Erratum to Brief Wait Time to Increase Response Opportunity and Correct Responding of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Display Challenging Behavior (J Dev Phys Disabil, 10.1007/s10882-012-9289-x);Brief Wait Time to Increase Response Opportunity and Correct Responding of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Who Display Challenging Behavior

Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 559-573

  Lamella, Lisa ^a   Tincani, Matt ^a  

^a TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Autism spectrum disorder; Instructional pacing; Response latency; Wait time

Indexed keywords

EID: 84868480637     PISSN: 1056263X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10882-012-9298-9     Document Type: Erratum

References (21)

1. Berrong, A. K., Schuster, J. W., Morse, T. E., & Collins, B. C. (2007). The effects of response cards on active participation and social behavior of students with moderate and severe disabilities. Journal of Developmental & Physical Disabilities, 19, 187-199.
2. Burns, M. K. (2007). Comparison of opportunities to respond within a drill model when rehearsing sight words with a child with mental retardation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 250-263.
3. Carine, D. W. (1976). Effects of two teacher presentation rates on off-task behavior, answering correctly, and participation. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 199-206.
4. Christle, C. A., & Schuster, J. W. (2003). The effects of using response cards on student participation, academic achievement, and on-task behavior during whole-class math instruction. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 147-165.
5. Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
6. Duker, P. C., van Doeselaar, C., & Vestraten, A. (1993). The effect of response delay on correct responding to instructions during communicative gesture training. Education & Training in Mental Retardation, 28, 327-332.
7. Dunlap, G., Dyer, K., & Koegel, R. L. (1983). Autistic self-stimulation and intertrial interval duration. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 88, 194-202.
8. Dyer, K., Christian, W. P., & Luce, S. C. (1982). The role of response delay in improving the discrimination performance of autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 231-240.
9. Gardner, R., Heward, W. L., & Grossi, T. A. (1994). Effects of response cards on student participation and academic achievement: a systematic replication with inner-city students during whole-class science instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 63-71.
10. Gilbertson, D., & Bluck, J. (2006). Improving responsiveness to intervention for English-Language Learners: a comparison of instructional pace on letter naming rates. Journal of Behavioral Education, 15, 131-147.
11. Haydon, T., Mancil, G. R., & van Loan, C. (2009). Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: a case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 267-278.
12. Heward, W. L. (1994). Three "low tech" strategies for increasing the frequency of active child response during group instruction. In R. Gardiner III, D. M. Sainato, J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A. Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on measurable superior instruction (pp. 283-320). Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole.
13. Koegel, R. L., Dunlap, G., & Dyer, K. (1980). Intertrial interval duration and learning in autistic children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 13, 91-99.
14. Partin, M., Robertson, R., Maggin, D., Oliver, R., & Wehby, J. (2010). Using teacher praise and opportunities to respond to promote appropriate student behavior. Preventing School Failure, 54, 172-178.
15. Sutherland, K. S., Alder, N., & Gunter, P. L. (2003). The effect of varying rates of OTR on the classroom behavior of students with EBD. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 239-248.
16. Szadokierski, I., & Burns, M. K. (2008). Analogue evaluation of the effects o opportunities to respond and ratios of known items within drill rehearsal of Esperanto words. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 593-609.
17. Tincani, M., & Crozier, S. (2008). Comparing brief and extended wait time during small group instruction for children with challenging behavior. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 79-92.
18. Tincani, M., Ernsbarger, S., Harrison, T. J., & Heward, W. L. (2005). Effects of two instructional paces on pre-K children's participation rate, accuracy, and off-task behavior in the Language for Learning Program. Journal of Direct Instruction, 5, 97-109.
19. Valcante, G., Roberson, W., Reid, W. R., & Wolking, W. D. (1989). Effects of wait-time and intertrial interval durations on learning by children with multiple handicaps. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 22, 43-55.
20. West, R., & Sloane, H. (1986). Teacher presentation rate and point delivery rate: effect on classroom disruption, performance accuracy, and response rate. Behavior Modification, 10, 267-286.
21. Wood, C., Marby, L., Kretlow, A., Lo, Y., & Galloway, T. (2009). Effects of preprinted response cards on students' participation and off-task behavior in a rural kindergarten classroom. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 28, 39-47.