Predicting division plane position and orientation

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 193-200

  Minc, Nicolas ^a   Piel, Matthieu ^a  

^a CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL FUNCTION; CELL POLARITY; CELL TYPE; GEOMETRY; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; CELL DIVISION; CELL POLARITY; CELL SHAPE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84859266215     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.01.003     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. Morin X., Bellaiche Y. Mitotic spindle orientation in asymmetric and symmetric cell divisions during animal development. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:102-119.
2. Gillies T.E., Cabernard C. Cell division orientation in animals. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:R599-R609.
3. Castanon I., Gonzalez-Gaitan M. Oriented cell division in vertebrate embryogenesis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23:697-704.
4. Rasmussen C.G., et al. Determination of symmetric and asymmetric division planes in plant cells. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2011, 62:387-409.
5. Sachs J. On the arrangement of cells in embryonic tissues. Arb. Bot. Inst. Würzburg 1878, 2:46-104. (in German).
6. Sachs J. Lecture XXVII. Relations Between Growth and Cell-division in the Embryonic Tissues 1887, Clarendon Press.
7. Wilson E.B. The Cell in Development and Heredity 1925, Macmillan.
8. Hofmeister, W. (1867) The Lessons from the Plant Cells, Wilhem Engelmann (in German).
9. Errera L. On a fundamental condition of equilibrium for living cells. C. R. Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci. 1886, 103:822-824. (in French).
10. Hertwig O. The problem of fertilization and of isotropy of the egg, a theory of heredity. Jena. Z. Naturwiss. 1884, 18:21-23. (in German).
11. Hertwig O. About the value of the first cleavage for the organisation of the embryo. Experimental studies on frog and triton eggs. Arch. Mikr. Anat. 1893, xlii:662-807. (in German).
12. Gibson W.T., et al. Control of the mitotic cleavage plane by local epithelial topology. Cell 2011, 144:427-438.
13. O'Connell C.B., Wang Y.L. Mammalian spindle orientation and position respond to changes in cell shape in a dynein-dependent fashion. Mol. Biol. Cell 2000, 11:1765-1774.
14. Strauss B., et al. A default mechanism of spindle orientation based on cell shape is sufficient to generate cell fate diversity in polarised Xenopus blastomeres. Development 2006, 133:3883-3893.
15. Gray D., et al. First cleavage of the mouse embryo responds to change in egg shape at fertilization. Curr. Biol. 2004, 14:397-405.
16. Smith L.G. Plant cell division: building walls in the right places. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2:33-39.
17. Tran P.T., et al. A mechanism for nuclear positioning in fission yeast based on microtubule pushing. J. Cell Biol. 2001, 153:397-411.
18. Reinsch S., Gonczy P. Mechanisms of nuclear positioning. J. Cell Sci. 1998, 111:2283-2295.
19. Wuhr M., et al. How does a millimeter-sized cell find its center?. Cell Cycle 2009, 8:1115-1121.
20. Mogilner A., et al. Modeling mitosis. Trends Cell Biol. 2006, 16:88-96.
21. Lloyd C. How does the cytoskeleton read the laws of geometry in aligning the division plane of plant cells?. Development 1991, 113:55-65.
22. Besson S., Dumais J. Universal rule for the symmetric division of plant cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:6294-6299.
23. Sahlin P., Jonsson H. A modeling study on how cell division affects properties of epithelial tissues under isotropic growth. PLoS ONE 2010, 5:e11750.
24. Paluch E., Heisenberg C.P. Biology and physics of cell shape changes in development. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R790-R799.
25. Thery M., Bornens M. Get round and stiff for mitosis. HFSP J. 2008, 2:65-71.
26. Rappaport R. Cytokinesis in Animal Cells 1996, Cambridge University Press.
27. Burgess D.R., Chang F. Site selection for the cleavage furrow at cytokinesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:156-162.
28. Ou G., et al. Polarized myosin produces unequal-size daughters during asymmetric cell division. Science 2010, 330:677-680.
29. Cabernard C., et al. A spindle-independent cleavage furrow positioning pathway. Nature 2010, 467:91-94.
30. Grill S.W., et al. Polarity controls forces governing asymmetric spindle positioning in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. Nature 2001, 409:630-633.
31. Grill S.W., et al. The distribution of active force generators controls mitotic spindle position. Science 2003, 301:518-521.
32. Grill S.W., Hyman A.A. Spindle positioning by cortical pulling forces. Dev. Cell 2005, 8:461-465.
33. Azoury J., et al. Spindle positioning in mouse oocytes relies on a dynamic meshwork of actin filaments. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1514-1519.
34. Kunda P., Baum B. The actin cytoskeleton in spindle assembly and positioning. Trends Cell Biol. 2009, 19:174-179.
35. Li H., et al. Actin-driven chromosomal motility leads to symmetry breaking in mammalian meiotic oocytes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:1301-1308.
36. Schuh M., Ellenberg J. A new model for asymmetric spindle positioning in mouse oocytes. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1986-1992.
37. Rosenblatt J., et al. Myosin II-dependent cortical movement is required for centrosome separation and positioning during mitotic spindle assembly. Cell 2004, 117:361-372.
38. Thery M., et al. The extracellular matrix guides the orientation of the cell division axis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2005, 7:947-953.
39. Fink J., et al. External forces control mitotic spindle positioning. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:771-778.
40. Thery M., et al. Experimental and theoretical study of mitotic spindle orientation. Nature 2007, 447:493-496.
41. Minc N., et al. Influence of cell geometry on division-plane positioning. Cell 2011, 144:414-426.
42. Kimmel C.B., et al. Stages of embryonic development of the zebrafish. Dev. Dyn. 1995, 203:253-310.
43. Wuhr M., et al. A model for cleavage plane determination in early amphibian and fish embryos. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:2040-2045.
44. Vallee R.B., Stehman S.A. How dynein helps the cell find its center: a servomechanical model. Trends Cell Biol. 2005, 15:288-294.
45. Kimura A., Onami S. Computer simulations and image processing reveal length-dependent pulling force as the primary mechanism for C. elegans male pronuclear migration. Dev. Cell 2005, 8:765-775.
46. Vogel S.K., et al. Self-organization of dynein motors generates meiotic nuclear oscillations. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000087.
47. Hara Y., Kimura A. Cell-size-dependent spindle elongation in the Caenorhabditis elegans early embryo. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1549-1554.
48. Foethke D., et al. Force- and length-dependent catastrophe activities explain interphase microtubule organization in fission yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:241.
49. Tischer C., et al. Force- and kinesin-8-dependent effects in the spatial regulation of fission yeast microtubule dynamics. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2009, 5:250.
50. Seetapun D., Odde D.J. Cell-length-dependent microtubule accumulation during polarization. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:979-988.
51. Gardner M.K., et al. Chromosome congression by kinesin-5 motor-mediated disassembly of longer kinetochore microtubules. Cell 2008, 135:894-906.
52. Varga V., et al. Kinesin-8 motors act cooperatively to mediate length-dependent microtubule depolymerization. Cell 2009, 138:1174-1183.
53. Bjerknes M. Physical theory of the orientation of astral mitotic spindles. Science 1986, 234:1413-1416.
54. Dogterom M., Yurke B. Measurement of the force-velocity relation for growing microtubules. Science 1997, 278:856-860.
55. Holy T.E., et al. Assembly and positioning of microtubule asters in microfabricated chambers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94:6228-6231.
56. Pecreaux J., et al. Spindle oscillations during asymmetric cell division require a threshold number of active cortical force generators. Curr. Biol. 2006, 16:2111-2122.
57. Kozlowski C., et al. Cortical microtubule contacts position the spindle in C. elegans embryos. Cell 2007, 129:499-510.
58. Morin X., et al. Control of planar divisions by the G-protein regulator LGN maintains progenitors in the chick neuroepithelium. Nat. Neurosci. 2007, 10:1440-1448.
59. Howard J. Elastic and damping forces generated by confined arrays of dynamic microtubules. Phys. Biol. 2006, 3:54-66.
60. Grill S.W., et al. Theory of mitotic spindle oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94:108104.
61. Peyre E., et al. A lateral belt of cortical LGN and NuMA guides mitotic spindle movements and planar division in neuroepithelial cells. J. Cell Biol. 2011, 193:141-154.
62. Quesada-Hernandez E., et al. Stereotypical cell division orientation controls neural rod midline formation in zebrafish. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1966-1972.
63. Tang N., et al. Control of mitotic spindle angle by the RAS-regulated ERK1/2 pathway determines lung tube shape. Science 2011, 333:342-345.
64. Segalen M., Bellaiche Y. Cell division orientation and planar cell polarity pathways. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20:972-977.
65. Linthilhac P.M., Vesecky T.B. Stress-induced alignment of division plane in plant tissues grown in vitro. Nature 1984, 307:363-364.
66. Werts A.D., Goldstein B. How signaling between cells can orient a mitotic spindle. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2011, 22:842-849.
67. Song B., et al. Electrical cues regulate the orientation and frequency of cell division and the rate of wound healing in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002, 99:13577-13582.
68. Howard J., et al. Turing's next steps: the mechanochemical basis of morphogenesis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2011, 12:392-398.
69. Mao Y., et al. Planar polarization of the atypical myosin Dachs orients cell divisions in Drosophila. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:131-136.
70. Concha M.L., Adams R.J. Oriented cell divisions and cellular morphogenesis in the zebrafish gastrula and neurula: a time-lapse analysis. Development 1998, 125:983-994.
71. Minc N., et al. Establishing new sites of polarization by microtubules. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:83-94.
72. Terenna C.R., et al. Physical mechanisms redirecting cell polarity and cell shape in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:1748-1753.
73. Carreno S., et al. Moesin and its activating kinase Slik are required for cortical stability and microtubule organization in mitotic cells. J. Cell Biol. 2008, 180:739-746.
74. Goehring N.W., et al. Polarization of PAR proteins by advective triggering of a pattern-forming system. Science 2011, 334:1137-1141.
75. Kunda P., et al. Moesin controls cortical rigidity, cell rounding, and spindle morphogenesis during mitosis. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:91-101.
76. Gong Y., et al. Planar cell polarity signalling controls cell division orientation during zebrafish gastrulation. Nature 2004, 430:689-693.
77. Tsou M.F., et al. PAR-dependent and geometry-dependent mechanisms of spindle positioning. J. Cell Biol. 2003, 160:845-855.
78. Aigouy B., et al. Cell flow reorients the axis of planar polarity in the wing epithelium of Drosophila. Cell 2010, 142:773-786.
79. Luxenburg C., et al. Developmental roles for Srf, cortical cytoskeleton and cell shape in epidermal spindle orientation. Nat. Cell Biol. 2011, 13:203-214.
80. Stewart M.P., et al. Hydrostatic pressure and the actomyosin cortex drive mitotic cell rounding. Nature 2011, 469:226-230.
81. Ranft J., et al. Fluidization of tissues by cell division and apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:20863-20868.