Teacher judgment of reading performance

Developments in Educational Psychology, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 196-216

  Madelaine, Alison ^a   Wheldall, Kevin ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84869483463     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203874677     Document Type: Chapter

References (85)

1. Adelman, H. and Feshbach, S. (1971). Predicting reading failure: Beyond the readiness model. Exceptional Children, 37, 349-54.
2. Airasian, P. W., Kellaghan, T., Madaus, G. F. and Pedulla, J. J. (1977). Proportion and direction of teacher rating changes of pupils' progress attributable to standardized test information. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 702-9.
3. Baker, S. K. and Good, R. (1995). Curriculum-based measurement of English reading with bilingual Hispanic students: A validation study with second-grade students. School Psychology Review, 24: 561-78.
4. Bates, C. and Nettlebeck, T. (2001). Primary school teachers' judgements of reading achievement. Educational Psychology, 21: 179-89.
5. Borg, W. R. and Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research: An introduction, 5th ed. NewYork: Longman.
6. Borko, H., Shavelsen, R. J. and Stern, P. (1981). Teachers' decisions in the planning of reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 16: 449-66.
7. Cadwell, J. and Jenkins, J. (1986). Teachers' judgments about their students: The effect of cognitive simplification strategies on the rating process. American Educational Research Journal, 23: 460-75.
8. Coladarci, T. (1986). Accuracy of teacher judgments of student responses to standardized test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78: 141-6.
9. Coladarci, T. (1992). Teachers' knowledge of what students' know: The case of reading. Reading Improvement, 29: 34-9.
10. Coleman, J. M. and Dover, G. M. (1989). Rating Inventory for Screening Kindergarteners. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
11. Coleman, J. M. and Dover, G. M. (1993). The RISK screening test: Using kindergarten teachers' ratings to predict further placement in resource rooms. Exceptional Children, 59: 468-77.
12. Degrees of Reading Power Services. (1988). Degrees of reading power norms: All forms. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
13. Deno, S. L. (1987). Curriculum-based measurement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20: 41-2.
14. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K. and Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49: 36-45.
15. Doherty, J. and Conolly, M. (1985). How accurately can primary school teachers predict the scores of their pupils in standardised tests of attainment? A study of some noncognitive factors that influence specific judgements. Educational Studies, 11: 41-60.
16. Dunn, L. and Markwardt, F. (1970). Peabody Individual AchievementTest. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17. Dunn, L. M. and Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18. Durost, W. N. (ed.). (1959). Directions for Administering the Metropolitan Achievement Tests. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
19. Eaves, R. C., Williams, P., Winchester, K. and Darch, C. (1994). Using teacher judgment and IQ to estimate reading and mathematics achievement in a remedial-reading program. Psychology in the Schools, 31: 261-72.
20. Educational Research Centre. (1973). Drumcondra Test Series. Dublin: Educational Research Centre, St Patricks College.
21. Farr, R. and Roelke, P. (1971). Measuring subskills of reading: Intercorrelations between standardised reading tests, teachers' ratings, and reading specialists' ratings. Journal of Educational Measurement, 8: 27-32.
22. Feshbach, S., Adelman, H. and Fuller, W. (1977). Prediction of reading and related academic problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 69: 299-308.
23. Fewster, S. and MacMillan, P. D. (2002). School-based evidence for the validity of curriculum-based measurement of reading and writing. Remedial and Special Education, 23: 149-56.
24. Fletcher, J., Tannock, R. and Bishop, D. V. M. (2001). Utility of brief teacher rating scales to identify children with educational problems. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53: 63-71.
25. Flynn, J. M. (1977). Teacher Rating Scale. LaCrosse, WI: Lacrosse Area Dyslexia Institute.
26. Flynn, J. M. and Rahbar, M. H. (1998). Improving teacher prediction of children at risk for reading failure. Psychology in the Schools, 35: 163-72.
27. Freeman, J. G. (1993). Two factors contributing to elementary school teachers' predictions of students' scores on the Gates-MacGinitie Reading Test, Level D. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76: 536-8.
28. Fuchs, L. S. and Deno, S. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58: 232-42.
29. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D. and Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9: 20-8.
30. Gaines, M. L. and Davis, M. (1990). 'Accuracy of teacher prediction of elementary school achievement'. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April.
31. Gates, A. I. and MacGinitie, W. H. (1965). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
32. Gerber, M. M. and Semmel, M. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19: 137-48.
33. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34: 581-6.
34. Gottlieb, J. and Weinberg, S. (1999). Comparison of students referred and not referred for special education. The Elementary School Journal, 99: 187-99.
35. Gresham, F. M., Reschly, D. J. and Carey, M. P. (1987). Teachers as 'tests': Classification accuracy and concurrent validation in the identification of learning disabled children. School Psychology Review, 16: 543-3.
36. Gresham, F. M., MacMillan, D. L. and Bocian, K. M. (1997). Teachers as 'tests': Differential validity of teacher judgments in identifying students at-risk for learning difficulties. School Psychology Review, 26: 47-60.
37. Hartman, J. M. and Fuller, M. L. (1997). The development of curriculum-based measurement norms in literature-based classrooms. Journal of School Psychology, 35: 377-89.
38. Hasbrouk, J. E. and Tindal, G. (1992). Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, 24: 41-4.
39. Helmke, A. and Schrader, F.-W. (1987). Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgement accuracy on achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3: 91-8.
40. Hoge, R. D. (1983). Psychometric properties of teacher-judgment measures of pupil aptitudes, classroom behaviours, and achievement levels. The Journal of Special Education, 17: 401-29.
41. Hoge, R. D. and Butcher, R. (1984). Analysis of teacher judgments of pupil achievement levels. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76: 777-81.
42. Hoge, R. D. and Coladarci, T. (1989). Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 59: 297-313.
43. Hopkins, K. D., George, C. A. and Williams, D. D. (1985). The concurrent validity of standardized achievement tests by content area using teacher's ratings as criteria. Journal of Educational Measurement, 22: 177-82.
44. Humphries, T., Koltun, H., Malone, M. and Roberts, W. (1994). Teacher-identified oral language difficulties among boys with attention problems. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 15: 92-8.
45. Jenkins, J. R. and Jewell, M. (1993). Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59: 421-32.
46. Jorgensen, G. W. (1975). An analysis of teacher judgments of reading level. American Educational Research Journal, 12: 67-75.
47. Kapelis, L. (1975). Early identification of reading failure: A comparison of two screening tests and teacher forecasts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8: 638-41.
48. Karlsen, B. and Gardner, E. (1985). Stanford Diagnostic Reading Test, 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
49. Kastner, J. and Gottlieb, J. (1991). Classification of children in special education: Importance of pre-assessment information. Psychology in the Schools, 28: 19-27.
50. Kenny, D. T. and Chekaluk, E. (1993). Early reading performance: A comparison of teacher-based and test-based assessments. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26: 227-336.
51. Leinhardt, G. (1983). Novice and expert knowledge of individual student's achievement. Educational Psychologist, 18: 165-79.
52. MacGinitie, W. H., Kamons, J., Kowalski, R. L., MacGinitie, R. K. and MacKay, T. (1978). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Don Mills, ON: Thomas Nelson.
53. MacGinitie, W. H., Kamons, J., Kowalski, R. L., MacGinitie, R. K. and MacKay, T. (1980). Gates-MacGinitie reading test, Canadian edition-teacher's manual. Toronto, ON: Nelson Canada.
54. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (1998). Towards a curriculum-based passage reading test for monitoring the performance of low-progress readers using standardised passages: A validity study. Educational Psychology, 18: 471-8.
55. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (1999). Curriculum-based measurement of reading: A critical review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 46: 71-85.
56. Madelaine, A. andWheldall, K. (2002a). A comparison of two quick methods for identifying low-progress readers: Teacher judgment versus curriculum-based measurement. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 1/2: 32-47.
57. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (2002b). Establishing tentative norms and identifying gender differences in performance for a new passage reading test. Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 7: 40-5.
58. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (2002c). Further progress towards a standardised curriculum-based measure of reading: Calibrating a new passage reading test against the New South Wales Basic Skills Test. Educational Psychology, 22: 461-71.
59. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (2003). Can teachers discriminate low-progress readers from average readers in regular classes? Australian Journal of Learning Disabilities, 8: 4-7.
60. Madelaine, A. and Wheldall, K. (2005). Identifying low-progress readers: Comparing teacher judgment with a curriculum-based measurement procedure. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 52: 33-42.
61. Mantzicopoulos, P. Y. and Morrison, D. (1994). Early prediction of reading achievement: Exploring the relationship of cognitive and noncognitive measures to inaccurate classification of at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education, 15: 244-51.
62. Marston, D., Mirkin, P. and Deno, S. L. (1984). Curriculum-based measurement: An alternative to traditional screening, referral and identification. The Journal of Special Education, 18: 109-17.
63. McCullough, C. M. (1963). McCullough word analysis tests. Boston: Ginn.
64. Mehrens, W. A. and Clarizio, H. F. (1993). Curriculum-based measurement: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 30: 241-54.
65. Morgan, S. K. and Bradley-Johnson, S. (1995). Technical adequacy of curriculum-based measurement for braille readers. School Psychology Review, 24: 94-103.
66. Morrison, D., Mantzicopoulos, P. Y. and Stone, E. (1988). Screening for reading problems: The utility of SEARCH. Annals of Dyslexia, 38: 181-92.
67. Nash, R. (1973). Classrooms observed. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
68. Neale, M. D. (1988). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability-Revised. Melbourne: Australian Council of Educational Research.
69. Oliver, J. E. and Arnold, R. D. (1978). Comparing a standardized test, an informal reading inventory and teacher judgment on third grade reading. Reading Improvement, 15: 56-9.
70. Patton, C. V. (1976). Selecting special students: Who decides? Teachers College Record, 78: 101-24.
71. Rodden-Nord, K. and Shinn, M. R. (1991). The range of reading skills within and across general education classrooms: Contributions to understanding special education for students with mild handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 24: 441-53.
72. Salvesen, K. A. and Undheim, J. O. (1994). Screening for learning disabilities with teacher rating scales. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27: 60-6.
73. Science Research Associates Inc. (1978). SRA Achievement Series. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
74. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H. and Secord, W. (1989). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals-revised: Screening test. USA: Psychological Corporation.
75. Sharpley, C. F. and Edgar, E. (1986). Teachers' ratings vs standardized tests: An empirical investigation of agreement between two indices of achievement. Psychology in the Schools, 23: 106-11.
76. Shinn, M. R., Tindal, G. A. and Spira, D. A. (1987). Special education referrals as an index of teacher tolerance: Are teachers imperfect tests? Exceptional Children, 54: 32-40.
77. Tiegs, E. W. and Clark, W. W. (1963). California Reading Tests. Monterey, CA: California Test Bureau.
78. Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children-Revised. NY: Psychological Corporation.
79. Westwood, P. (1999). Spelling: Approaches to teaching and assessment. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research.
80. Wheldall, K. and Madelaine, A. (2000). A curriculum-based passage reading test for monitoring the performance of low-progress readers: The development of theWARP. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47: 371-82.
81. Wheldall, K. and Madelaine, A. (2006). The development of a passage reading test for the frequent monitoring of performance of low-progress readers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 30: 72-85.
82. Wilson, M. S., Schendel, J. M. and Ulman, J. E. (1992). Curriculum-based measures, teachers' ratings, and group achievement scores: Alternative screening measures. Journal of School Psychology, 30: 59-76.
83. Woodcock, R. W. (1987). Woodcock Reading Mastery Test-Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
84. Wright, D. andWiese, M. J. (1988). Teacher judgment in student evaluation: A comparison of grading methods. Journal of Educational Research, 82: 10-14.
85. Wright, E. N. (1967). Canadian Lorge-Thorndike Intelligence Test. Don Mills, ON: Thomas Nelson.