Quantitative risk assessment for skin sensitisation: Consideration of a simplified approach for hair dye ingredients

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 1970, Pages 459-465

  Goebel, Carsten ^a   Diepgen, Thomas L ^b   Krasteva, Maya ^c   Schlatter, Harald ^a   Nicolas, Jean Francois ^d   Blömeke, Brunhilde ^e   Coenraads, Pieter Jan ^f   Schnuch, Axel ^g   Taylor, James S ^h   Pungier, Jacquemine ^c   Fautz, Rolf ⁱ   Fuchs, Anne ⁱ   Schuh, Werner ^j   Gerberick, G Frank ^a   Kimber, Ian ^k  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c L ORÉAL RECHERCHE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

^f UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^h LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

ⁱ KAO GERMANY GMBH   (Germany)

^j HENKEL KGAA   (Germany)

^k UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Allergic contact dermatitis; Hair dye allergy; Hair dyes; para Phenylenediamine; PPD; QRA; Quantitative risk assessment; Resorcinol; Skin sensitization

Indexed keywords

HAIR DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE; RESORCINOL; 4-PHENYLENEDIAMINE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE DERIVATIVE; RESORCINOL DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DERMIS; EPIDERMIS; EXPOSURE; FEMALE; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN SENSITIZATION; STRATUM CORNEUM; ANIMAL; CBA MOUSE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRODUCT SAFETY; SKIN TEST; SWINE;

ANIMALS; CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY; FEMALE; HAIR DYES; HUMANS; LOCAL LYMPH NODE ASSAY; MICE; MICE, INBRED CBA; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; RESORCINOLS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SKIN TESTS; SWINE;

EID: 84868473355     PISSN: 02732300     EISSN: 10960295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Aeby, P., Sieber, T., Beck, H., Gerberick, G.F., Goebel, C., Skin Sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: The diverging roles of oxidation and N-acetylation for dendritic cell activation and the immune response. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129 (2009), 99–109.
2. Almeida, P.J., Borrego, L., Pulido-Melián, E., González-Díaz, O., Quantification of p-phenylenediamine and 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone in henna tattoos. Contact Dermatitis 66 (2011), 33–37.
3. Api, A.M., Basketter, D.A., Cadby, P.A., Cano, M.-F., Ellis, G., Gerberick, G.F., Griem, P., McNamee, P.M., Ryan, C.A., Safford, R., Dermal sensitization quantitative risk assessment (QRA) for fragrance ingredients. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52 (2008), 3–23.
4. Barbaud, A., Reichert-Pnentrat, S., Trechot, F., Granel, F., Schmutz, J.-L., Sensitization to resorcinol due to an anti-wart ointment: unusual clinical features and occurrence. Ann. Dermatol. Venerol. 128 (2001), 615–618.
5. Basketter, D.A., Skin sensitization: strategies for the assessment and management of risk. Br. J. Deramtol. 159 (2008), 267–273.
6. Basketter, D.A., Angelini, G., Ingber, A., Kern, P.S., Menne, T., Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis 49 (2003), 1–7.
7. Basketter, D.A., Clapp, C., Jefferies, D., Safford, B., Ryan, C.A., Gerberick, G.F., Dearman, R.J., Kimber, I., Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds. Contact Dermatitis 53 (2005), 260–267.
8. Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, F., Kimber, I., The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation. Contact Dermatitis 7 (2007), 70–75.
9. Basketter, D.A., Sanders, D., Jowsey, I.R., The skin sensitization potential of resorcinol: experience with the local lymph node assay. Contact Dermatitis 56 (2007), 196–200.
10. Basketter, D.A., Clapp, C.J., Safford, B.J., Jowsey, I.R., McNamee, P., Ryan, C.A., Gerberick, G.F., Preservatives and skin sensitization quantitative risk assessment. Dermatitis 19 (2008), 20–27.
11. Bonefeld, C.M., Larsen, J.M., Dabelsteen, S., Geisler, C., White, I.R., Menné T., Johansen, J.D., Consumer available permanent hair dye products cause major allergic immune activation in an animal model. Br. J. Dermatol. 162 (2010), 102–107.
12. Brancaccio, R.R., Brown, L.H., Chang, Y.T., Fogelman, J.P., Mafong, E.A., Cohen, D.E., Identification and quantification of para-phenylenediamine in a temporary black henna tattoo. Am. J. Contact Dermat. 13 (2002), 15–18.
13. Brody, F., Bruns, M.S., Studies concerning the reactions of oxidation dye intermediates. J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 19 (1968), 361–379.
14. Corea, N., Basketter, D.A., van Asten, A., Fragrance allergy: assessing the risk from fabric washing products. Contact Dermatitis 55 (2006), 48–53.
15. EU Commission Communication IP/07/439, 29 March 2007.
16. Felter, S.P., Robinson, M.K., Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F., A review of the scientific basis for uncertainty factors for use in quantitative risk assessment for the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 47 (2002), 257–266.
17. Felter, S.P., Ryan, C.A., Basketter, D.A., Gilmour, N.J., Gerberick, G.F., Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 37 (2003), 1–10.
18. Frosch, P.J., Burrows, D., Camarasa, J.G., Allergic reactions to hairdressers’ series: results from 9 European centers. Contact Dermatitis 28 (1993), 180–183.
19. Gerberick, G.F., Robinson, M.K., Felter, S., Understanding fragrance allergy using an exposure-based risk assessment approach. Contact Dermatitis 45 (2001), 333–340.
20. Gerberick, G.F., Robinson, M.K., Ryan, C.A., Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data. Am. J. Contact Dermat. 12 (2001), 156–161.
21. Goebel, C., Coenraads, P.J., Rothe, H., Kunze, G., Kock, M., Schlatter, H., Gerberick, G.F., Blömeke, B., Elicitation of the immune response to p-phenylenediamine in allergic patients: the role of dose and exposure time. Br. J. Dermatol. 163 (2010), 1205–1211.
22. Griem, P., Goebel, C., Scheffler, H., Proposal for a risk assessment methodology for skin sensitization based on sensitization potency data. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 38 (2003), 269–290.
23. Ho, S.G.Y., Basketter, D.A., Rycroft, R.J.G., White, I.R., McFadden, J.P., Analysis of para-phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br. J. Dermatol. 153 (2005), 364–367.
24. Hostynek, J.J., Maibach, H.I., Thresholds of elicitation depend on induction conditions Could low level exposure induce sub-clinical allergic states that are only elicited under the severe conditions of clinical diagnosis?. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004), 1859–1865.
25. Houben, E., De Paepe, K., Rogiers, V.A., Keratinocyte's course of life Skin. Pharmacol. Physiol. 20 (2007), 122–132.
26. Hueber-Becker, F., Nohynek, G.J., Meuling, W.J., Benech-Kieffer, F., Toutain, H., Human systemic exposure to a [14C]-para-phenylenediamine-containing oxidative hair dye and correlation with in vitro percutaneous absorption in human or pig skin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 42 (2004), 1227–1236.
27. Kimber, I., Basketter, D.A., Butler, M., Gamer, A., Garrigue, J.-L., Gerberick, G.F., Newsome, C., Steiling, W., Vohr, H.-W., Classification of contact allergens according to potency: proposals. Food Chem. Toxicol. 41 (2003), 1799–1809.
28. Kligman, A.M., The identification of contact allergens by human assay III The maximization test: a procedure for screening and rating contact sensitizers. J. Invest. Dermatol. 47 (1966), 393–409.
29. Krasteva, M., Bons, B., Ryan, C.A., Gerberick, G.F., Consumer allergy to oxidative hair coloring products: epidemiologic data in the literature. Dermatitis 20 (2009), 123–141.
30. Krasteva, M., Bons, B., Tozer, S., Rich, K., Hoting, E., Hollenberg, D., Fuchs, A., Fautz, R., Contact allergy to hair colouring products: The cosmetovigilance experience of 4 companies (2003–2006). Eur. J. Dermatol. 20 (2010), 1–11.
31. Lashmar, U.T., Hadgraft, J., Thomas, N., Topical application of penetration enhancers to the skin of nude mice: a histopathological study. Pharm. Pharmacol. 41 (1989), 118–121.
32. Marzulli, F.N., Maibach, H.I., The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. Food Chem. Toxicol. 12 (1974), 219–227.
33. McNamee, P.M., Api, A.M., Basketter, D.A., Gerberick, G.F., Gilpin, D.A., Hall, B.M., Jowsey, I., Robinson, M.K., A review of critical factors in the conduct and interpretation of the human repeat insult patch test. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 52 (2008), 24–34.
34. OECD, 2002. Guideline for the testing of chemicals, Test Guideline 429: Skin Sensitization: Local Lymph Node Assay.
35. OECD, 2004a. Environmental Health and Safety Publications Series on Testing and Assessment No. 28. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin Absorption Studies.
36. OECD, 2004b. Guideline for testing of chemicals, Test Guideline 428: Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method.
37. Robinson, M.K., Gerberick, G.F., Ryan, C.A., McNamee, P., White, I.R., Basketter, D.A., The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42 (2000), 251–259.
38. SCCP (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products), 2006a. Memorandum on hair dye substances and their skin sensitising properties. Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_s_05.pdf> (19.12.06).
39. SCCP (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products), 2006b. Opinion on p-phenylenediamine. Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_risk/committees/04_sccp/docs/sccp_o_069.pdf> (10.10.2006).
40. SCCP/SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Products/Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), Link to opinions on individual hair dye ingredients (October 2004 – February 2009). Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/opinions/sccp_opinions_en.htm#2> Link to opinions on individual hair dye ingredients (after February 2009): < http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/opinions/index_en.htm#id2>.
41. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), 2010a. The SCCS'S Notes of Guidance for the testing of cosmetic ingredients and their safety evaluation – 7th revision 14 December 2010. Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_004.pdf> (14.12.10).
42. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), 2010b. Basic criteria for the in vitro assessment of dermal absorption of cosmetic ingredients. Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_s_002.pdf> (22.06.10).
43. SCCS (Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety), 2010c. Opinion on resorcinol. Available at: < http://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/consumer_safety/docs/sccs_o_015.pdf> (23.25.10).
44. Schlatter, H., Long, T., Gray, J., An overview of hair dye safety. J. Cosmetic Dermatol. 6 (2007), 32–36.
45. Schneider, K., Akkan, Z., Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 39 (2004), 245–255.
46. Thyssen, J.P., White, J.M., European society of contact dermatitis. Epidemiological data on consumer allergy to p-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 59 (2008), 327–343.
47. Tsai, J.C., Sheu, H.-M., Hung, P.-L., Cheng, C.-L., Effect of barrier disruption by acetone treatment on the permeability of compounds with various lipophilicities: implications for the permeability of compromised skin. J. Pharm. Sci. 90 (2001), 1242–1254.
48. Wang, M.Z., Farmer, S.A., Richardson, D.M., Davis, M.D., Patch-testing with hairdressing chemicals. Dermatitis 22 (2011), 16–26.
49. Warbrick, E.V., Dearman, R.J., Lea, L.J., Basketter, D.A., Kimber, I., Local lymph node assay responses to paraphenylenediamine: intra- and interlaboratory evaluations. J. Appl. Toxicol. 19 (1999), 255–260.
50. White, J.M., Kullavanijaya, P., Duangdeeden, I., Zazzeroni, R., Gilmour, N.J., Basketter, D.A., McFadden, J.P., p-Phenylenediamine allergy: the role of Bandrowski's base. Clin. Exp. Allergy 36 (2006), 1289–1293.
51. Woodford, R., Barry, B., Penetration enhancers and percutaneous absorption of drugs: an update. J. Toxicol. Cutaneous Occular Toxicol. 5 (1986), 167–177.