Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time

PLoS ONE

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2012, Pages

  Lazard, Diane S ^a   Vincent, Christophe ^b   Venail, Frédéric ^c   van de Heyning, Paul ^d   Truy, Eric ^e   Sterkers, Olivier ^f   Skarzynski, Piotr H ^g,h   Skarzynski, Henryk ^g   Schauwers, Karen ⁱ   O'Leary, Stephen ^j   Mawman, Deborah ^k   Maat, Bert ^l   Kleine Punte, Andrea ^d   Huber, Alexander M ^m   Green, Kevin ^k   Govaerts, Paul J ⁱ   Fraysse, Bernard ⁿ   Dowell, Richard ^j   Dillier, Norbert ^m   Burke, Elaine ^o   Beynon, Andy ^p   Bergeron, François ^q   Başkent, Deniz ^l,r   Artières, Françoise ^c,s   Blamey, Peter J ^a,j   more..

^a Bionics Institute   (Australia)

^b LILLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^c GUI DE CHAULIAC HOSPITAL   (France)

^d ANTWERP UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^e EDOUARD HERRIOT HOSPITAL   (France)

^f BEAUJON HOSPITAL   (France)

^g INSTITUTE OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PATHOLOGY OF HEARING   (Poland)

^h Institute of Sensory Organs   (Poland)

ⁱ Ear Group   (Belgium)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^l UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^m UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ZURICH   (Switzerland)

ⁿ CHU PURPAN   (France)

^o ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^p RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^q UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^r UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^s Institut Saint Pierre   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DEVICE THERAPY; DISEASE DURATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; ELECTRODE; FEMALE; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NOISE; ONSET AGE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PURE TONE AUDIOMETRY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; FEMALE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84869075154     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Blamey P, Arndt P, Bergeron F, Bredberg G, Brimacombe J, et al. (1996) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 1: 293-306.
2. Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Truy E, Giraud AL, (2012) Bilateral reorganization of posterior temporal cortices in post-lingual deafness and its relation to cochlear implant outcome. Hum Brain Mapp DOI:10.1002/hbm.21504.
3. Cullen RD, Higgins C, Buss E, Clark M, Pillsbury HC 3rd, et al. (2004) Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing. Laryngoscope 114: 2218-2223.
4. Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ, (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20: 445-452.
5. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B, Knecht R, Gall V, et al. (1998) Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss-implications for patient selection. Audiology 37: 382-395.
6. Lenarz T, (1998) Cochlear implants: selection criteria and shifting borders. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 52: 183-199.
7. Dooley GJ, Blamey PJ, Seligman PM, Alcantara JI, Clark GM, et al. (1993) Combined electrical and acoustical stimulation using a bimodal prosthesis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119: 55-60.
8. Blamey PJ, (2005) Adaptive dynamic range optimization (ADRO): a digital amplification strategy for hearing aids and cochlear implants. Trends Amplif 9: 77-98.
9. Johnson JA, Cox RM, Alexander GC, (2010) Development of APHAB norms for WDRC hearing aids and comparisons with original norms. Ear Hear 31: 47-55.
10. McDermott HJ, (2011) A technical comparison of digital frequency-lowering algorithms available in two current hearing AIDS. PLoS One 6: e22358.
11. Potts LG, Skinner MW, Litovsky RA, Strube MJ, Kuk F, (2009) Recognition and localization of speech by adult cochlear implant recipients wearing a digital hearing aid in the nonimplanted ear (bimodal hearing). J Am Acad Audiol 20: 353-373.
12. Sucher CM, McDermott HJ, (2009) Bimodal stimulation: benefits for music perception and sound quality. Cochlear Implants Int 10 (Suppl 1):: 96-99.
13. Champoux F, Lepore F, Gagne JP, Theoret H, (2009) Visual stimuli can impair auditory processing in cochlear implant users. Neuropsychologia 47: 17-22.
14. Lambertz N, Gizewski ER, de Greiff A, Forsting M, (2005) Cross-modal plasticity in deaf subjects dependent on the extent of hearing loss. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 25: 884-890.
15. Friedland DR, Runge-Samuelson C, (2009) Soft cochlear implantation: rationale for the surgical approach. Trends Amplif 13: 124-138.
16. Addams-Williams J, Munaweera L, Coleman B, Shepherd R, Backhouse S, (2011) Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach. Cochlear Implants Int 12 (Suppl 2):: S36-39.
17. Souter MA, Briggs RJ, Wright CG, Roland PS, (2011) Round window insertion of precurved perimodiolar electrode arrays: how successful is it? Otol Neurotol 32: 58-63.
18. Skarzynski H, Lorens A, Piotrowska A, Skarzynski PH, (2010) Hearing preservation in partial deafness treatment. Med Sci Monit 16: CR555-562.
19. Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK, Whiting BR, Chole RA, et al. (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29: 920-928.
20. Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK, Harding GW, Smith PG, et al. (2002) CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in Nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3: 332-350.
21. Yukawa K, Cohen L, Blamey P, Pyman B, Tungvachirakul V, et al. (2004) Effects of insertion depth of cochlear implant electrodes upon speech perception. Audiol Neurootol 9: 163-172.
22. Blamey PJ, Pyman BC, Gordon M, Clark GM, Brown AM, et al. (1992) Factors predicting postoperative sentence scores in postlinguistically deaf adult cochlear implant patients. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 101: 342-348.
23. Pisoni DB, Kronenberger WG, Roman AS, Geers AE, (2011) Measures of digit span and verbal rehearsal speed in deaf children after more than 10 years of cochlear implantation. Ear Hear 32: 60S-74S.
24. Group UCIS (2004) Criteria of candidacy for unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults I: theory and measures of effectiveness. Ear Hear 25: 310-335.
25. Chen JM, Shipp D, Al-Abidi A, Ng A, Nedzelski JM, (2001) Does choosing the "worse" ear for cochlear implantation affect outcome? Otol Neurotol 22: 335-339.
26. Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK, (2005) Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 26: 7S-16S.
27. van den Broek E, Dunnebier EA, (2009) Cochlear implantation in postlingually hearing-impaired adults: choosing the most appropriate ear. Int J Audiol 48: 618-624.
28. Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Skinner MW, (2009) Speech recognition in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of standard HiRes and HiRes 120 sound processing. Otol Neurotol 30: 146-152.
29. Olson AD, Shinn JB, (2008) A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of using amplification in conjunction with cochlear implantation. J Am Acad Audiol 19: 657-671; quiz 735.
30. O'Leary MJ, Fayad J, House WF, Linthicum FH Jr, (1991) Electrode insertion trauma in cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100: 695-699.
31. Skinner MW, Holden TA, Whiting BR, Voie AH, Brunsden B, et al. (2007) In vivo estimates of the position of advanced bionics electrode arrays in the human cochlea. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 197: 2-24.
32. Radeloff A, Mack M, Baghi M, Gstoettner WK, Adunka OF, (2008) Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes. Otol Neurotol 29: 131-136.
33. Verbist BM, Joemai RM, Teeuwisse WM, Veldkamp WJ, Geleijns J, et al. (2008) Evaluation of 4 multisection CT systems in postoperative imaging of a cochlear implant: a human cadaver and phantom study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29: 1382-1388.
34. Zeng F-G (2011) Advances in Auditory Prostheses. In: Zeng F, Popper A, Fay R, editors. Auditory Prostheses: New Horizons: Springer Handbook of Auditory Research 39. pp. 1-11.
35. Loizou PC, (2006) Speech processing in vocoder-centric cochlear implants. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 64: 109-143.
36. Hamacher V, Doering WH, Mauer G, Fleischmann H, Hennecke J, (1997) Evaluation of noise reduction systems for cochlear implant users in different acoustic environment. Am J Otol 18: S46-49.
37. Loizou PC, Lobo A, Hu Y, (2005) Subspace algorithms for noise reduction in cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 118: 2791-2793.
38. Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK, (2003) Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 24: 582-589.
39. Morris LG, Mallur PS, Roland JT Jr, Waltzman SB, Lalwani AK, (2007) Implication of central asymmetry in speech processing on selecting the ear for cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 28: 25-30.
40. Lazard DS, Collette JL, Perrot X, (2012) Speech processing: From peripheral to hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory system. Laryngoscope 122: 167-173.
41. Lazard DS, Giraud AL, Truy E, Lee HJ, (2011) Evolution of non-speech sound memory in postlingual deafness: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation. Neuropsychologia 49: 2475-2482.
42. Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Gaebler M, Kell CA, Truy E, et al. (2010) Phonological processing in post-lingual deafness and cochlear implant outcome. Neuroimage 49: 3443-3451.
43. Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Loiselle LH, (2007) Performance of patients using different cochlear implant systems: effects of input dynamic range. Ear Hear 28: 260-275.
44. Giraud AL, Lee HJ, (2007) Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25: 381-390.
45. Strelnikov K, Rouger J, Demonet JF, Lagleyre S, Fraysse B, et al. (2010) Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear implantation. Cereb Cortex 20: 1217-1222.