Elicitation of the immune response to p-phenylenediamine in allergic patients: The role of dose and exposure time

British Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 163, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1205-1211

  Goebel, C ^a   Coenraads, P J ^b   Rothe, H ^a   Kunze, G ^a   Kock, M ^a   Schlatter, H ^a   Gerberick, G F ^a   Blomeke B ^c  

^a PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

allergic contact dermatitis; exposure dependent elicitation; measured exposure level; p phenylenediamine; permanent hair dyeing

Indexed keywords

HAIR DYE; PHENYLENEDIAMINE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DOSE TIME EFFECT RELATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNE RESPONSE; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; NONHUMAN; PATCH TEST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN ABSORPTION; SKIN ALLERGY;

ADULT; ALLERGENS; DERMATITIS, ALLERGIC CONTACT; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; HAIR DYES; HUMANS; MALE; PATCH TESTS; PHENYLENEDIAMINES; SKIN; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 78649660853     PISSN: 00070963     EISSN: 13652133     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.10009.x     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Andersen KE, Johansen JD, Bruze M, et al. The time-dose-response relationship for elicitation of contact dermatitis in isoeugenol allergic individuals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2001; 170: 166-71.
2. Friedmann PS,. The relationships between exposure dose and response in induction and elicitation of contact hypersensitivity in humans. Br J Dermatol 2007; 157: 1093-102.
3. Schwartz L, Peck SM,. The patch test in contact dermatitis. Public Health Rep 1944; 59: 546-57.
4. Wilkinson DS, Fregert S, Magnusson B, et al. Terminology of contact dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 1970; 50: 287-92.
5. Marzulli FN, Maibach HI,. Contact allergy: predictive testing in man. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 1-17.
6. Sosted H, Menné T, Johansen JD,. Patch test dose-response study of p-phenylenediamine: thresholds and anatomical regional differences. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 54: 145-9.
7. Saripalli YV, Achen F, Belsito DV,. The detection of clinically relevant contact allergens using a standard screening tray of twenty-three allergens. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003; 49: 65-9.
8. Lazarov A, David M, Abraham D, et al. Comparison of reactivity to allergens using the TRUE Test and IQ chamber system. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 140-5.
9. Marzulli FN, Maibach HI,. Effects of vehicles and elicitation concentration in contact dermatitis testing. I. Experimental contact sensitization in humans. Contact Dermatitis 1976; 2: 325-9.
10. Marzulli FN, Maibach HI,. The use of graded concentrations in studying skin sensitizers: experimental contact sensitization in man. Food Cosmet Toxicol 1974; 12: 219-27.
11. McFadden JP, Wakelin SH, Holloway DB, et al. The effect of patch duration on the elicitation of para-phenylenediamine contact allergy. Contact Dermatitis 1998; 39: 79-81.
12. Hextall JM, Alagaratnam NJ, Glendinning AK, et al. Dose-time relationships for elicitation of contact allergy to para-phenylenediamine. Contact Dermatitis 2002; 47: 96-9.
13. Ho SG, Basketter DA, Jefferies D, et al. Analysis of para- phenylenediamine allergic patients in relation to strength of patch test reaction. Br J Dermatol 2005; 153: 364-7.
14. Jowsey IR, Basketter DA, McFadden JP, et al. Elicitation response characteristics to permanent hair dye in paraphenylenediamine-allergic volunteers. Contact Dermatitis 2006; 55: 330-4.
15. White JM, Basketter DA, Pease CK, et al. Intermittent exposure to low-concentration paraphenylenediamine can be equivalent to single, higher-dose exposure. Contact Dermatitis 2007; 56: 262-5.
16. Schnuch A, Lessmann H, Frosch PJ, et al. para-Phenylenediamine: the profile of an important allergen. Results of the IVDK. Br J Dermatol 2008; 159: 379-86.
17. Brody F, Burns MS,. Studies concerning the reactions of oxidation dye intermediates. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1968; 19: 361-79.
18. Hueber-Becker F, Nohynek GJ, Meuling WJ, et al. Human systemic exposure to a [14C]-para-phenylenediamine-containing oxidative hair dye and correlation with in vitro percutaneous absorption in human or pig skin. Food Chem Toxicol 2004; 42: 1227-36.
19. Aeby P, Sieber T, Beck H, et al. Skin sensitization to p-phenylenediamine: the diverging roles of oxidation and N-acetylation for dendritic cell activation and the immune response. J Invest Dermatol 2009; 129: 99-109.
20. Koopmans AK, Bruynzeel DP,. Is PPD a useful screening agent? Contact Dermatitis 2003; 48: 89-92.
21. Gawkrodger DJ, English JS,. How safe is patch testing to PPD? Br J Dermatol 2006; 154: 1025-7.
22. Basketter DA, English J,. Cross-reactions among hair dye allergens. Cutan Ocul Toxicol 2009; 28: 104-6.
23. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products. Opinion on: 2-Methylresorcinol COLIPA No. A44. Adopted by the SCCP during the 18th Plenary Meeting on 16 December 2008. Brussels: European Commission, 2008.
24. Scientific Committee on Consumer Products. Opinion on: 2-Methyl-5-Hydroxyethylaminophenol COLIPA No. A31. Adopted by the SCCP during the 7th Plenary Meeting on 28 March 2006. Brussels: European Commission, 2006.
25. OECD. Guideline for Testing of Chemicals. Skin Absorption: In Vitro Method. Test Guideline 428, Adopted 13 April 2004. Paris: OECD, 2004.
26. OECD. Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 28. Guidance Document for the Conduct of Skin Absorption Studies. Paris: OECD, 2004.
27. Bracher M, Faller C, Noser FK,. Evaluation of an in vitro percutaneous permeation model with two oxidative hair dyes. Int J Cosmet Sci 1987; 9: 223-36.
28. Beck H, Bracher M, Faller C, Hofer H,. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo skin permeation of hair dyes. Cosmet Toiletries 1993; 108: 76-83.
29. Noser FK, Faller C, Bracher M,. In vitro permeation with pig skin: instrumentation and comparison of flow-through versus static-diffusion protocol. J Appl Cosmetol 1988; 6: 111-22.
30. Chan YC, Ng SK, Goh CL,. Positive patch-test reactions to para-phenylenediamine, their clinical relevance and the concept of clinical tolerance. Contact Dermatitis 2001; 45: 217-20.
31. Kawakubo Y, Merk HF, Masaoudi TA, et al. N-acetylation of paraphenylenediamine in human skin and keratinocytes. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2000; 292: 150-5.
32. Nohynek GJ, Skare JA, Meuling WJ, et al. Urinary acetylated metabolites and N-acetyltransferase-2 genotype in human subjects treated with a para-phenylenediamine-containing oxidative hair dye. Food Chem Toxicol 2004; 42: 1885-91.
33. Nohynek GJ, Duche D, Garrigues A, et al. Under the skin: biotransformation of para-aminophenol and para-phenylenediamine in reconstructed human epidermis and human hepatocytes. Toxicol Lett 2005; 158: 196-212.
34. Goebel C, Hewitt NJ, Kunze G, et al. Skin metabolism of aminophenols: human keratinocytes as a suitable in vitro model to qualitatively predict the dermal transformation of 4-amino-2-hydroxytoluene in vivo. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 2009; 235: 114-23.
35. Houben E, De Paepe K, Rogiers V,. A keratinocyte's course of life. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2007; 20: 122-32.
36. Krasteva M, Cottin M, Cristaudo A, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of the consumer open skin allergy test as a method of prediction of contact dermatitis to hair dyes. Eur J Dermatol 2005; 15: 18-25.