Analogue evaluation of the effects of opportunities to respond and ratios of known items within drill rehearsal of Esperanto words

Journal of School Psychology

Volumn 46, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 593-609

  Szadokierski, Isadora ^a   Burns, Matthew K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drill ratios; Opportunities to respond

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LINGUISTICS; MALE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; VERBAL LEARNING; VOCABULARY;

EID: 49549106866     PISSN: 00224405     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2008.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Albers A.E., and Greer R.D. Is the three-term contingency trial a predictor of effective instruction?. Journal of Behavioral Education 1 (1991) 337-354
2. Belfiore P.J., Skinner C.H., and Ferkis M.A. Effects of response and trial repetition on sight-word training for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 28 (1995) 347-348
3. Betts E.A. Foundations of reading instruction (1946), American Book, New York
4. Burns M.K. Empirical analysis of drill ratio research: Refining the instructional level for drill tasks. Remedial and Special Education 25 (2004) 167-175
5. Burns M.K. Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly 22 (2007) 297-313
6. Burns M.K. Comparison of drill ratio and opportunities to respond when rehearsing sight words with a child with mental retardation. School Psychology Quarterly 22 (2007) 250-263
7. Burns M.K., and Dean V.J. Effect of drill ratios on recall and on-task behavior for children with learning and attention difficulties. Journal of Instructional Psychology 32 (2005) 118-126
8. Carnine D.W., Silbert J., Kame'enui E.J., and Tarver S.G. Direct instruction reading. 4th ed. (2004), Merrill Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
9. Cates G.L., Skinner C.H., Watson T.S., Meadows T.J., Weaver A., and Jackson B. Instructional effectiveness and instructional efficiency as considerations for data-based decision making: An evaluation of interspersing procedures. School Psychology Review 32 (2003) 601-616
10. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
11. Cooke N.L., Guzaukas R., Pressley J.S., and Kerr K. Effects of using a ratio of new items to review items during drill and practice: Three experiments. Education and Treatment of Children 19 (1993) 124-142
12. Dolch E.W. A basic sight vocabulary. Elementary School Journal 36 (1936) 456-460
13. Fry E.B., and Kress J.E. The reading teacher's book of lists. 5th Ed. (2006), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
14. Gickling E.E., and Armstrong D.L. Levels of instructional difficulty as related to on-task behavior, task completion, and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disability 11 (1978) 559-566
15. Gickling E.E., and Havertape S. Curriculum-Based Assessment (CBA) (1981), School Psychology Inservice Training Network, Minneapolis, MN
16. Gickling E., and Thompson V. A personal view of curriculum-based assessment. Exceptional Children 52 (1985) 205-218
17. Gravois T.A., and Gickling E.E. Best practices in curriculum-based assessment. In: Thomas A., and Grimes J. (Eds). Best practices in school psychology IV (2002), National Association of School Psychologists, Bethesda MD 885-898
18. Greenwood C.R., Delquadri J., and Hall R.V. Opportunity to respond and student academic performance. In: Heward W., Heron T., Hill D., and Trap-Porter J. (Eds). Focus on behavior analysis in education (1984), Charles E. Merrill, Columbus, OH 58-88
19. Hargis C.H., Terhaar-Yonkers M., Williams P.C., and Reed M.T. Repetition requirements for word recognition. Journal of Reading 31 (1988) 320-327
20. Harlow D. The Esperanto book (2000). http://donh.best.vwh.net/Esperanto/eaccess/eaccess.book.html Retrieved May 12, 2006, from http://donh.best.vwh.net/Esperanto/eaccess/eaccess.book.html
21. Joseph L.M., and Nist L.M. Comparing the effects of unknown-known ratios on word reading learning versus learning rates. Journal of Behavioral Education 15 (2006) 69-79
22. LaBerge D., and Samuels S.J. Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology 6 (1974) 293-323
23. MacQuarrie L.L., Tucker J.A., Burns M.K., and Hartman B. Comparison of retention rates using traditional, Drill Sandwich, and Incremental Rehearsal flashcard methods. School Psychology Review 31 (2002) 584-595
24. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754) (2000), U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
25. Neef N.A., Iwata B.A., and Page T.J. The effects of known-item interspersal on acquisition and retention of spelling and sight reading words. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10 (1977) 738
26. Neef N.A., Iwata B.A., and Page T.J. The effects of interspersal training versus high-density reinforcement of spelling acquisition and retention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 13 (1980) 153-158
27. Roberts M.L., and Shapiro E.S. Effects of instructional ratios on students' reading performance in a regular education program. Journal of School Psychology 34 (1996) 73-91
28. Roberts M.L., Turco T.L., and Shapiro E.S. Differential effects of fixed instructional ratios on students' progress in reading. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment 9 (1991) 308-318
29. Shapiro E.S. Use of Gickling's model of curriculum-based assessment to improve reading in elementary age students. School Psychology Review 21 (1992) 168-176
30. Shapiro E.S. Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. 3rd ed. (2004), Guilford Press, New York
31. Skinner C.H., Turco T.L., Beatty K.L., and Rasavage C. Cover, copy, and compare: A method for increasing multiplication performance. School Psychology Review 18 (1989) 412-420
32. Treptow M.A., Burns M.K., and McComas J.J. Reading at the frustration, instructional, and independent levels: The effects on student's reading comprehension and time on task. School Psychology Review 36 (2007) 159-166
33. Tucker, J.A. (1989). Basic flashcard technique when vocabulary is the goal. Unpublished teaching materials, School of Education, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga. Chattanooga, TN.