A twin-hypersphere support vector machine classifier and the fast learning algorithm

Information Sciences

Volumn 221, Issue , 2013, Pages 12-27

  Peng, Xinjun ^a   Xu, Dong ^a  

^a SHANGHAI NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Gilbert's algorithm; Nonparallel hyperplane; Pattern recognition; Support vector machine; Twin hypersphere

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); PATTERN RECOGNITION; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING; VECTORS;

BENCHMARK DATASETS; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; HYPERSPHERE; NON-PARALLEL HYPERPLANES; QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING PROBLEMS; REDUCED CONVEX HULLS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE CLASSIFIERS; TWIN SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

EID: 84868695436     PISSN: 00200255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2012.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. X. Chen, J. Yang, Q. Ye, J. Liang, Recursive projection twin support vector machine via within-class variance minimization, Pattern Recognition 44 (2011) 2643-2655.
2. D.J. Crisp, C.J.C. Burges, A geometric interpretation of m-SVM classifiers, in: S. Solla, T. Leen, K.-R. Muller (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 12, 2000, pp. 244-250.
3. S. Ghorai, A. Mukherjee, P.K. Dutta, Nonparallel plane proximal classifier, Signal Processing 89 (4) (2009) 510-522.
4. E.G. Gilbert, An iterative procedure for computing the minimum of a quadratic form on a convex set, SIAM Journal on Control 4 (1) (1966) 61-79.
5. Q. He, C. Wu, Separating theorem of samples in Banach space for support vector machine learning, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2 (1) (2011) 49-54.
6. C.W. Hsu, C.J. Lin, A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 13 (2002) 415-425.
7. Jayadeva, R. Khemchandani, S. Chandra, Twin support vector machines for pattern classification, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intellegence 29 (5) (2007) 905-910.
8. M.A. Kumar, M. Gopal, Application of smoothing technique on twin support vector machines, Pattern Recognition Letter 29 (13) (2008) 1842-1848.
9. M.A. Kumar, M. Gopal, Least squares twin support vector machines for pattern classification, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (4) (2009) 7535-7543.
10. J. Li, J. Pan, S. Chu, Kernel class-wise locality preserving projection, Information Sciences 178 (7) (2008) 1825-1835.
11. Z. Liu, Q.H. Wu, Y. Zhang, et al, Adaptive least squares support vector machines filter for hand tremor canceling in microsurgery, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2 (1) (2011) 37-47.
12. A.M. Martinez, R. Benavente, The AR face database, CVC Technical Report #24, June 1998.
13. U. Maulik, D. Chakraborty, A novel semisupervised SVM for pixel classification of remote sensing imagery, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0059-3.
14. M.E. Mavroforakis, S. Theodoridis, A geometric approach to support vector machine (SVM) classification, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 17 (3) (2007) 671-682.
15. S.A. Nene, S.K. Nayar, H. Murase, Columbia object image library (COIL-20), Technical Report CUCS-005-96, February 1996.
16. X. Peng, TSVR: an efficient twin support vector machine for regression, Neural Networks 23 (3) (2010) 365-372.
17. X. Peng, Least squares twin support vector hypersphere (LS-TSVH) for pattern recognition, Expert Systems with Applications 37 (12) (2010) 8371-8378.
18. X. Peng, A m-twin support vector machine (m-TSVM) classifier and its geometric approaches, Information Sciences 180 (15) (2010) 3863-3875.
19. X. Peng, Building sparse twin support vector machine classifiers in primal space, Information Sciences 181 (18) (2011) 3967-3980.
20. X. Peng, TPMSVM: a novel twin parametric-margin support vector machine for pattern recognition, Pattern Recognition 44 (10-11) (2011) 2678-2692.
21. X. Peng, Efficient twin parametric insensitive support vector regression model, Neurocomputing 79 (2012) 26-38.
22. X. Peng, D. Xu, Twin Mahalanobis distance-based support vector machines for pattern recognition, Information Sciences 200 (2012) 22-37.
23. B. Schölkopf, J. Platt, J. Shawe-Taylor, A.J. Smola, R.C. Williamson, Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution, Neural Computation 13 (7) (2001) 1443-1471.
24. D. Tax, R. Duin, Support vector domain description, Pattern Recognition Letter 20 (1999) 1191-1199.
25. D. Tax, R. Duin, Support vector data description, Machine Learning 54 (2004) 45-66.
26. V. Vapnik, The Natural of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer, New York, 1995.
27. X. Wang, C. Dong, Improving generalization of fuzzy if-then rules by maximizing fuzzy entropy, IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 17 (3) (2009) 556-567.
28. X. Wang, L. Dong, J. Yan, Maximum ambiguity based sample selection in fuzzy decision tree induction, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2011.67.
29. X. Wang, S. Lu, J. Zhai, Fast fuzzy multi-category SVM based on support vector domain description, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligences 22 (1) (2008) 109-120.
30. X. Wang, J. Zhai, S. Lu, Induction of multiple fuzzy decision trees based on rough set technique, Information Sciences 178 (16) (2008) 3188-3202.
31. J. Xiao, H. Wang, X. Yang, Z. Gao, Multiple faults diagnosis in motion system based on SVM, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13042-011-0035-y.