Speech processing: From peripheral to hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory system

Laryngoscope

Volumn 122, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 167-173

  Lazard, Diane S ^a,b   Collette, Jean Louis ^b   Perrot, Xavier ^b,c  

^a ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^c CENTRE HOSPITALIER LYON SUD   (France)

Author keywords

corpus callosum; dichotic listening; functional imaging; medial olivocochlear efferent system; presbycusis; spectro temporal resolution; Temporal integration windows

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; COGNITION; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; LEFT HEMISPHERE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PHONETICS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; RIGHT HEMISPHERE; SPEECH;

AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CORPUS CALLOSUM; HUMANS;

EID: 84355166493     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: 15314995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/lary.22370     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Tervaniemi M, Hugdahl K,. Lateralization of auditory-cortex functions. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 2003; 43: 231-246. (Pubitemid 37415115)
2. Nicholls ME,. Temporal processing asymmetries between the cerebral hemispheres: evidence and implications. Laterality 1996; 1: 97-137. (Pubitemid 126528697)
3. Eling P,. In: CiPL 4, ed. Reader in the History of Aphasia: From Franz Gall to Norman Geschwind. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins; 1994.
4. Philibert B, Veuillet E, Collet L,. Functional asymmetries of crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear efferent pathways in humans. Neurosci Lett 1998; 253: 99-102. (Pubitemid 28430632)
5. Thierry G, Giraud AL, Price C,. Hemispheric dissociation in access to the human semantic system. Neuron 2003; 38: 499-506. (Pubitemid 36579150)
6. Belin P, Zatorre RJ, Ahad P,. Human temporal-lobe response to vocal sounds. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13: 17-26. (Pubitemid 34183360)
7. Peretz I, Zatorre RJ,. Brain organization for music processing. Annu Rev Psychol 2005; 56: 89-114. (Pubitemid 40300780)
8. Schmitt JJ, Hartje W, Willmes K,. Hemispheric asymmetry in the recognition of emotional attitude conveyed by facial expression, prosody and propositional speech. Cortex 1997; 33: 65-81. (Pubitemid 27154112)
9. Corballis MC,. The evolution and genetics of cerebral asymmetry. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009; 364: 867-879.
10. Hickok G, Okada K, Barr W, et al. Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: evidence from Wada procedures. Brain Lang 2008; 107: 179-184.
11. Poeppel D,. The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time'. Speech Commun 2003; 41: 245-255.
12. Zatorre RJ, Belin P,. Spectral and temporal processing in human auditory cortex. Cereb Cortex 2001; 11: 946-953. (Pubitemid 32946228)
13. Brodal A,. Neurological Anatomy in Relation to Clinical Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1981.
14. Aitkin L,. The Auditory Midbrain. Clifton, NJ: Humana; 1986.
15. Formisano E, Kim DS, Di Salle F, van de Moortele PF, Ugurbil K, Goebel R,. Mirror-symmetric tonotopic maps in human primary auditory cortex. Neuron 2003; 40: 859-869. (Pubitemid 37431044)
16. Steinmetz H, Rademacher J, Huang YX, et al. Cerebral asymmetry: MR planimetry of the human planum temporale. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1989; 13: 996-1005. (Pubitemid 19286555)
17. Josse G, Kherif F, Flandin G, Seghier ML, Price CJ,. Predicting language lateralization from gray matter. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 13516-13523.
18. Gannon PJ, Holloway RL, Broadfield DC, Braun AR,. Asymmetry of chimpanzee planum temporale: humanlike pattern of Wernicke's brain language area homolog. Science 1998; 279: 220-222. (Pubitemid 28103878)
19. Winer JA,. Decoding the auditory corticofugal systems. Hear Res 2006; 212: 1-8. (Pubitemid 43254931)
20. Perrot X, Ryvlin P, Isnard J, et al. Evidence for corticofugal modulation of peripheral auditory activity in humans. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 941-948. (Pubitemid 43992444)
21. Winer JA, Diehl JJ, Larue DT,. Projections of auditory cortex to the medial geniculate body of the cat. J Comp Neurol 2001; 430: 27-55.
22. von Kriegstein K, Patterson RD, Griffiths TD,. Task-dependent modulation of medial geniculate body is behaviorally relevant for speech recognition. Curr Biol 2008; 18: 1855-1859.
23. Coomes DL, Schofield BR,. Projections from the auditory cortex to the superior olivary complex in guinea pigs. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19: 2188-2200. (Pubitemid 38582207)
24. Thompson AM, Thompson GC,. Relationship of descending inferior colliculus projections to olivocochlear neurons. J Comp Neurol 1993; 335: 402-412. (Pubitemid 23260378)
25. Guinan JJ Jr,. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 2006; 27: 589-607. (Pubitemid 44691223)
26. Warren EH III, Liberman MC,. Effects of contralateral sound on auditory-nerve responses. I. Contributions of cochlear efferents. Hear Res 1989; 37: 89-104. (Pubitemid 19031165)
27. McFadden D, Mishra R,. On the relation between hearing sensitivity and otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1993; 71: 208-213. (Pubitemid 24029867)
28. Khalfa S, Morlet T, Micheyl C, Morgon A, Collet L,. Evidence of peripheral hearing asymmetry in humans: clinical implications. Acta Otolaryngol 1997; 117: 192-196. (Pubitemid 27151754)
29. Shera CA,. Mechanisms of mammalian otoacoustic emission and their implications for the clinical utility of otoacoustic emissions. Ear Hear 2004; 25: 86-97. (Pubitemid 38451758)
30. Micheyl C, Perrot X, Collet L,. Relationship between auditory intensity discrimination in noise and olivocochlear efferent system activity in humans. Behav Neurosci 1997; 111: 801-807. (Pubitemid 27335391)
31. Giraud AL, Garnier S, Micheyl C, Lina G, Chays A, Chery-Croze S,. Auditory efferents involved in speech-in-noise intelligibility. Neuroreport 1997; 8: 1779-1783. (Pubitemid 27261371)
32. Hickok G, Poeppel D,. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007; 8: 393-402. (Pubitemid 46652465)
33. Blumstein SE, Cooper WE, Zurif EG, Caramazza A,. The perception and production of voice-onset time in aphasia. Neuropsychologia 1977; 15: 371-383. (Pubitemid 8076259)
34. Van Lancker DR, Cummings JL, Kreiman J, Dobkin BH,. Phonagnosia: a dissociation between familiar and unfamiliar voices. Cortex 1988; 24: 195-209.
35. Yamadori A, Osumi Y, Masuhara S, Okubo M,. Preservation of singing in Broca's aphasia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1977; 40: 221-224. (Pubitemid 8095021)
36. Broadbent DE,. The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span. J Exp Psychol 1954; 47: 191-196.
37. Kimura D,. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967; 3: 163-168.
38. Della Penna S, Brancucci A, Babiloni C, et al. Lateralization of dichotic speech stimuli is based on specific auditory pathway interactions: neuromagnetic evidence. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 2303-2311. (Pubitemid 47517466)
39. Westerhausen R, Hugdahl K,. The corpus callosum in dichotic listening studies of hemispheric asymmetry: a review of clinical and experimental evidence. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008; 32: 1044-1054.
40. Stefanatos GA, Joe WQ, Aguirre GK, Detre JA, Wetmore G,. Activation of human auditory cortex during speech perception: effects of monaural, binaural, and dichotic presentation. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 301-315.
41. Sugishita M, Otomo K, Yamazaki K, Shimizu H, Yoshioka M, Shinohara A,. Dichotic listening in patients with partial section of the corpus callosum. Brain 1995; 118 (pt 2): 417-427.
42. Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E,. Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Res 1992; 598: 143-153. (Pubitemid 23013055)
43. Josse G, Seghier ML, Kherif F, Price CJ,. Explaining function with anatomy: language lateralization and corpus callosum size. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 14132-14139.
44. Bamiou DE, Sisodiya S, Musiek FE, Luxon LM,. The role of the interhemispheric pathway in hearing. Brain Res Rev 2007; 56: 170-182. (Pubitemid 350100867)
45. Springer SP, Gazzaniga MS,. Dichotic testing of partial and complete split brain subjects. Neuropsychologia 1975; 13: 341-346.
46. Hugdahl K, Bronnick K, Kyllingsbaek S, Law I, Gade A, Paulson OB,. Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: a 15O-PET study. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37: 431-440. (Pubitemid 29138926)
47. Eichele T, Nordby H, Rimol LM, Hugdahl K,. Asymmetry of evoked potential latency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005; 24: 405-412. (Pubitemid 41133278)
48. Westerhausen R, Moosmann M, Alho K, Medvedev S, Hamalainen H, Hugdahl K,. Top-down and bottom-up interaction: manipulating the dichotic listening ear advantage. Brain Res 2009; 1250: 183-189.
49. Aboitiz F, Scheibel AB, Fisher RS, Zaidel E,. Individual differences in brain asymmetries and fiber composition in the human corpus callosum. Brain Res 1992; 598: 154-161. (Pubitemid 23013056)
50. Boemio A, Fromm S, Braun A, Poeppel D,. Hierarchical and asymmetric temporal sensitivity in human auditory cortices. Nat Neurosci 2005; 8: 389-395. (Pubitemid 40300197)
51. Nicholls ME, Schier M, Stough CK, Box A,. Psychophysical and electrophysiologic support for a left hemisphere temporal processing advantage. Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol 1999; 12: 11-16. (Pubitemid 30326357)
52. Zatorre RJ, Gandour JT,. Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363: 1087-1104. (Pubitemid 351158932)
53. Poeppel D, Idsardi WJ, van Wassenhove V,. Speech perception at the interface of neurobiology and linguistics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2008; 363: 107-1086.
54. Abrams DA, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N,. Right-hemisphere auditory cortex is dominant for coding syllable patterns in speech. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 3958-3965.
55. Formisano E, De Martino F, Bonte M, Goebel R,. "Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech. Science 2008; 322: 970-973.
56. Rosen S,. Temporal information in speech: acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1992; 336: 367-373.
57. Tallal P, Miller S, Fitch RH,. Neurobiological basis of speech: a case for the preeminence of temporal processing. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1993; 682: 27-47. (Pubitemid 23216994)
58. Giraud AL, Kleinschmidt A, Poeppel D, Lund TE, Frackowiak RS, Laufs H,. Endogenous cortical rhythms determine cerebral specialization for speech perception and production. Neuron 2007; 56: 1127-1134. (Pubitemid 350251110)
59. MacNeilage PF, Davis BL,. Motor mechanisms in speech ontogeny: phylogenetic, neurobiological and linguistic implications. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2001; 11: 696-700. (Pubitemid 34014918)
60. Nicholls ME, Searle DA, Bradshaw JL,. Read my lips: asymmetries in the visual expression and perception of speech revealed through the McGurk effect. Psychol Sci 2004; 15: 138-141. (Pubitemid 38361307)
61. Schofield TM, Iverson P, Kiebel SJ, et al. Changing meaning causes coupling changes within higher levels of the cortical hierarchy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106: 11765-11770.
62. Hugdahl K, Heiervang E, Nordby H, et al. Central auditory processing, MRI morphometry and brain laterality: applications to dyslexia. Scand Audiol Suppl 1998; 49: 26-34. (Pubitemid 29137385)
63. Jancke L, Hanggi J, Steinmetz H,. Morphological brain differences between adult stutterers and non-stutterers. BMC Neurol 2004; 4: 23.
64. Gootjes L, Van Strien JW, Bouma A,. Age effects in identifying and localising dichotic stimuli: a corpus callosum deficit? J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004; 26: 826-837. (Pubitemid 39362663)
65. Tadros SF, Frisina ST, Mapes F, Kim S, Frisina DR, Frisina RD,. Loss of peripheral right-ear advantage in age-related hearing loss. Audiol Neurootol 2005; 10: 44-52. (Pubitemid 40069614)
66. Martin JS, Jerger JF,. Some effects of aging on central auditory processing. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 25-44. (Pubitemid 43276899)
67. Salthouse TA,. Aging and measures of processing speed. Biol Psychol 2000; 54: 35-54.
68. Bellis TJ, Nicol T, Kraus N,. Aging affects hemispheric asymmetry in the neural representation of speech sounds. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 791-797. (Pubitemid 30225581)