The Relative Effects of Explicit Correction and Recasts on Two Target Structures via Two Communication Modes

Language Learning

Volumn 62, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1134-1169

  Yilmaz, Yucel ^a  

^a SAKARYA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Explicit correction; Locative; Negative feedback; Plural; Recasts; Structural salience; Synchronous computer mediated communication; Turkish

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869871756     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00726.x     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alanen, R. (1995). Input enhancement and rule presentation in second language acquisition. In R. Schmidt (Ed.), Attention and awareness in foreign language acquisition (pp. 259-302). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
2. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts, and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
3. Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: A window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 120-136.
4. Blum-Kulka, S. (1987). Indirectness and politeness: Same or different? Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 145-160.
5. Brown, R. (1973). A first language Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
6. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
7. Carroll, S., Roberge, Y. & Swain, M. (1992). The role of feedback in adult second language acquisition: Error correction and morphological generalization. Applied Psycholinguistics, 13, 173-198.
8. Carroll, S. E., & Swain, M. (1993). Explicit and implicit negative feedback: An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 357-386.
9. Cedrus. (2003). SuperLab 4.0. San Pedro, CA : Cedrus Corporation.
10. Choi, M. Y. (2000). Effects of recasts on irregular past tense verb morphology in Web-chat Unpublished master's thesis, University of Hawai'i, Honolulu, HI
11. Doughty, C. J. (2001). Cognitive underpinnings of focus on form. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 206-257). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
12. Doughty, C. J., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). New York : Cambridge University Press.
13. Doughty, C. J., & Williams, J. (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition New York : Cambridge University Press.
14. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339-360). New York : Oxford University Press.
15. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
16. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the "natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
17. Havranek, G., & Cesnik, H. (2001). Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In S. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (Eds.), EUROSLA yearbook (Vol. 1, pp. 99-122). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
18. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
19. Kitade, K. (2000). L2 learners' discourse and SLA theories in CMC: Collaborative interaction in internet chat. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 143-166.
20. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 102-120.
21. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30, 275-288.
22. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
23. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
24. Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Corrective feedback in the chatroom: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 19, 1-14.
25. Loewen, S., & Nabei, T. (2007). Measuring the effects of oral corrective feedback on L2 knowledge. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 361-377). New York : Oxford University Press.
26. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
27. Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. In H. Winitz (Ed.), Native language and foreign language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
28. Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In K. de Bot, R. Ginsberg, & C. Kramsch (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39-52). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
29. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). New York : Academic Press.
30. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. J. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York : Cambridge University Press.
31. Long, M. H. (2007). Problems in SLA Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
32. Lyster, R. (1998). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
33. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts in form-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
34. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37-66.
35. Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
36. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in SLA: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 408-452). New York : Oxford University Press.
37. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
38. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002). Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning (pp. 181-209). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
39. McCulloch, C. E., & Searle, S. R. (2000). General, linear and mixed models New York : Wiley.
40. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 323-338). New York : Oxford University Press.
41. Ono, L., & Witzel, J. (2002). Recasts, salience, and morpheme acquisition Unpublished Scholarly Paper. Honolulu : Department of Second Language Studies, University of Hawai′i.
42. Ortega, L., & Long, M. H. (1997). The effects of models and recasts on the acquisition of object topicalization and adverb placement in L2 Spanish. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 1, 65-86.
43. Payne, J. S., & Whitney, P. J. (2002). Developing L2 oral proficiency through synchronous CMC: Output, working memory, and interlanguage development. CALICO Journal, 20, 7-32.
44. Rosa, E. M., & Leow, R. P. (2004). Computerized task-based exposure, explicitness, type of feedback, and Spanish L2 development. Modern Language Journal, 88, 192-216.
45. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for second language acquisition: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Amsterdam : John Benjamins.
46. Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 5-27.
47. Sanz, C. (2003). Computer delivered implicit vs. explicit feedback in processing instruction. In B. VanPatten (Ed.), In processing instruction: Theory, research and commentary (second language acquisition research) (pp. 241-255). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
48. Sauro, S. (2009). Computer-mediated corrective feedback and the development of L2 grammar. Language Learning and Technology, 13, 96-120.
49. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, UK : Cambridge University Press.
50. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversation ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
51. Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147-163.
52. Sheen, Y. (2006). Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research, 10, 361-392.
53. Sheen, Y. (2007a). The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners' acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
54. Sheen, Y. (2007b). The effects of corrective feedback, language aptitude, and learner attitudes on the acquisition of English articles. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 301-322). New York : Oxford University Press.
55. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
56. Slobin, D. I. (1971). Data for the symposium. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The ontogenesis of grammar (pp. 3-14). New York : Academic Press.
57. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
58. Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 471-484). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
59. Tabachnik, B. G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics Boston : Allyn & Bacon.
60. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2001). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data New York : Springer-Verlag.
61. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. Modern Language Journal, 81, 470-481.
62. White, L. (1991). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some positive and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133-161.
63. Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. The Modern Language Journal, 95, 115-132.
64. Yilmaz, Y., & Yuksel, D. (2011). Effects of communication mode and salience on recasts: A first exposure study. Language Teaching Research, 15, 457-477.