Productive re-use of CSCL data and analytic tools to provide a new perspective on group cohesion

Connecting Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning to Policy and Practice: CSCL 2011 Conf. Proc. - Short Papers and Posters, 9th International Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conf.

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 846-850

  Reffay, Christophe ^a   Teplovs, Christopher ^b   Blondel, François Marie ^a  

^a STEF Research Team   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC TOOLS; CLIQUE SIZE; COMPLEMENTARY ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC REPRESENTATION; GROUP COHESIONS; KNOWLEDGE SPACES; SOCIAL COHESION; STRONG CONVERGENCE; VISUALIZERS;

COMMUNICATION; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; PUBLISHING;

ADHESION;

EID: 84858376100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (1999). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21, 375-395.
2. Chan, T., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., et al. (2006). One-to-one technologyenhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(1), 3-29.
3. de Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Investigating patterns of interaction in networked learning and computer-supported collaborative learning: A role for Social Network Analysis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 87-103.
4. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239.
5. Fujita, N., & Teplovs, C. (2010). Software-based scaffolding: Supporting the development of knowledge building discourse in online courses. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Learning in the Disciplines: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (ICLS 2010) -Volume 1, Full Papers (pp. 1056-1062). Chicago, IL: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
6. Giguet, E., Lucas, N., Blondel, F.-M., & Bruillard, É. (2009). Share and explore discussion forum objects on the Calico website. In A. Dimitracopoulou, C. O'Malley, D. Suthers & P. Reimann (Eds.), Computer Supported Collaborative Learning Practices: CSCL 09 Community Events Proceedings (pp. 174-176): International Society of the Learning Sciences.
7. King, G. (2007). An Introduction to the Dataverse Network as an Infrastructure for Data Sharing. Sociological Methods & Research, 36(2), 173-199.
8. Koedinger, K., Baker, R. S. J. d., Cunningham, K., Skogsholm, A., Leber, B., & Stamper, J. (2010). A Data Repository for the EDM community: The PSLC DataShop. In C. Romero, S. Ventura, M. Pechenizkiy & R. S. J. d. Baker (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Data Mining. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
9. Liao, J., Li, Y., Wang, J., Huang, R., & Zhang, Z. (2007). A systemic model of interaction analysis in CSCL. In V. Uskov (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th IASTED International Conference on Computers and Advanced Technology in Education (pp. 463-469). Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
10. Martínez, A., de la Fuente, P., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2003). Towards an xml-based representation of collaborative action. In B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments: Proceedings CSCL'2003. (pp. 379-383). Bergen, Norway: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gomez, E., & de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353-368.
12. Martínez, A., Harrer, A., & Barros, B. (2005). Library of Interaction Analysis Tools. Deliverable D.31.2 of the JEIRP IA (Jointly Executed Integrated Research Project on Interaction Analysis Supporting Teachers & Students' Self-regulation). .
13. Nurmela, K., Lehtinen, E., & Palonen, T. (1999). Evaluating CSCL log files by social network analysis. . In C. Hoadley & J. Roschelle (Eds.), CSCL 1999. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
14. Osuna, C., Dimitriadis, Y., & Martínez, A. (2001). Using a Theoretical Framework for the Evaluation of Sequentiability, Reusability and Complexity of Development in CSCL Applications. In P. Dillenbourg, A. Eurelings & K. Hakkarainen (Eds.), Proceedings of EuroCSCL 2001. Maastricht, NL.
15. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological Aspects of Natural Language Use: Our Words, Our Selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547-577. (Pubitemid 37417505)
16. Rafaeli, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1996). Networked Interactivity. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 2(4).
17. Reffay, C., & Betbeder, M.-L. (2009). Sharing Corpora and Tools to Improve Interaction Analysis. Proceedings of the 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Learning in the Synergy of Multiple Disciplines. (pp. 196-210).
18. Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In B. Wason, S. Ludvigson & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning. Proceedings of the international conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 2003. (pp. 343-352). Bergen, Norway: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
19. Wang, Y., & Li, K. (2006). An application of social network analysis in evaluation of CSCL. In R. Mizoguchi, P. Dillenbourg & Z. Zhu (Eds.), Learning by effective utilization of technologies: Facilitating intercultural understanding: IOS Press.
20. Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social networks. Science, 293, 2031-2034. (Pubitemid 32848041)
21. Yates, S. J. (1996). Oral and Written Linguistic Aspects of Computer Conferencing: A Corpus Based Study. In S. C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-Mediated Communication. Linguistic, Social and Cross-Cultural Perspectives (pp. 29-46). Amsterdam, NL: John Benjamins.