Natural genetic variation in social environment choice: Context-dependent gene-environment correlation in Drosophila melanogaster

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 2325-2334

  Saltz, Julia B ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Behavior; Development; Genetic variation; Heritability; Sociality

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; FLY; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; GROUP SIZE; HERITABILITY; HETEROZYGOSITY; NATURAL SELECTION; PSYCHOLOGY;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; ENVIRONMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION, GENETIC;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 79960840283     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01295.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie, III, and M. J. Wade. 2001. On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 158:308-323.
2. Bartelt, R. J., A. J. Schaner, and L. L. Jackson. 1985. cis-Vaccenyl acetate as an aggregation pheromone in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1747-1756.
3. Beaver, K. M., J. P. Wright, and M. DeLisi. 2008 Delinquent peer group formation: evidence of a gene x environment correlation. J. Genet. Psychol. 169:227-244.
4. Bijma, P., W. M. Muir, and J. A. Van Arendonk. 2007. Multilevel selection I: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175:277-288.
5. Bleakley, B. H., D. J. Parker, and E. D. Brodie, III. 2007 Non-additive effects of group membership can lead to additive group phenotypes for anti-predator behaviour of guppies, Poecilia reticulata. J. Evol. Biol. 20:1375-1384.
6. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan. 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 162:815-820.
7. Bolker, B. M., M. E. Brooks, C. J. Clark, S. W. Geange, J. R. Poulsen, M. H. H. Stevens, and J.-S. White. 2009. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:127-135.
8. Brakefield, P. M., 2003. Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes. Ecology 84:1661-1671.
9. Bretman, A., C. Fricke, and T. Chapman. 2009. Plastic responses of male Drosophila melanogaster to the level of sperm competition increase male reproductive fitness. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 276:1705-1711.
10. Brown, C. R., and M. B. Brown. 1987. Group-living in cliff swallows as an advantage in avoiding predators. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 21:97-107.
11. Brown, C. R., and M. B. Brown. 2000. Heritable basis for choice of group size in a colonial bird. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:14825-14830.
12. Brown, C. R., N. Komar, S. B. Quick, R. A. Sethi, N. A. Panella, M. B. Brown, and M. Pfeffer. 2001. Arbovirus infection increases with group size. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1833-1840.
13. Clendenen, V. I., C. P. Herman, and J. Polivy. 1994 Social facilitation of eating among friends and strangers. Appetite 23:1-13.
14. Cobb, M., and J.-M. Jallon. 1990. Pheromones, mate recognition and courtship stimulation in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup. Anim. Behav. 39:1058-1067.
15. Cote, J., and J. Clobert. 2007. Social personalities influence natal dispersal in a lizard. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 274:383-390.
16. Dall, S. R. X., A. I. Houston, and J. M. McNamara. The behavioural ecology of personality: consistent individual differences from an adaptive perspective. Ecol. Lett. 7:374-379.
17. Davis, J. M., 2007. Preference or desperation? Natal experience and variation in breeding site selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 74:111-119.
18. Davis, J. M. 2008. Patterns of variation in the influence of natal experience on habitat choice. Q. Rev. Biol. 83:363-382.
19. Day, R. L., MacDonald, T., Brown, C., Laland, K. N. and Reader, S. M. 2001 Interactions between shoal size and conformity in guppy social foraging. Anim. Behav. 62:917-925.
20. Dehaene, S. 2003 The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line. Trends Cogn. Sci. 7:145-147.
21. Dickens, W. T., and J. R. Flynn. 2001 Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: the IQ paradox resolved. Psychol. Rev. 108:346-369.
22. Dugatkin, L. A., and J. G. J. Godin. 1992. Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 249:179-184.
23. Dukas, R. 2004. Evolutionary biology of animal cognition. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 35:347-374.
24. Ferveur, J.-F., 2005. Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 35:279-295.
25. Fowler, J. H., C. T. Dawes, and N. A. Christakis. 2009 Model of genetic variation in human social networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 106:1720-7124.
26. Gillespie, J. H., 2004. Population genetics: a concise guide. The Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore.
27. Gripenberg, S., P. J. Mayhew, M. Parnell, and T. Roslin. 2010. A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol. Lett. 13:383-393.
28. Harshman, L. G., A. A. Hoffmann, and T. Prout. 1988. Environmental effects on remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42:312-321.
29. Harris, W. E., A. J. McKane, and J. B. Wolf. 2008. The maintenance of heritable variation through social competition. Evolution 62:337-347.
30. Heisenberg, M., M. Heusipp, and C. Wanke. 1995. Structural plasticity in the Drosophila brain. J. Neurosci. 15:1951-1960.
31. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
32. Hoffmann, A. A. 1988. Heritable variation for territorial success in two Drosophila melanogaster populations. Anim. Behav. 36:1180-1189.
33. Hoffmann, A. A., and Z. Cacoyianni. 1990. Territoriality in Drosophila melanogaster as a conditional strategy. Anim. Behav. 40:526-537.
34. Jaffee, S. R., and T. S. Price. 2007. Gene-environment correlations: a review of the evidence and implications for the prevention of mental illness. Mol. Psychiatry 12:432-442.
35. Jones, K. A., D. P. Croft, I. W. Ramnarine, and J. G. J. Godin. 2010. Size-assortative shoaling in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata): the role of active choice. Ethology 116:147-154.
36. Kent, C., R. Azanchi, B. Smith, A. Formosa, and J. D. Levine. 2008. Social context influences chemical communication in D. melanogaster males. Curr. Biol. 18:1384-1389.
37. Krupp, J. J., C. Kent, J. C. Billeter, R. Azanchi, A. K. C. So, J. A. Schonfeld, B. P. Smith, C. Lucas, and J. D. Levine. 2008. Social experience modifies pheromone expression and mating behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. Curr. Biol. 18:1373-1383.
38. Larsen, K., J. H. Peterson, E. Budtz-Jørgensen, and R. Endahl. 2000. Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects. Biometrics 56:909-914.
39. Levins, R. 1963 Theory of fitness in heterogeneous environment. II. Developmental flexibility and niche selection. Am. Nat. 97:75-90.
40. Littel, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. G. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Publishing, Cary, NC.
41. McGlothlin, J. W., A. J. Moore, J. B. Wolf, and E. D. Brodie, III. 2010. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64:2558-2574.
42. Merlo, J., B. Chaix, H. Ohlsson, A. Beckman, K. Johnell, P. Hjerpe, L. Råstam, and K. Larsen. 2006. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 60:290-297.
43. Moore, A. J., E. D. Brodie, III, and J. B. Wolf. 1997. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process.1. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51:1352.
44. Nonacs, P., and K. M. Kapheim. 2007. Social heterosis and the maintenance of genetic diversity. J. Evol. Biol. 20:2253-2265.
45. Pepper, J. W., and B. B. Smuts. 2002 A mechanism for the evolution of altruism among nonkin: positive assortment through environmental feedback. Am. Nat. 160:205-213.
46. Plomin, R., J. C. DeFries, and J. C. Loehlin. 1977 Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human behavior. Psychol. Bull. 84:309-322.
47. Powell, J. R. 1997 Progress and prospects in evolutionary biology: The drosophila model. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
48. Rutter, M., and J. Silberg. 2002. Gene-environment interplay in relation to emotional and behavioral disturbance. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 53:463-490.
49. Rutter, M., T. E. Moffitt, and A. Caspi. 2006. Gene-environment interplay and psychopathology: multiple varieties but real effects. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 47:226-261.
50. Saltz, J. B., and B. R. Foley. 2011. Natural genetic variation in social niche construction: social effects of aggression drive disruptive sexual selection in Drosophila melanogaster. The American Naturalist. In press.
51. SAS software version 9.2, 2009, SAS Institute, Cary NC.
52. Scarr, S., and K. McCartney. 1983. How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype → environment effects. Child Devel. 54:424-435.
53. Self, S. G., and K.-Y. Liang. 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82:605-610.
54. Shepard, R. N., D. W. Kilpatric, and J. P. Cunningham. 1975. The internal representation of numbers. Cogn. Psychol. 7:82-138.
55. Sih, A., and B. Christensen. 2001 Optimal diet theory: when does it work, and why does it fail? Anim. Behav. 61:379-390.
56. Smith, J. M. 1964 Group selection and kin selection. Nature 201:1145-1147.
57. Stamps, J., M. Buechner, K. Alexander, J. Davis and N. Zuniga. 2005b. Genotypic differences in space use and movement patterns in Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 70:609-618.
58. Stamps, J. A., and T. G. G. Groothuis. 2010a. The development of animal personality: relevance, concepts and perspectives. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 85:301-325.
59. Stamps, J. A., and T. G. G. Groothuis. 2010b. Developmental perspectives on personality: implications for ecological and evolutionary studies of individual differences. Phil. Trans. B 365:4029-4041.
60. Stamps, J., R. McElreath, and P. Eason. 2005a. Alternative models of conspecific attraction in flies and crabs. Behav. Ecol. 16:974-980.
61. Via, S., 1999. Reproductive isolation between sympatric host races of pea aphids. I. Gene flow restriction and habitat choice. Evolution 53:1446-1457.
62. Wahlsten, D., 2001. Standardizing tests of mouse behavior: reasons, recommendations, and reality. Physiol. Behav. 73:695-704.
63. Wang, L., H. Dankert, P. Perona, and D. J. Anderson. 2008. A common genetic target for environmental and influences on aggressiveness in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105:5657-5663.
64. Wertheim, B., M. Dicke, and L. E. M. Vet. 2002. Behavioural plasticity in support of a benefit for aggregation pheromone use in Drosophila melanogaster. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 103:61-71.
65. Wertheim, B., R. Allemand, L. Vet, and M. Dicke. 2006. Effects of aggregation pheromone on individual and food web interactions: a field study on Drosophila. Ecol. Entomol. 31:216-226.
66. West-Eberhard, M. J. 1983 Sexual selection, social competition and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 58:155-183.
67. Wilson, D. S. 1975 A theory of group selection. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:143-146.
68. Wilson, D. S., and L. A. Dugatkin. 1997 Group selection and assortative interactions. Am. Nat. 149:336-351.
69. Wilson, D. S., and E. O. Wilson. 2007 Rethinking the theoretical foundation of sociobiology. Q. Rev. Biol. 82:327-348.
70. Wolf, J. B., 2003. Genetic architecture and evolutionary constraint when the environment contains genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:4655-4660.
71. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie, III, J. M. Cheverud, A. J. Moore, and M. J. Wade. 1998. Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:64-69.
72. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie, III, and A. J. Moore. 1999. Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. II. Selection resulting from social interactions. Am. Nat. 153:254-266.