Directed cytoskeleton self-organization

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 671-682

  Vignaud, Timothée ^a   Blanchoin, Laurent ^a   Théry, Manuel ^a  

^a CEA GRENOBLE   (France)

Author keywords

Actin; Architecture; Microfabrication; Micropatterning; Microtubule; Polarity

Indexed keywords

ACTIN;

CELL DIVISION; CELL POLARITY; CELL TYPE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA CELL; CYTOLOGY; CYTOSKELETON; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW;

EID: 84869864367     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.08.012     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Karsenti E. Self-organization in cell biology: a brief history. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9:255-262.
2. Huber F., Käs J. Self-regulative organization of the cytoskeleton. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken) 2011, 68:259-265.
3. Surrey T., et al. Physical properties determining self-organization of motors and microtubules. Science 2001, 292:1167-1171.
4. Schaller V., et al. Polar patterns of driven filaments. Nature 2010, 467:73-77.
5. Sumino Y., et al. Large-scale vortex lattice emerging from collectively moving microtubules. Nature 2012, 483:448-452.
6. Cortès S., et al. Microtubule self-organisation by reaction-diffusion processes in miniature cell-sized containers and phospholipid vesicles. Biophys. Chem. 2006, 120:168-177.
7. Pollard T.D., Cooper J.A. Actin and actin-binding proteins. A critical evaluation of mechanisms and functions. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1986, 55:987-1035.
8. De La Cruz E.M., et al. Polymerization and structure of nucleotide-free actin filaments. J. Mol. Biol. 2000, 295:517-526.
9. Xu K., et al. Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton. Nat. Methods 2012, 9:185-188.
10. Pollard T.D. Regulation of actin filament assembly by Arp2/3 complex and formins. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2007, 36:451-477.
11. Yarar D., et al. The Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein directs actin-based motility by stimulating actin nucleation with the Arp2/3 complex. Curr. Biol. 1999, 9:555-558.
12. Oudenaarden A.V., Theriot J.A. Cooperative symmetry-breaking by actin polymerization in a model for cell motility. Nat. Cell Biol. 1999, 1:493-499.
13. van der Gucht J., et al. Stress release drives symmetry breaking for actin-based movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:7847-7852.
14. Bernheim-Groswasser A., et al. Mechanism of actin-based motility: a dynamic state diagram. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:1411-1419.
15. Achard V., et al. A "primer" -based mechanism underlies branched actin filament network formation and motility. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:423-428.
16. Noireaux V., et al. Growing an actin gel on spherical surfaces. Biophys. J. 2000, 78:1643-1654.
17. Bernheim-Groswasser A., et al. The dynamics of actin-based motility depend on surface parameters. Nature 2002, 417:308-311.
18. Lacayo C.I., et al. Choosing orientation: influence of cargo geometry and ActA polarization on actin comet tails. Mol. Biol. Cell 2012, 23:614-629.
19. Michelot A., et al. Actin-filament stochastic dynamics mediated by ADF/cofilin. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:825-833.
20. Soares e Silva M., et al. Self-organized patterns of actin filaments in cell-sized confinement. Soft Matter 2011, 7:10631.
21. Månsson A., et al. Self-organization of motor-propelled cytoskeletal filaments at topographically defined borders. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012, 2012:647265.
22. Liu A.P., et al. Membrane-induced bundling of actin filaments. Nat. Phys. 2008, 4:789-793.
23. Roos W.H., et al. Freely suspended actin cortex models on arrays of microfabricated pillars. Chemphyschem 2003, 4:872-877.
24. Uhrig K., et al. Optical force sensor array in a microfluidic device based on holographic optical tweezers. Lab Chip 2009, 9:661-668.
25. Reymann A-C., et al. Nucleation geometry governs ordered actin networks structures. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9:827-832.
26. Pinot M., et al. Confinement induces actin flow in a meiotic cytoplasm. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:11705-11710.
27. Reymann A-C., et al. Actin network architecture can determine myosin motor activity. Science 2012, 336:1310-1314.
28. Thoresen T., et al. Reconstitution of contractile actomyosin bundles. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:2698-2705.
29. Shelanski M.L. Chemistry of the filaments and tubules of brain. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1973, 21:529-539.
30. Holy T.E., et al. Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:6228-6231.
31. Laan L., et al. Cortical dynein controls microtubule dynamics to generate pulling forces that position microtubule asters. Cell 2012, 148:502-514.
32. Nedelec F., et al. Self-organization of microtubules and motors. Nature 1997, 389:305-308.
33. Pinot M., et al. Effects of confinement on the self-organization of microtubules and motors. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:954-960.
34. Cosentino Lagomarsino M., et al. Microtubule organization in three-dimensional confined geometries: evaluating the role of elasticity through a combined in vitro and modeling approach. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:1046-1057.
35. Emsellem V., et al. Vesicle deformation by microtubules: a phase diagram. Phys. Rev. E 1998, 58:4807-4810.
36. Fygenson D., et al. Mechanics of microtubule-based membrane extension. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 79:4497-4500.
37. Karsenti E., Vernos I. The mitotic spindle: a self-made machine. Science 2001, 294:543-547.
38. Heald R., et al. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts. Nature 1996, 382:420-425.
39. Halpin D., et al. Mitotic spindle assembly around RCC1-coated beads in Xenopus egg extracts. PLoS Biol. 2011, 9:e1001225.
40. Gaetz J., et al. Examining how the spatial organization of chromatin signals influences metaphase spindle assembly. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006, 8:924-932.
41. Dinarina A., et al. Chromatin shapes the mitotic spindle. Cell 2009, 138:502-513.
42. Bornens M., et al. The cortical microfilament system of lymphoblasts displays a periodic oscillatory activity in the absence of microtubules: implications for cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 109:1071-1083.
43. Bailly E., et al. The cortical actomyosin system of cytochalasin D-treated lymphoblasts. Exp. Cell Res. 1991, 196:287-293.
44. Paluch E., et al. Cortical actomyosin breakage triggers shape oscillations in cells and cell fragments. Biophys. J. 2005, 89:724-733.
45. Cavalcanti-Adam E.A., et al. Cell spreading and focal adhesion dynamics are regulated by spacing of integrin ligands. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:2964-2974.
46. Schvartzman M., et al. Nanolithographic control of the spatial organization of cellular adhesion receptors at the single-molecule level. Nano Lett. 2011, 11:1306-1312.
47. Vignaud T., et al. Reprogramming cell shape with laser nano-patterning. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:2134-2140.
48. Lehnert D., et al. Cell behaviour on micropatterned substrata: limits of extracellular matrix geometry for spreading and adhesion. J. Cell Sci. 2004, 117:41-52.
49. Vianay B., et al. Single cells spreading on a protein lattice adopt an energy minimizing shape. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105:3-6.
50. Levina E.M., et al. Cytoskeletal control of fibroblast length: experiments with linear strips of substrate. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114:4335-4341.
51. Picone R., et al. A polarised population of dynamic microtubules mediates homeostatic length control in animal cells. PLoS Biol. 2010, 8:e1000542.
52. Vartanian K.B., et al. Endothelial cell cytoskeletal alignment independent of fluid shear stress on micropatterned surfaces. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 371:787-792.
53. Terenna C.R., et al. Physical mechanisms redirecting cell polarity and cell shape in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1748-1753.
54. Bergert M., et al. Cell mechanics control rapid transitions between blebs and lamellipodia during migration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 666:1-7.
55. James J., et al. Subcellular curvature at the perimeter of micropatterned cells influences lamellipodial distribution and cell polarity. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2008, 65:841-852.
56. Parker K.K., et al. Directional control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. FASEB J. 2002, 16:1195-1204.
57. Brock A., et al. Geometric determinants of directional cell motility revealed using microcontact printing. Langmuir 2003, 19:1611-1617.
58. Rossier O.M., et al. Force generated by actomyosin contraction builds bridges between adhesive contacts. EMBO J. 2010, 29:1055-1068.
59. Tan J.L., et al. Cells lying on a bed of microneedles: an approach to isolate mechanical force. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003, 100:1484-1489.
60. Rape A.D., et al. The regulation of traction force in relation to cell shape and focal adhesions. Biomaterials 2011, 32:2043-2051.
61. Kilian K., et al. Geometric cues for directing the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:4872-4877.
62. Hu S., et al. Mechanical anisotropy of adherent cells probed by a 3D magnetic twisting device. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 2004, 287. C1884-C1191.
63. Khatau S.B., et al. A perinuclear actin cap regulates nuclear shape. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:19017-19022.
64. Bray M-A., et al. Sarcomere alignment is regulated by myocyte shape. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2008, 651:641-651.
65. Xu J., et al. Effects of micropatterned curvature on the motility and mechanical properties of airway smooth muscle cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 415:591-596.
66. Théry M., et al. Cell distribution of stress fibres in response to the geometry of the adhesive environment. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2006, 63:341-355.
67. Tseng Q., et al. A new micropatterning method of soft substrates reveals that different tumorigenic signals can promote or reduce cell contraction levels. Lab Chip 2011, 11:2231-2240.
68. Bischofs I.B., et al. Filamentous network mechanics and active contractility determine cell and tissue shape. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:3488-3496.
69. Théry M., et al. Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006, 103:19771-19776.
70. Wu J., et al. Effects of dynein on microtubule mechanics and centrosome positioning. Mol. Biol. Cell 2011, 22:4834-4841.
71. Hale C.M., et al. SMRT analysis of MTOC and nuclear positioning reveals the role of EB1 and LIC1 in single-cell polarization. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:4267-4285.
72. Zhu J., et al. finding the cell center by a balance of dynein and myosin pulling and microtubule pushing: a computational study. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21:4418-4427.
73. Dupin I., et al. Classical cadherins control nucleus and centrosome position and cell polarity. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 185:779-786.
74. Camand E., et al. N-cadherin expression level modulates integrin-mediated polarity and strongly impacts on the speed and directionality of glial cell migration. J. Cell Sci. 2012, 125:844-857.
75. Lombardi M.L., et al. The interaction between nesprins and sun proteins at the nuclear envelope is critical for force transmission between the nucleus and cytoskeleton. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:26743-26753.
76. Pitaval A., et al. Cell shape and contractility regulate ciliogenesis in cell cycle-arrested cells. J. Cell Biol. 2010, 191:303-312.
77. Mahmud G., et al. Directing cell motions on micropatterned ratchets. Nat. Phys. 2009, 5:606-612.
78. Kushiro K., et al. Modular design of micropattern geometry achieves combinatorial enhancements in cell motility. Langmuir 2012, 28:4357-4362.
79. Yoon S-H., et al. A biological breadboard platform for cell adhesion and detachment studies. Lab Chip 2011, 11:3555-3562.
80. Csucs G., et al. Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2007, 64:856-867.
81. Doyle A.D., et al. One-dimensional topography underlies three-dimensional fibrillar cell migration. J. Cell Biol. 2009, 184:481-490.
82. Pouthas F., et al. In migrating cells, the Golgi complex and the position of the centrosome depend on geometrical constraints of the substratum. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121:2406-2414.
83. Maiuri P., et al. The world first cell race. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22:R673-R675.
84. Théry M., et al. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 2007, 447:493-496.
85. Fink J., et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:771-778.
86. Samora C.P., et al. MAP4 and CLASP1 operate as a safety mechanism to maintain a stable spindle position in mitosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:1040-1050.
87. Kiyomitsu T., Cheeseman I.M. Chromosome- and spindle-pole-derived signals generate an intrinsic code for spindle position and orientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012, 14:311-317.
88. Minc N., et al. Influence of cell geometry on division-plane positioning. Cell 2011, 144:414-426.
89. Minc N., Piel M. Predicting division plane position and orientation. Trends Cell Biol. 2012, 22:193-200.
90. Huang S., et al. Symmetry-breaking in mammalian cell cohort migration during tissue pattern formation: role of random-walk persistence. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 2005, 61:201-213.
91. Burute M., Thery M. Spatial segregation of cell-cell and cell-matrix adhesions. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2012, 24:628-636.
92. Tseng Q., et al. Spatial organization of the extracellular matrix regulates cell-cell junction positioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:1506-1511.
93. McCain M.L., et al. Cooperative coupling of cell-matrix and cell-cell adhesions in cardiac muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:9881-9886.
94. Serra-Picamal X., et al. Mechanical waves during tissue expansion. Nat. Phys. 2012, 8:628-634.
95. Wan L.Q., et al. Micropatterned mammalian cells exhibit phenotype-specific left-right asymmetry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:12295-12300.
96. Desai R.A., et al. Cell polarity triggered by cell-cell adhesion via E-cadherin. J. Cell Sci. 2009, 122:905-911.
97. Reffay M., et al. Orientation and polarity in collectively migrating cell structures: statics and dynamics. Biophys. J. 2011, 100:2566-2575.
98. Mullins R.D. Cytoskeletal mechanisms for breaking cellular symmetry. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2010, 2:a003392.