Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss—implications for patient selection

International Journal of Audiology

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 1998, Pages 382-395

  Kiefer, Jan ^a   von Ilberg, Christoph ^a   Reimer, Bärbel ^a   Knecht, Rainald ^a   Gall, Volker ^a   Diller, Gottfried ^b   Stürzebecher, Ekkehard ^a   Pfennigdorff, Thomas ^a   Spelsberg, Anja ^a  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b Rhein/Main ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

Auditory pathway; Cochlear implant; Hearing preservation; Indications; Residual hearing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEARING LOSS; HEARING TEST; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH AND LANGUAGE; STATISTICS; WORD RECOGNITION;

ADULT; AUDIOMETRY, PURE-TONE; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS, SENSORINEURAL; HUMANS; MALE; PATIENT SELECTION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 0032428921     PISSN: 14992027     EISSN: 17088186     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00206099809072991     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wilson B S, Finley C C, Lawson D T, Wolford R D, Eddington D K, Rabinowitz W M. Better speech recognition with cochlear implant. Nature, 1991; 236–238
2. Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Zerbi M, Finley C C, Wolford R D. New processing strategies in cochlear implantation. Am J Otol 1995; 16(5)669–675
3. Kessler D K, Schindler R A. Progress with a multi-strategy cochlear implant system: the Clarion TM. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J, Hochmair-Desoyer, E S, Hochmair. Mainz, Wien 1994; 354–362
4. Schindler R A, Kessler D K. Clarion cochlear implant: Phase I investigational results. Am J Otol, 1993; 263–272
5. Lenarz T, Battmer R D. Comparison of 5 different speech coding strategies in noise, Speak. Third Paris International Cochlear Implant Conference, 1995, Abstract
6. Battmer R D, Lenarz T. The performance of the Nucleus Spectra 22 and the Clarion CIS devices in quiet and in noise. Third Paris International Cochlear Implant Conference, 1995, Abstract
7. Skinner M W, Clark G M, Whitford L A, Seligman P M, Staller S J, Shipp D B, Shallop J K, Everingham C, Menapace C M, Arndt P L, et al. Evaluation of a new spectral peak coding strategy for the nucleus 22 channel cochlear implant system. Am J Otol 1994; 15: 15–27, (suppl. 2)
8. Dillier N, Battmer R D, Döring W H, Müller-Deile J. Multicentric field evaluation of a new speech coding strategy for cochlear implants. Audiology 1995; 34: 145–159
9. Kiefer J, Müller J, Pfennigdorff T, Schon F, Helms J, von Ilberg C, Baumgartner W, Gstöttner W, Ehrenberger K, Arnold W, Stephan K, Thumfarth W, Baur S. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS Speech coding strategy (MED-EL COMBI-40) compared to the Multipeak and spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 1996; 58: 127–135
10. Osberger M J, Miyamoto R T, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Kemink J, Stroer B S, Firszt J B, Novak M A. Independent evaluation of the speech perception abilities of children with the Nucleus 22-Channel Cochlear Implant System. Ear Hear 1991; 12: 66s–80s, (suppl.)
11. Miyamoto R T, Osberger M J, Robbins A M, Myres W A, Kessler K, Pope M L. Comparison of speech perception abilities in deaf children with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1991; 104: 42–46
12. Helms J, Müller J, Schön F, Moser L, Arnold W, Janssen T, Ramsden R, von Ilberg C, Kiefer J, et al. Evaluation of Performance with the COMBI 40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric study. ORL 1997; 59: 23–35
13. Kiefer J, Gall V, Desloovere C, Knecht R, Mikowski A, von Ilberg C. A follow up study of long term results after cochlear implantation in children and adolescents. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1996; 253: 158–166
14. Brimacombe J A, Arndt P L, Staller S J, Beiter A L. Multichannel cochlear implantation in adults with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I J, Hochmair-Desoyer, E, Hochmair. Manz, Wien 1994; 387–392
15. Shallop J K, Arndt P L, Turnacliff K A. Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. J Speech Lang Path 1992; 16(2)141–148
16. Rizer F M. Post operative audiometric evaluation of cochlear implant patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1988; 98: 203–206
17. Bogess W J, Baker J E, Balkany T J. Loss of residual hearing after cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 1002–1005
18. Lehnhardt E. Intracochlear placement of cochlear implant electrodes in soft surgery technique. HNO 1993; 41(7)356–359
19. Rogowski M, Reiss G, Lehnhardt E. Morphological study of the guinea pig cochlea after cochlear implantation using the ‘soft surgery’ technique. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1995; 166: 434–436, (suppl.)
20. Dye L, House W F, O'Connor C. Measurable residual hearing following cochlear implantation. Chicago. 1987, Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Otolaryngology HNS
21. Picton T W, Ouellette J, Hamel G, Smith A D. Brainstem evoked potentials to tonepips in notched noise. J Otolaryngol 1979; 8(4)289–314
22. Stürzebecher E, Heine S, Cebulla M, Wagner H, Schmiescheck J. Frequenzspezifische Hörschwellenmes-sung mittels Notched-noise-BERA bei Kindern. Otorhinolaryngol Nova 1995; 5: 300–306
23. Stürzebecher E. Rationelle Hörschwel-lenbestimmung mittels Tonpuls-BERA mit Notched-Noise-Maskier-ung. Audiologische Akustik 1993; 32: 164–176
24. Reid J, Lehnhurdt M. Speech perception test results for European children using the Nucleus cochlear implant. Advances in Cochlear Implants, I, Hochmair, E, Hochmair. Vienna, Manz, 522–527
25. Erber N P, Alencewicz C M. Audiologic evaluation of deaf children. J Speech Hear Dis, 1976; 256–267
26. Robbins A M, Renshaw J J, Berry S W. Evaluation of meaningful auditory information in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otol 1991; 12: 144–150, (suppl.)
27. Clark G M, Shute S A, Shepherd R K, Carter T D. Cochlear implantation: Osteoneogenesis, electrode-tissue impedance and residual hearing. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol (Suppl) 1995; 166: 40–42
28. Marean G C, Burt J M, Beecher M D, Rubel E W. Hair cell regeneration in the European starling (Sturnus vulgaris): recovery of pure-tone detection thresholds. Hear Res 1993; 71: 125–36, (l-2)
29. Cotanche D A, Lee K H, Stone J S, Picard D A. Hair cell regeneration in the bird cochlea following noise damage or ototoxic drug damage. Anat Embryol 1994; 189(1)1–18
30. Matsushima J I, Shepherd R K, Seldon H L, Xu S A, Clark G M. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in deaf kittens: Effect on cochlear nucleus morphology. Hear Res 1991; 56: 133–12
31. Chouard C H, Meyer B, Josset P, Buche J F. The effect of the acoustic nerve chronic electric stimulation upon the guinea pig cochlear nucleus development. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1983; 95: 639–645
32. Ni D, Seldon H L, Shepherd R K, Clark G M. Effect of chronic electrical stimulation on cochlear nucleus neuron size in normal hearing kittens. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1993; 113: 489–197
33. Leake P A, Snyder R L, Hradek G T, Rebscher S J. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats: effects of intensity and stimulating electrode location. Hear Res 1992; 64: 99–117
34. Klinke R, Krai A, Heid S, Hartmann R. Chronic cochlear implantation in the deaf white cat. ARO Midwinter Meeting Feb. 15-19, 1998, Abstract 870