Using opportunities to respond in a general education classroom: A case study

Education and Treatment of Children

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 267-278

  Haydon, Todd ^a,c   Mancil, G Richmond ^b   Van Loan, Christopher ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68149160288     PISSN: 07488491     EISSN: 19348924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/etc.0.0052     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Armendariz, F., & Umbreit, J. (1999). Using active responding to reduce disruptive behavior in a general education classroom. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 1,152-158.
2. Barbetta, P. M., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of sight words by students with developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 26,111-119.
3. Barbetta, P. M., & Heward, W. L. (1993). Effects of active student response during error correction on the acquisition and maintenance of geography facts by elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 3,217-233.
4. Engelmann, S. & Carnine, D. (1991). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. Eugene, OR: ADI Press.
5. Greenwood, C. R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R. V. (1984). Opportunity to respond and student academic achievement. In W.L. Heward, T. E. Heron, D. S. Hill, & Trap-Porter (Eds.), Focus on behavior analysis in education(pp. 58-88). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6. Heward, W. L., Courson, F. H., & Narayan, J. S. (1989). Using choral responding to increase active student response. Teaching Exceptional Children,21, 72-75.
7. Kazdin, A. E. (1982). Single-case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings.New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Kennedy, C. H., (2005). Single-case designs for educational research.Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon.
9. McKenzie, G. R., & Henry, M. (1979). Effects of testlike events on ontask behavior, test anxiety, and achievement in a classroom rule-learning task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71,370-374.
10. Miller, A. D., Hall, M. A., Heward, W. L. (1995). Effects of sequential 1-minute time trials with and without inter-trial feedback and self-correction on gernal and special education students' fluency with math facts. Journal of Behavioral Education, 5,319-345.
11. Sainato, D. M., Strain, P. S., & Lyon, S. R. (1987). Increasing academic responding of handicapped preschool children during group instruction. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 12,23-30.
12. Salend, S. J. (1998). Effective mainstreaming: Creating inclusive classrooms.NJ: Merrill.
13. Sidman, M. (1960). Tactics of scientific research: Evaluating experimental data in psychology.Boston: Authors Cooperative.
14. Skinner, C. H., Fletcher, P. A., & Henington, C. (1996). Increasing learning rates by increasing student responses rates: A summary of research. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 313-325.
15. Sterling, R. M., Barbetta, P. M., Heward, W. L., & Heron, T. E. (1997). A comparison of active student response and on-task instruction on the acquisition and maintenance of health facts by fourth grade special education students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7,151-165.
16. Walker, H. M., & Severson, H. H., (1993). Systematic screening for behavior disorders.Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
17. West, R. P., & Sloan, H. N. (1986). Teacher presentation rate and point delivery rate: Effects on classroom disruption, performance accuracy, and response rate. Behavior Modification, 10, 267-286.
18. Ysseldyke, J., Burns, M., Dawson, P., Kelley, B., Morrison, D., Ortiz, S., Rosenfield, S., & Telzrow, C. (2006). School psychology: A blueprint for training and practice III.Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.