A systematic review to determine the effectiveness of using amplification in conjunction with cochlear implantation

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology

Volumn 19, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 657-671

  Olson, Anne D ^a   Shinn, Jennifer B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bimodal; Cochlear implant; Evidence based practice; Hearing aid; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

BIMODAL STIMULATION; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEARING AID; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SPEECH ARTICULATION; SPEECH DISCRIMINATION; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEARING AIDS; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 65349175288     PISSN: 10500545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.19.9.2     Document Type: Review

References (58)

1. Abrams H, McArdle R, Hnath-Chisolm T. (2005) From outcomes to evidence: establishing best practices for audiologists. Semin Hear 26:157-169.
2. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. (2004) Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders: An Introduction. Technical Report. http://www.asha.org/members/deskref-journals/deskref/default.
3. Armstrong M, Pegg P, James C, Blamey P. (1997) Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid. Am J Otol 18:S140-141.
4. Bavelier D, Neville H. (2002) Cross modal plasticity: where and how? Nat Rev Neurosci 3:443-452.
5. Blamey P. (2005) Sound processing in hearing aids and CIs is gradually converging. Hear J 58:44-52.
6. Blamey PJ, Dooley GJ, James CJ, Parisi ES. (2000) Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing. Ear Hear 21:6-17.
7. Boothroyd A. (2006) Characteristics of listening environments: benefits of binaural hearing and implications for bilateral management. Int J Audiol 45, Suppl. 1:S12-19.
8. Bronkhorst AW, Plomp R. (1988) The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 83:1508-1516.
9. Carhart R. (1965) Monaural and binaural discrimination against competing sentences. Int J Audiol 4:5-10.
10. Castro A, Lassaletta L, Bastarrica M, Alfonso C, Prim MP, de Sarria MJ, Gavilan J. (2005) Quality of life in cochlear implanted patients. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp 56:192-197.
11. Ching TY. (2005) The evidence calls for making binaural -bimodal fittings routine. Hear J 58:32-41.
12. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M. (2004) Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 25:9-21.
13. Ching TY, van Wanrooy E, Hill M, Dillon H. (2005) Binaural redundancy and inter-aural time difference cues for patients wearing a cochlear implant and a hearing aid in opposite ears. Int J Audiol 44:513-521.
14. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJ, Abrams HB, Lesner S, McCarthy PA, Newman CW. (2007) A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force on the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol 18:151-183.
15. Clark GM. (2003) Cochlear Implants: Fundamentals and Applications. New York: Springer.
16. Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. (1993) A prospective, randomized study of cochlear implants. The Department of Veterans Affairs Cochlear Implant Study Group. N Engl J Med 328:233-237.
17. Cowan R, Chin-Lenn J. (2004) Pattern and prevalence of hearing aid use post-implantation in adult cochlear implant users. Aust N Z J Audiol Suppl. (May):48.
18. Cox RM. (2005) Evidence-based practice in provision of amplification. J Am Acad Audiol 16:419-438.
19. Cullen RD, Higgins C, Buss E, Clark M, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA. (2004) Cochlear implantation in patients with substantial residual hearing. Laryngoscope 114:2218-2223.
20. deJong R. (1994) Selecting and verifying hearing aid fittings for symmetrical hearing loss. In: Valente M, ed. Strategies for Selecting and Verifying Hearing Aid Fittings. New York: Thieme, 180-206.
21. Dunn CC, Tyler RS, Witt SA. (2005) Benefit of wearing a hearing aid on the unimplanted ear in adult users of a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48:668-680.
22. Festen JM, Plomp R. (1986) Speech-reception threshold in noise with one and two hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 79:465-471.
23. Francis HW, Yeagle JD, Bowditch S, Niparko JK. (2005) Cochlear implant outcome is not influenced by the choice of ear. Ear Hear 26, Suppl. 4:7S-16S.
24. Gantz BJ, Turner CW. (2003) Combining acoustic and electrical hearing. Laryngoscope 113:1726-1730.
25. Gelfand S. (1997) Essentials of Audiology. New York: Thieme.
26. Gelfand SA, Silman S, Ross L. (1987) Long-term effects of monaural, binaural and no amplification in subjects with bilateral hearing loss. Scand Audiol 16:201-207.
27. Hamzavi J, Baumgartner WD, Pok SM, Franz P, Gstoettner W. (2003) Variables affecting speech perception in postlingually deaf adults following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 123: 493-498.
28. Hamzavi J, Pok SM, Gstoettner W, Baumgartner WD. (2004) Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear. Int J Audiol 43: 61-65.
29. Hawkins DB. (2005) Effectiveness of counseling-based adult group aural rehabilitation programs: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 16:485-493.
30. Hirsh IJ. (1950) Binaural hearing aids: a review of some experiments. J Speech Disord 15:114-123.
31. Huck S, Cormier W. (1996) Reading Statistics and Research. New York: Harper Collins.
32. Kileny R, Snorrason R, Zwolan T, Macpherson E, Middlebrooks JC. (2004) Contralateral hearing aid benefit in patients with cochlear implants. Int Congress Ser 1273:231-234.
33. Kong YY, Cruz R, Jones JA, Zeng FG. (2004) Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear 25: 173-185.
34. Lou J. (2002) Searching for the evidence. In: Law M, ed. Evidence-Based Rehabilitation. New Jersey: Slack, 71-94.
35. Luntz M, Shpak T, Weiss H. (2005) Binaural-bimodal hearing: concomitant use of a unilateral cochlear implant and a contralateral hearing aid. Acta Otolaryngol 125:863-869.
36. MacDermid JC. (2004) An introduction to evidence-based practice for hand therapists. J Hand Ther 17:105-117.
37. Massaro DW, Cohen MM. (1999) Speech perception in perceivers with hearing loss: synergy of multiple modalities. J Speech Lang Hear Res 42:21-41.
38. Miller G, Nicely P. (1955) An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. J Acoust Soc Am 27:338-352.
39. Mok M, Grayden D, Dowell RC, Lawrence D. (2006) Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears. J Speech Lang Hear Res 49: 338-351.
40. Moore B. (2003) An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing. London: Academic Press.
41. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E. (2005) Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Acta Otolaryngol 125:596-606.
42. Mueller HG, Hall JW. (1998) Audiologist's Desk Reference. Vol. 2. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.
43. Mulrow CD, Tuley MR, Aguilar C. (1992) Sustained benefits of hearing aids. J Speech Hear Res 35:1402-1405.
44. Offeciers E, Morera C, Muller J, Huarte A, Shallop J, Cavalle L. (2005) International consensus on bilateral cochlear implants and bimodal stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 125:918-919.
45. Palmer CV, Nelson CT, Lindley GA 4th. (1998) The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am 103:1705-1721.
46. Qin MK, Oxenham AJ. (2003) Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers. J Acoust Soc Am 114:446-454.
47. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J 312:71-72.
48. Silman S, Silverman CA, Emmer MB, Gelfand SA. (1992) Adult-onset auditory deprivation. J Am Acad Audiol 3:390-396.
49. Silverman CA, Silman S, Emmer MB, Schoepflin JR, Lutolf JJ. (2006) Auditory deprivation in adults with asymmetric, sensorineural hearing impairment. J Am Acad Audiol 17:747-762.
50. Sweetow R, Palmer CV. (2005) Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence. J Am Acad Audiol 16:494-504.
51. Syka J. (2002) Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss, restoration of function, and during learning. Physiol Rev 82:601-636.
52. Threats TT. (2006) Towards an international framework for communication disorders: use of the ICF. J Commun Disord 39: 251-265.
53. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W. (2002) Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 23:98-105.
54. Valente M, Abrams HB, Benson D, Chisolm TH, Citron D, Hampton D. (2006) Guidelines for the audiologic management of adult hearing impairment. Audiol Today 18:32-36.
55. Walden TC, Walden BE. (2005) Unilateral versus bilateral amplification for adults with impaired hearing. J Am Acad Audiol 16:574-584.
56. Waltzman SB, Cohen NL, Shapiro WH. (1992) Sensory aids in conjunction with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 13:308-312.
57. World Health Organization. (2001) International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization.
58. Yueh B, Souza PE, McDowell JA, Collins MP, Loovis CF, Hedrick SC, Ramsey SD, Deyo RA. (2001) Randomized trial of amplification strategies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 127:1197-1204.