Curriculum-based measurement of reading: A critical review

International Journal of Disability, Development and Education

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 71-85

  Madelaine, Alison ^a   Wheldall, Kevin ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749827068     PISSN: 1034912X     EISSN: 1465346X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/103491299100731     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. BORG, W-R., and GALL, M.D., 1989. Educational research: An introduction, (5th ed.), New York: Longman.
2. CARVER, R.P., 1992. What do standardised tests of reading comprehension measure in terms of efficiency, accuracy, and rate?. Reading Research Quarterly, 27: 347–359.
3. CHALL, J.S., 1983. Stages of reading development, New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. DEMO, S.L., 1985. Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52: 219–232.
5. DENO, S.L., 1987. Curriculum-based measurement. Teaching Exceptional Children, 20: 41–42.
6. DENO, S.L., and FUCHS, L.S., 1987. Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(8): 1–16.
7. DEMO, S.L., MARSTON, D., and MIRKIN, P., 1982. Valid measurement procedures for continuous evaluation of written expression. Exceptional Children, 46: 368–371.
8. DEMO, S.L., MIRKIN, P.K., and CHIANG, B., 1982. Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49: 36–45.
9. DENO, S.L., MIRKIN, P.K., and WESSON, C., 1984. How to write effective data-based IEPs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 16: 99–104.
10. DUFFELMEYER, F.A., 1983. Response to Fuchs, Fuchs and Deno. Reading Research Quarterly, 18: 370–371.
11. FUCHS, L-S., 1989. “ Evaluating solutions: Monitoring progress and revising intervention plans ”. In Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, Edited by: SHINN, M.R., 158–181. New York: The Guilford Press.
12. FUCHS, L.S., and DENO, S.L., 1991. Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57: 488–500.
13. FUCHS, L.S., and DENO, S.L., 1992. Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58: 232–242.
14. FUCHS, L.S., and DENO, S.L., 1994. Must instructionally useful performance assessment be based in the curriculum?. Exceptional Children, 61: 15–24.
15. FUCHS, L.S., DENO, S.L., and MIRKIN, P.K., 1984. The effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21: 440–460.
16. FUCHS, L.S., and FUCHS, D., 1986. Effects of systematic formative evaluation: A meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 53: 199–208.
17. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., and HAMLETT, C.L., 1989a. Effects of instrumental use of curriculumbased measurement to enhance instructional programs. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2): 43–52.
18. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., and HAMLETT, C.L., 1989b. Monitoring reading growth using student recalls: Effects of two teacher feedback systems. Journal of Educational Research, 83: 103–110.
19. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., HAMLETT, C.M., and ALLINDER, R.M., 1991. The contribution of skills analysis to curriculum-based measurement in spelling. Exceptional Children, 57: 443–452.
20. FUCHS, L-S., FUCHS, D., HAMLETT, C-L., PHlLLlPS, N-B., and BENTZ, J., 1994. Classwide curriculum-based measurement: Helping general educators meet the challenge of student diversity. Exceptional Children, 60: 518–537.
21. FUCHS, L.S., FUCHS, D., and MAXWELL, L., 1988. The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2): 20–28.
22. GALAGAN, J.E., 1985. Psychoeducational testing: Turn out the lights, the party's over. Exceptional Children, 52: 288–299.
23. GALBRAITH, E., and CLAYTON, M., 1997. An investigation of the oral reading fluency of grade 4 students. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 21: 98–114.
24. GOYEN, J.D., 1977. Adult illiteracy in Sydney, Canberra: Australian Association of Adult Education.
25. GRAFF, H., 1995. The labyrinths of literacy: Reflections on literacy past and present, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
26. HASBROUK, J.E., and TINDAL, G., 1992. Curriculum-based oral reading fluency norms for students in grades 2 through 5. Teaching Exceptional Children, Spring: 41–44.
27. HINTZE, J.M., SHAPIRO, E.S., and LUTZ, J.G., 1994. The effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of curriculum-based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 28: 188–202.
28. HOWELL, K.W., FOX, S.L., and MOREHEAD, M.K., 1993. Curriculum-based evaluation: Teaching and decision making, (2nd ed.), Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
29. JENKINS, J.R., and JEWELL, M., 1993. Examining the validity of two measures for formative teaching: Reading aloud and maze. Exceptional Children, 59: 421–432.
30. KNUTSON, N., and SHINN, M., 1991. Curriculum-based measurement: Conceptual underpinnings and integration into problem solving assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 29: 371–393.
31. LABERGE, D., and SAMUELS, S.J., 1974. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6: 293–323.
32. LUKE, A., and GILBERT, P., 1993. Literacy in contexts: Australian perspectives and issues, St Leonards, NSW: Alien & Unwin.
33. MARSTON, D., FUCHS, L. S., and DENO, S.L., 1986. Measuring pupil progress: A comparison of standardised achievement tests and curriculum-related measures. Diagnostique, 11: 77–90.
34. MARSTON, D., and MAGNUSSON, D., 1988. “ Curriculum-based measurement: District level implementation ”. In Alternative education delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students, Edited by: GRADEN, J., ZINS, J., and CURTIS, M., 137–172. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
35. MARSTON, D.B., 1989. “ A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What is it and why do it? ”. In Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, Edited by: SHINN, M.R., 18–78. New York: The Guilford Press.
36. McCURDY, B.L., and SHAPIRO, E.S., 1992. A comparison of teacher-, peer-, and self-monitoring with curriculum-based measurement in reading among students with learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 26: 162–180.
37. MEHRENS, W.A., and CLARIZIO, H.F., 1993. Curriculum-based measurement: Conceptual and psychometric considerations. Psychology in the Schools, 30: 241–254.
38. PARKER, R., HASEROUK, J.E., and TINDAL, G., 1992. Greater validity for oral reading fluency: Can miscues help?. Journal of Special Education, 25: 492–503.
39. POTTER, M.L., and WAMRE, H.M., 1990. Curriculum-based measurement and developmental reading models: Opportunities for cross-validation. Exceptional Children, 57: 16–25.
40. RADENCICH, M.C., ed. 1994. Adult literacy: A compendium of articles from the Journal of Reading, Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
41. RESCHLY, DJ., KICKLIGHTER, R., and MCKEE, P., 1988a. Recent placement litigation: Part II. Minority EMR overrepresentation: Comparison of Larry P. (1979, 1984, 1986) with Marshall (1984, 1985) and S-I (1986). School Psychology Review, 27: 22–38.
42. RESCHLY, DJ., KICKLIGHTER, R., and MCKEE, P., 1988b. Recent placement litigation: Part III. Analysis of differences in Larry P., Marshall and S-1 and implications for future practices. School Psychology Review, 27: 39–50.
43. RODDBN-NORD, K., and SHINN, M.R., 1991. The range of reading skills within and across general education classrooms: Contributions to understanding special education for students with mild handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 24: 441–453.
44. SHINN, M.R., 1988. Development of curriculum-based local norms for use in special education decision-making. School Psychology Review, 17: 61–80.
45. SHINN, M.R., ed. 1989. Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children, New York: The Guilford Press.
46. SHINN, M.R., and HUBBARD, D., 1992. Curriculum-based measurement and problem solving assessment: Basic procedures and outcomes. Focus on Exceptional Children, 24(5): 1–20.
47. SHINN, M-R., KNUTSON, N., GOOD, R-H., TILLY, W-D., and COLLINS, V., 1992. Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21: 459–479.
48. STONER, G., CAREY, S.P., IKEDA, M.J., and SHINN, M.R., 1994. The utility of curriculum-based measurement for evaluating the effects of methylphenidate on academic performance. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis, 27: 101–113.
49. SWAIN, K.D., and ALLINDBR, R.M., 1996. The effects of repeated reading on two types of CBM: Computer maze and oral reading with second-grade students with learning disabilities. Diagnostique, 21: 51–66.
50. TAYLOR, R.L., WILLTTS, P.P., and RICHARDS, S.B., 1988. Curriculum-based assessment: Considerations and concerns. Diagnostique, 14: 14–21.
51. THURLOW, M.L., and YSSBLDYKE, J.E., 1982. Instructional planning: Information collected by school psychologists vs. information considered useful by teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 20(1): 3–10.
52. TUCKER, J.A., 1985. Curriculum-based assessment: An introduction. Exceptional Children, 52: 199–204.
53. TUCKER, J.A., 1987. Curriculum-based assessment is no fad. The Collaborative Educator, 1(4): 4–10.
54. WHELDALL, K., 1996. “ The Wheldall Assessment of Reading Passages (WARP): Experimental Edition ”. Sydney: Macquarie University Special Education Centre. Unpublished manuscript
55. WHELDALL, K., CENTER, Y., and FREEMAN, L., 1993. Reading recovery in Sydney primary schools. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 17: 51–63.
56. WHELDALL, K., and MADELAINE, A., 1997. Should we measure reading progress and if so how? Extrapolating the curriculum-based measurement model for monitoring low progress readers. Special Education Perspectives, 6: 29–35.