Science literacy for all: More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag!

Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research: Moving Forward

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 5-23

  Yore, Larry D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870478206     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_2     Document Type: Chapter

References (83)

1. Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2011). Drawing to learn in science. Science, 555(6046), 1096-1097.
2. Alberts, B. (2010). Prioritizing science education [Editorial]. Science, 528(5977), 405.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Arons, A. B. (1983). Achieving wider scientific literacy. Daedalus, 112(2), 91-122.
6. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientificliteracyandthemythofthescientificmethod. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
7. Bialystok, E. (2008). Learning a second language. In A. S. Rosebery & B. Warren (Eds.), Teaching science to English language learners: Building on students’ strengths (pp. 107-118). Arlington: NSTA Press.
8. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
9. Carlsen, W. S. (2007). Language and science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 57-74). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Coll, R. K., & Taylor, N. (Eds.). (2009). Exploring international perspectives of scientific literacy: An overview of the SpecialIssue [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 197-200.
11. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (1997). Common framework of science learning outcomes, K to 12: Pan-Canadian protocol for collaboration on school curriculum. Toronto: Author.
12. Cross, R. T. (1999). The public understanding of science: Implications for education. International Journal of Science Education, 21(7), 699-702.
13. DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582-601.
14. diSessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293-331.
15. Fang, Z. (2005). Scientific literacy: A systemic functional linguistics perspective. Science Education, 89(2), 335-347.
16. Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. J. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587-597.
17. Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17, 415-435.
18. Ford, C. L. (1998). Educating preservice teachers to teach for an evaluative view of knowledge and critical thinking in elementary social studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
19. Ford, M. J. (2008). Disciplinary authority and accountability in scientific practice and learning. Science Education, 92(3), 404-423.
20. Ford, M. J., & Forman, E. A. (2006). Redefining disciplinary learning in classroom contexts. Review of Research in Education, 30(1), 1-32.
21. Ford, C. L., & Yore, L. D. (2012). Toward convergence of metacognition, reflection, and critical thinking: Illustrations from natural and social sciences teacher education and classroom practice. In A. Zohar & J. Dori (Eds.), Metacognition in science education: Trends in current research (pp. 251-271). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
22. Ford, C. L., Yore, L. D., & Anthony, R. J. (1997, March). Reforms, visions, and standards: A crosscurricular view from an elementary school perspective. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED406168)
23. Good, R. G., Shymansky, J. A., & Yore, L. D. (1999). Censorship in science and science education. In E. H. Brinkley (Ed.), Caught off guard: Teachers rethinking censorship and controversy (pp. 101-121). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24. Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: A secondary analysis of six studies [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 615-637.
25. Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Science inquiry, argument and language: A case for the Science Writing Heuristic. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
26. Hand, B., & Keys, C. (1999). Inquiry investigation. The Science Teacher, 66(4), 27-29.
27. Hand, B., Prain, V., & Yore, L. D. (2001). Sequential writing tasks’ influence on science learning. In P. Tynjala, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice (Vol. 7 of Studies in writing, pp. 105-129). Dordrecht: Kluwer/Springer.
28. Hand, B., Yore, L. D., & Prain, V. (Eds.). (2006). Natural science, cognitive science and pedagogical influences on science literacy: Empowering research and informing instruction [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 99-314.
29. Hand, B., Norton-Meier, L., Staker, J., & Bintz, J. (2009). Negotiating science: The critical role of argument in student inquiry, grades 5-10. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
30. Hand, B., Yore, L. D., Jagger, S., & Prain, V. (2010). Connecting research in science literacy and classroom practice: A review of science teaching journals in Australia, the UK, and the United States, 1998-2008. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 45-68.
31. Hines, P. J., Wible, B., & McCartney, M. (Eds.). (2010). Learning to read, reading to learn [SpecialIssue]. Science, 328(5977), 447.
32. Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347-1362.
33. Holden, T. G., & Yore, L. D. (1996, March-April). Relationships among prior conceptual knowledge, metacognitive awareness, metacognitive self-management, cognitive style, perception-judgment style, attitude toward school science, self-regulation, and science achievement in grades 6-7 students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
34. Hurd, P. D. (1958). Science literacy: Its meaning for American schools. Educational Leadership, 16. 13-16 & 52.
35. International Technology Education Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology (3rd ed.). Reston: Author.
36. Kelly, G. J. (2007). Scientific literacy, discourse, and knowledge. In C. Linder, L. Ostman, & P.-O. Wickman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium (pp. 47-55). Uppsala: Geotryckeriet.
37. Klentschy, M. P., & Molina-De La Torre, E. (2004). Students’ science notebooks and the inquiry process. In E. W. Saul (Ed.), Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice (pp. 340-354). Newark: International Reading Association/National Science Teachers Association.
38. Klentschy, M. P., Garrison, L., & Amaral, O. M. (n.d.). Valle Imperial Project in Science (VIPS) four-year comparison of student achievement data 1995-1999 (Unpublished project report).
39. Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71-94.
40. Linder, C., Ostman, L., & Wickman, P.-O. (Eds.). (2007). Promoting scientific literacy: Science education research in transition. In Proceedings of the Linnaeus Tercentenary Symposium. Retrieved from http://www.fysik.uu.se/didaktik/lsl/Web%20Proceedings.pdf
41. McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2010). A secondary reanalysis of student perceptions of nontraditional writing tasks over a ten year period. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 518-539.
42. McEneaney, E. H. (2003). The worldwide cachet of scientific literacy. Comparative Education Review, 47(2), 217-237.
43. Mercer, N., Dawes, L., & Staarman, j. K. (2009). Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom. Language and Education, 5, 353-369.
44. Miller, J. D. (1983). Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review. Daedalus, 112(2), 29-48.
45. Moje, E. B. (2007). Chapter 1: Developing socially just subject-matter instruction: A review of the literature on disciplinary literacy teaching. Review of Research in Education, 31(1), 1-44.
46. Moje, E. B. (2008). Foregrounding the disciplines in secondary literacy teaching and learning: A call for change. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52(2), 96-107.
47. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular reports of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 947-967.
48. Norton-Meier, L., Hand, B., Hockenberry, L., & Wise, K. (2008). Questions, claims, and evidence: The important place of argument in children’s science writing. Portsmouth/Arlington: Heinemann/NSTA Press.
49. Pearson, P. D., Moje, E. B., & Greenleaf, C. (2010). Literacy and science: Each in the service of the other [SpecialIssue]. Science, 328(5977), 459-463.
50. Pella, M. O., O’Hearn, G. T., & Gale, C. W. (1966). Referents to scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(3), 199-208.
51. Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. F. (1999). Interpreting popular reports of science: What happens when the reader’s world meets the world on paper? International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 317-327.
52. Phillips, L. M., & Norris, S. P. (2009). Bridging the gap between the language of science and the language of school science through the use of adapted primary literature. Research in Science Education, 39(3), 313-319.
53. Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (Eds.). (2010). Representing science literacies [SpecialIssue]. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 1-101.
54. Revak, M., & Kuerbis, P. J. (2008, January). The link from professional development to K-6 student achievement in science, math, and literacy. Paper presented at the annual international meeting of the Association for Science Teacher Education, St. Louis, MO.
55. Roberts, D. A. (2007). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research in science education (pp. 729-780). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
56. Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (1992). A curriculum strategy that expands time for in-depth elementary science instruction by using science-based reading strategies: Effects of a year-long study in grade four. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(6), 545-554.
57. Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2006). Science IDEAS: Making the case for integrating reading and writing in elementary science as a key element in school reform. In R. Douglas, M. P. Klentschy, K. Worth, & W. Binder (Eds.), Linking science and literacy in the K-8 classroom (pp. 391-405). Arlington: NSTA Press.
58. Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2008). NSF/IERI science IDEAS project (Technical Report 0228353-0014). Boca Raton: Florida Atlantic University.
59. Science Council of Canada. (1984). Science for every student: Educating Canadians for tomorrow’s world. Ottawa: Ministry of Supply and Services.
60. Shamos, M. H. (Ed.). (1995). The myth of scientific literacy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
61. Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40-59.
62. Shen, B. S. P. (1975). Science literacy: The public understanding of science. In S. B. Day (Ed.), Communication of scientific information (pp. 44-52). New York: S. Karger.
63. Shymansky, J. A., Yore, L. D., & Hand, B. (2000). Empowering families in hands-on science programs. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 48-56.
64. Singapore Ministry of Education. (2010). Subject syllabuses - Sciences. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses/sciences/
65. Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science [SpecialIssue]. Science, 328(5977), 450-452.
66. Spence, D. J., Yore, L. D., & Williams, R. L. (1999). The effects of explicit science reading instruction on selected grade 7 students’ metacognition and comprehension of specific science text. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 11(2), 15-30.
67. Stoddart, T., Pinal, A., Latzke, M., & Canaday, D. (2002). Integrating inquiry science and language development for English language learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(8), 664-687.
68. Tippett, C. D. (2011). Exploring middle school students’ representational competence in science: Development and verification of a framework for learning with visual representations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. Available at http://hdl.handle.net/1828/3250
69. United States National Academy of Engineering. (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. G. Pearson & A. T. Young (Eds.). Committee on Technological Literacy, National Academy of Engineering, National Research Council. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
70. United States National Research Council. (1996). The national science education standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
71. United States National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Committee on Science Learning, Kindergarten through Eighth Grade.
72. R. A. Duschl, H. A. Schweingruber, & A. W. Shouse (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
73. United States National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Committee on Conceptual Framework for New Science Education Standards. H. Quinn & H. A. Schweingruber (Eds.). Board on Science Education, Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
74. van den Broek, P. (2010). Using texts in science education: Cognitive processes and knowledge representation [SpecialIssue]. Science, 328(5977), 453-456.
75. Webb, P. (2009). Towards an integrated learning strategies approach to promoting scientific Literacy in the South African context [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(3), 313-334.
76. Webb, P. (2010). Science education and literacy: Imperatives for the developed and developing world [SpecialIssue]. Science, 328(5977), 448-450.
77. Wyse, D. (2002). Becoming aprimary school teacher. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
78. Yore, L. D. (2008). Science literacy for all students: Language, culture, and knowledge about nature and naturally occurring events [SpecialIssue]. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1), 5-21. Retrieved from http://l1.publication-archive.com/show?repository=1&article=213
79. Yore, L. D., & Hand, B. (2010). Epilogue: Plotting a research agenda for multiple representations, multiple modality, and multimodal representational competency [SpecialIssue]. Research in Science Education, 40(1), 93-101.
80. Yore, L. D., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. I nternational Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 689-725.
81. Yore, L. D., Florence, M. K., Pearson, T. W., & Weaver, A. J. (2006). Written discourse in scientific communities: A conversation with two scientists about their views of science, use of language, role of writing in doing science, and compatibility between their epistemic views and language. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2/3), 109-141.
82. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (Eds.). (2007a). Language - An end and a means to mathematical literacy and scientific literacy [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 557-769.
83. Yore, L. D., Pimm, D., & Tuan, H.-L. (2007b). The literacy component of mathematical and scientific literacy [SpecialIssue]. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 5(4), 559-589.