45. Aeschbacher H-U, Turesky RJ (1991) Mammalian cell mutagenicity and metabolism of heterocyclic aromatic amines. Mutat Res 259:235-250
46. Bowden J, Chung K, Andrews A (1976) Mutagenic activity of tryptophan metabolites produced by rat intestinal microflora. J Natl Cancer Inst 57:921-924
47. Thompson C, Hill L, Epp J et al (1983) The induction of bacterial mutation and hepatocyte unscheduled DNA synthesis by monosubstituted anilines. Environ Mutagen 5:803-811