Dataset-driven research to support learning and knowledge analytics

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 133-148

  Verbert, Katrien ^a   Manouselis, Nikos ^b,c   Drachsler, Hendrik ^d   Duval, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b University of Alcala   (Greece)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ALCALÁ   (Spain)

^d OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Datasets; Learning and knowledge analytics; Open science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869755088     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Baker, R. S. J., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Evenson, S., Roll, I., Wagner, A. Z.,. Beck, J. (2006). Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system. In M. Ikeda et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 392-401). Berlin: Springer.
2. Brusilovsky, P., & Millan, E. (2007). User models for adaptive hypermedia and adaptive educational systems. In P. Brusilovsky et al. (Eds.), The adaptive web (pp. 3-53). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
3. Butoianu, V., Vidal, P., Verbert, K., Duval, E., & Broisin, J. (2010). User context and personalized learning: A federation of contextualized attention metadata. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 16(16), 2252-2271.
4. Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2007). Is over practice necessary? - Improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through educational data mining. In R. Luckin & K. Koedinger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on AIED (pp. 511-518). Los Angeles: IOS Press.
5. Chervenak, A., Foster, I., Kesselman, C., Salisbury, C., & Tuecke, S. (2000). The data grid: Towards an architecture for the distributed management and analysis of large scientific datasets. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 23(3), 187-200.
6. Ciekanski, M., & Chanier, T. (2008). Developing online multimodal verbal communication to enhance the writing process in an audio-graphic conferencing environment. ReCALL, 20(2), 162-182.
7. Conati, C., & Maclaren, H. (2005). Data-driven refinement of a probabilistic model of user affect. In L. Ardissono, P. Brna, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), User Modeling 2005 (pp. 40-49). Berlin: Springer.
8. D'Mello, S., Picard, R. W., & Graesser, A. (2007). Towards an affect-sensitive autotutor. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 22(4), 53-61.
9. Drachsler, H., Hummel, H. G. K., & Koper, R. (2009). Identifying the goal, user model and conditions of recommender systems for formal and informal learning. Journal of Digital Information, 10(2), 4-24.
10. Drachsler, H., Bogers, T., Vuorikari, R., Verbert, K., Duval, E., Manouselis, N., Wolpers, M. (2010). Issues and considerations regarding sharable data sets for recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. Procedia Computer Science, 1(2), 2849-2858.
11. Duval, E. (2011). Attention please!: Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, (pp. 9-17). New York, NY: ACM.
12. Elias, T. (2011). Learning Analytics: Definitions, processes and potential. Retrieved February 9, 2012, from http://learninganalytics.net/LearningAnalyticsDefinitionsProcessesPotential.pdf
13. Govaerts, S., Verbert, K., Klerkx, J., & Duval, E. (2010). Visualizing activities for self-reflection and awareness. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6483, 91-100.
14. Hausmann, R. G. M., van de Sande, B. & VanLehn, K. (2008). Trialog: How peer collaboration helps remediate errors in an ITS. In D. Wilson & H. C. Lane (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21st International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (pp. 415-420). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI Press.
15. Heer, J., & boyd, d. (2005). Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In J. T. Stasko & M. O. Ward (Eds), Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (p. 5). Washington, DC: IEEE.
16. Kaptelinin, V., Kuutti, K., & Bannon, L. J. (1995). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. In B. Blumenthal et al. (Eds.), Selected papers from the 5th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 89-201). London, UK: Springer-Verlag.
17. King, G. (2007). An introduction to the dataverse network as an infrastructure for data sharing. Sociological Methods Research, 36(2), 173-199.
18. MacWhinney, B. (1996). The CHILDES System. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 5, 5-14.
19. MacWhinney, B. (2007). The TalkBank project. Retrieved from Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology website: http://repository.cmu.edu/psychology/174
20. Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Verbert, K., & Santos, O. C. (2010a). RecSysTEL preface 2010. Procedia Computer Science, 1(2), 2773-2774.
21. Manouselis, N., Vuorikari, R., & Van Assche, F. (2010b). Collaborative recommendation of e-learning resources: An experimental investigation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(4), 227-242.
22. Manouselis, N., Drachsler, H., Vuorikari, R., Hummel, H., & Koper, R. (2011). Recommender systems in technology enhanced learning. In L. Rokach et al. (Eds.), Recommender systems handbook: A complete guide for research scientists & practitioners (pp.387-415). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
23. Mazza, R., & Milani, C. (2005, July). Exploring usage analysis in learning systems: Gaining insights from visualisations. Paper presented at the Workshop on Usage Analysis in Learning Systems, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
24. Pahl, C., & Donnellan, C. (2002). Data mining technology for the evaluation of web-based teaching and learning systems. In M. Driscoll & T. Reeves, (Eds.), Proceedings of Conference on E-Learning in Business (pp. 747-752). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
25. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003, June). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance learning. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, Bergen, Norway.
26. Reffay, C., Teplovs, C., & Blondel, F. -M. (2011). Productive re-use of CSCL data and analytic tools to provide a new perspective on group cohesion. In H. Spada et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of CSCL 2011(pp. 846-850). Hong Kong, China: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
27. Reffay, C., & Betbeder, M. -L. (2009). Sharing corpora and tools to improve interaction analysis. In U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, & M. Specht (Eds.), Proceedings of EC-TEL'09, LNCS, volume (pp. 196-210). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
28. Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135-146.
29. st International Conference on Educational Data Mining website: http://www.educationaldatamining.org/EDM2008/index.php?page=proceedings
30. Scheffel, M., Niemann, K., Pardo, A., Leony, D., Friedrich, M., Schmidt, K., Kloos, C.D. (2011). Usage pattern recognition in student activities. In U. Cress et al. (Eds), Proceedings of Fourth European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, (pp.341-355). Berlin: Springer-Verlag
31. Schmitz, H.-C., Scheffel, M., Friedrich, M., Jahn, M., Niemann, K. & Wolpers, M. (2009). CAMera for PLE. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5794, 507-520.
32. Siemens, G. (2010). What are Learning Analytics? Retrieved August 9, 2011, from http://www.elearnspace.org/blog/2010/08/25/what-are-learning-analytics/
33. st conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2011 (pp. 1-185). New York, NY: ACM.
34. Stahl, G. (2009). Studying virtual math teams. New York, NY: Springer
35. Stamper, J. C., Koedinger, K. R., Baker, R. S. J. D., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., Rankin, J., & Demi, S. (2010). PSLC DataShop: A data analysis service for the learning science community. In V. Aleven et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 455-456). Berlin: Springer.
36. Treloar, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2008). Access to data for eResearch: Designing the Australian national data service discovery services. International Journal of Digital Curation, 3(2), 151-158.
37. st Learning Analytics & Knowledge Conference (pp. 44-53). New York, NY: ACM.