The role of different reproductive barriers during phenotypic divergence of isopod ecotypes

Evolution

Volumn 65, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 2631-2640

  Eroukhmanoff, Fabrice ^a,b   Hargeby, Anders ^c   Svensson, Erik I ^a  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive divergence; Assortative mating; Contemporary evolution; Ecological speciation; Migration modification

Indexed keywords

ASSORTATIVE MATING; ECOTYPE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; ISOPOD; LAKE ECOSYSTEM; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTYPE; EUTROPHICATION; FEMALE; GENE FLOW; GENETICS; ISOPODA; LAKE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION MIGRATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; SWEDEN;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; ECOTYPE; EUTROPHICATION; FEMALE; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SPECIATION; ISOPODA; LAKES; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SWEDEN;

SWEDEN;

ASELLUS AQUATICUS;

EID: 80051672629     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01327.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bolnick, D. I., and P. Nosil. 2007. Natural selection in populations subject to a migration load. Evolution 61:2229-2243.
2. Bolnick, D. I., L. K. Snowberg, C. Patenia, W. E. Stutz, T. Ingram, and O. Lee Lau. 2009. Phenotype-dependent native habitat preference facilitates divergence between parapatric lake and stream stickleback. Evolution 63:2004-2016.
3. Boughman, J. W., H. D. Rundle, and D. Schluter. 2005. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution 59:361-373.
4. Carvajal-Rodríguez, A., and E. Rolán-Alvarez. 2006. JMATING: a software for the analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data. BMC Evol. Biol. 6:40-44.
5. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Ecological speciation. Pp. 179-210 in Speciation Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
7. Edelaar, P., A. M. Siepielski, and J. Clobert. 2008. Matching habitat choice causes directed gene flow: a neglected dimension in evolution and ecology. Evolution 62:2462-2472.
8. Eroukhmanoff, F. and E. I. Svensson. 2009. Contemporary parallel diversification, antipredator adaptations and phenotypic integration in an aquatic isopod. PLoS ONE 4:e6173. doi:.
9. Eroukhmanoff, F., A. Hargeby, N. Nowshiravani-Arnberg, O. Hellgren, S. Bensch, and E. I. Svensson. 2009a. Parallelism and historical contingency during rapid ecotype divergence in an aquatic isopod. J. Evol. Biol. 22:1098-1110.
10. ST analysis. Mol. Ecol. 18:4912-4923.
11. Gavrilets, S., H. Li, and M. D. Vose. 2000. Patterns of parapatric speciation. Evolution 54:1126-1134.
12. Gavrilets, S., A. Vose, M. Barluenga, M. W. Salzburger, and A. Meyer. 2007. Case studies and mathematical models of ecological speciation. 1. Cichlids in a crater lake. Mol. Ecol. 16:2893-2909.
13. Hargeby, A., J. Johansson, and J. Ahnesjo. 2004. Habitat-specific pigmentation in a freshwater isopod: adaptive evolution over a small spatio-temporal scale. Evolution 58:81-94.
14. Hargeby, A., J. Stoltz, J. and Johansson. 2005. Locally differentiated cryptic pigmentation in the freshwater isopod Asellus aquaticus. J. Evol. Biol. 18:713-721.
15. Hargeby, A., I. Blindow, and G. Andersson. 2007. Long-term pattern of alternative stable states in two shallow eutrophic lakes. Ecosystems 10:28-35.
16. Hendry, A. P., J. K. Wenburg, P. Bentzen, E. C. Volk, and T. P. Quinn. 2000. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290:516-518.
17. Hendry, A. P., T. Day, and E. B. Taylor. 2001. Population mixing and the adaptive divergence of quantitative traits in discrete populations: a theoretical framework for empirical tests. Evolution 55:459-466.
18. Hendry, A. P., P. Nosil, and L. H. Rieseberg. 2007. The speed of ecological speciation. Funct. Ecol. 21:455-464.
19. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 72:283-327.
20. Karlsson, K., F. Eroukhmanoff, and E. I. Svensson. 2010. Phenotypic plasticity in response to the social environment: effects of density and sex-ratio on mating behaviour following ecotype divergence. PLoS ONE 5:e12755. doi:.
21. Langerhans, R. B. and T. J. DeWitt. 2004. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification. Am. Nat. 164:335-349.
22. Langerhans, R. B., J. H. Knouft, and J. B. Losos. 2006. Shared and unique features of diversification in greater Antillean Anolis ecomorphs. Evolution 60:362-369.
23. Nosil, P., and B. J. Crespi. 2006a. Experimental evidence that predation promotes divergence in adaptive radiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103:9090-9095.
24. Nosil, P., and B. J. Crespi. 2006b. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 273:991-997.
25. Nosil, P., and R. Yukilevich. 2008. Mechanisms of reinforcement in simulated and natural polymorphic populations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 95:305-319.
26. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2002. Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417:440-443.
27. Nosil, P., T. H. Vines, and D. J. Funk. 2005. Perspective: reproductive isolation caused by natural selection against immigrants from divergent habitats. Evolution 59:705-719.
28. Ramsey, J., H. Bradshaw, and D. W. Schemske. 2003. Components of reproductive isolation between the monkeyflowers Mimulus lewisii and M. cardinalis (Phrymaceae). Evolution 57:1520-1534.
29. Rask, M., and C. Hiisivuori. 1985. The predation on Asellus aquaticus (L.) by perch, Perca fluviatilis (L.), in a small forest lake. Hydrobiologia 121:27-34.
30. Rundell, R. J., and T. D. Price. 2009. Adaptive radiation, nonadaptive radiation, ecological speciation and nonecological speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 24:394-399.
31. Rundle, H. D., L. Nagel, J. W. Boughman, and D. Schluter. 2000. Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287:306-308.
32. Rundle, H. D., S. M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 2003. Experimental test of predation's effect on divergent selection during character displacement in sticklebacks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100:14943-14948.
33. Schluter, D. 2000. The ecology of adaptive radiation Oxford Univ. Press Inc., New York, Pp. 1-288.
34. Smock, L. A., and K. L. Harlowe. 1983. Utilization and processing of freshwater wetland macrophytes by the detritivore Asellus forbesi. Ecology 64:1556-1565.
35. Wagner, B. M., and L. A. Hansson. 1998. Food competition and niche separation between fish and the Red-necked Grebe Podiceps grisegena (Boddaert, 1783). Hydrobiologia 368:75-81.
36. Wellborn, G. A., D. K. Skelly, and E. E. Werner. 1996. Mechanisms creating community structure across a freshwater habitat gradient. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:337-363.
37. Yukilevich, R. and J. R. True. 2006. Divergent outcomes of reinforcement speciation: the relative importance of assortative mating and migration modification, Am. Nat. 167:638-654.