Fine-scale differentiation between sockeye salmon ecotypes and the effect of phenotype on straying

Heredity

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 341-350

  Lin, J ^a   Quinn, T P ^a   Hilborn, R ^a   Hauser, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Dispersal; Divergence; Ecotypes; Local adaptation; Oncorhynchus nerka; Population structure

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; MORPHOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS; SALMONID;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; GENE FLOW; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION MIGRATION; REPRODUCTION; SALMON; UNITED STATES;

ALASKA; ANIMAL MIGRATION; ANIMALS; GENE FLOW; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; PHENOTYPE; REPRODUCTION; SALMON; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS);

ALASKA; LITTLE TOGIAK LAKE; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS NERKA;

EID: 52549091773     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2008.59     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Beacham TD, Margolis L, Nelson RJ (1998). A comparison of methods for stock identification for sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia. North Pacific Anadromous Fish Commission Bulletin 1: 227-239.
2. Beacham TD, McIntosh B, MacConnachie C, Miller KM, Withler RE (2006). Pacific Rim population structure of sockeye salmon as determined from microsatellite analysis. Trans Am Fish Soc 135: 174-187.
3. Blair GR, Rogers DE, Quinn TP (1993). Variation in life history characteristics and morphology of sockeye salmon in the Kvichak River System, Bristol Bay, Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 122: 550-559.
4. Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974). Small sample behavior of some statistics which test equality of several means. Technometrics 16: 129-132.
5. Burgner RL (1991). Life history of sockeye salmon. In: Groot C, Margolis L (eds). Pacific Salmon Life Histories. University of British Columbia Press: Vancouver. pp 1-117.
6. Corander J, Waldmann P, Marttinen P, Sillanpaa MJ (2004). BAPS 2: enhanced possibilities for the analysis of genetic population structure. Bioinformatics 20: 2363-2369.
7. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S (2005). Arlequin ver. 3.0: An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online.
8. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK (2003). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics 164: 1567-1587.
9. Goudet J (1995). FSTATv1.2. A computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86: 485-486.
10. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992). Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48: 361-372.
11. Habicht C, Olsen JB, Fair L, Seeb JE (2004). Smaller effective population sizes evidenced by loss of microsatellite alleles in tributary-spawning populations of sockeye salmon from the Kvichak River, Alaska drainage. Environ Biol Fishes 69: 51-62.
12. Hanski I (1998). Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396: 41-49.
13. Hard JJ, Heard WR (1999). Analysis of straying variation in Alaskan hatchery chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) following transplantation. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 56: 578-589.
14. Harrison RG (1980). Dispersal polymorphisms in insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11: 95-118.
15. Hauser L, Adcock GJ, Smith PJ, Ramirez JHB, Carvalho GR (2002). Loss of microsatellite diversity and low effective population size in an overexploited population of New Zealand snapper (Pagrus auratus). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 11742-11747.
16. Hauser L, Seamons TR, Dauer M, Naish KA, Quinn TP (2006). An empirical verification of population assignment methods by marking and parentage data: hatchery and wild steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Forks Creek, Washington, USA. Mol Ecol 15: 3157-3173.
17. Hedrick PW, Rashbrook VK, Hedgecock D (2000). Effective population size of winter-run chinook salmon based on microsatellite analysis of returning spawners. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57: 2368-2373.
18. Hendry AP (2001). Adaptive divergence and the evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: an empirical demonstration using introduced sockeye salmon. Genetica 112: 515-534.
19. Hendry AP (2004). Selection against migrants contributes to the rapid evolution of ecologically dependent reproductive isolation. Evol Ecol Res 6: 1219-1236.
20. Hendry AP, Castric V, Kinnison MT, Quinn TP (2004). The evolution of philopatry and dispersal: homing versus straying in salmonids. In: Hendry AP, Stearns SC (eds). Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and Their Relatives. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 52-91.
21. Hendry AP, Wenburg JK, Bentzen P, Volk EC, Quinn TP (2000). Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science 290: 516-518.
22. Ihssen PE, Evans DO, Christie WJ, Reckahn JA, DesJardine RL (1981). Life history, morphology, and electrophoretic characteristics of five allopatric stocks of lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis) in the Great Lakes region. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38: 1790-1807.
23. Jorde PE, Ryman N (1995). Temporal allele frequency change and estimation of effective size in populations with overlapping generations. Genetics 139: 1077-1090.
24. Kinnison MT, Unwin MJ, Quinn TP (2003). Migratory costs and contemporary evolution of reproductive allocation in male chinook salmon. J Evol Biol 16: 1257-1269.
25. Kruskal WH, Wallis WA (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 47: 583-621.
26. Labelle M (1992). Straying patterns of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) stocks from Southeast Vancouver Island, British-Columbia. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49: 1843-1855.
27. Moore JS, Hendry AP (2005). Both selection and gene flow are necessary to explain adaptive divergence: evidence from clinal variation in stream stickleback. Evol Ecol Res 7: 871-886.
28. Murren CJ, Julliard R, Schlichting CD, Clobert J (2001). Dispersal, individual phenotype, and phenotypic plasticity. In: Clobert J, Danchin E, Dhondt AA and Nichols JD (eds). Dispersal. Oxford University Press: Oxford. pp 261-272.
29. Nelson RJ, Beacham TD (1999). Isolation and cross species amplification of microsatellite loci useful for study of Pacific salmon. Anim Genet 30: 228-229.
30. Olsen JB, Habicht C, Reynolds J, Seeb JE (2004). Moderately and highly polymorphic microsatellites provide discordant estimates of population divergence in sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Environ Biol Fishes 69: 261-273.
31. Olsen JB, Wenburg JK, Bentzen P (1996). Semiautomated multilocus genotyping of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) using microsatellites. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 5: 259-272.
32. Olsen JB, Wilson SL, Kretschmer EJ, Jones KC, Seeb JE (2000). Characterization of 14 tetranucleotide microsatellite loci derived from sockeye salmon. Mol Ecol 9: 2185-2187.
33. Paetkau D, Slade R, Burden M, Estoup A (2004). Genetic assignment methods for the direct, real-time estimation of migration rate: a simulation-based exploration of accuracy and power. Mol Ecol 13: 55-65.
34. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006). GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288-295.
35. Piry S, Alapetite A, Cornuet JM, Paetkau D, Baudouin L, Estoup A (2004). GENECLASS2: a software for genetic assignment and first-generation migrant detection. J Hered 95: 536-539.
36. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945-959.
37. Quinn TP (1999). Revisiting the stock concept in Pacific salmon: insights from Alaska and New Zealand. Northwest Sci 73: 312-324.
38. Quinn TP, Foote CJ (1994). The effects of body size and sexual dimorphism on the reproductive behavior of sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim Behav 48: 751-761.
39. Quinn TP, Fresh K (1984). Homing and straying in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) from Cowlitz River Hatchery, Washington. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 41: 1078-1082.
40. Quinn TP, Hendry AP, Buck GB (2001a). Balancing natural and sexual selection in sockeye salmon: interactions between body size, reproductive opportunity and vulnerability to predation by bears. Evol Ecol Res 3: 917-937.
41. Quinn TP, Nemeth RS, McIsaac DO (1991). Homing and straying patterns of fall Chinook salmon in the lower Columbia River. Trans Am Fish Soc 120: 150-156.
42. Quinn TP, Stewart IJ, Boatright CP (2006). Experimental evidence of homing to site of incubation by mature sockeye salmon, Oncorhynchus nerka. Anim Behav 72: 941-949.
43. Quinn TP, Volk EC, Hendry AP (1999). Natural otolith microstructure patterns reveal precise homing to natal incubation sites by sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Can J Zool 77: 766-775.
44. Quinn TP, Wetzel L, Bishop S, Overberg K, Rogers DE (2001b). Influence of breeding habitat on bear predation and age at maturity and sexual dimorphism of sockeye salmon populations. Can J Zool 79: 1782-1793.
45. Quinn TP, Wood CC, Margolis L, Riddell BE, Hyatt KD (1987). Homing in wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) populations as inferred from differences in parasite prevalence and allozyme allele frequencies. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 44: 1963-1971.
46. Ramstad KM, Foote CJ, Olsen JB (2003). Genetic and phenotypic evidence of reproductive isolation between seasonal runs of sockeye salmon in Bear Lake, Alaska. Trans Am Fish Soc 132: 997-1013.
47. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995). Genepop (Version-1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. J Hered 86: 248-249.
48. Shrimpton JM, Heath DD (2003). Census vs effective population size in chinook salmon: large- and small-scale environmental perturbation effects. Mol Ecol 12: 2571-2583.
49. Skulason S, Smith TB (1995). Resource polymorphisms in vertebrates. Trends Ecol Evol 10: 366-370.
50. Sultan SE, Spencer HG (2002). Metapopulation structure favors plasticity over local adaptation. Am Nat 160: 271-283.
51. Taylor EB, Harvey S, Pollard S, Volpe J (1997). Postglacial genetic differentiation of reproductive ecotypes of kokanee Oncorhynchus nerka in Okanagan Lake, British Columbia. Mol Ecol 6: 503-517.
52. van Oosterhout D, Hutchison WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004). MICROCHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 535-538.
53. Waples RS (2004). Salmonid insight into effective population size. In: Hendry AP, Stearns SC (eds). Evolution Illuminated: Salmon and their Relatives. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK. pp 295-314.
54. Waples RS, Do C (In press). LDNE: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium. Mol Ecol Resour.
55. Weir BS, Cockerham CC (1984). Estimating F-Statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 38: 1358-1370.
56. ST not equal to 1/(4 Nm+1). Heredity 82: 117-125.
57. Williamson KS, Cordes JF, May B (2002). Characterization of microsatellite loci in chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and cross-species amplification in other salmonids. Mol Ecol Notes 2: 17-19.
58. Wood CC (1995). Life history variation and population structure in sockeye salmon. American Fisheries Society Symposium 17: 195-216.
59. Young DB, Woody CA (2007). Dynamic in-lake spawning migrations by female sockeye salmon. Ecol Freshw Fish 16: 155-164.