Remember-know judgments can depend on how memory is tested

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 117-122

  Hicks, Jason L ^a   Marsh, Richard L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; MEMORY; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; RANDOMIZATION; RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MEMORY; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0033084985     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03210818     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. CLARKE, F. R. (1960). Confidence ratings, second-choice responses and confusion matrices in intelligibility tests. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 32, 35-46.
2. CONWAY, M. A., & DEWHURST, S. A. (1995). Remembering, familiarity, and source monitoring. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 125-140.
3. DEWHURST, S. A., & CONWAY, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1088-1098.
4. DODSON, C. S., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1993). Rate of false attributions depends on how questions are asked. American Journal of Psychology, 106, 541-557.
5. DONALDSON, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 275-277.
6. DONALDSON, W. (1996). The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 523-533.
7. GARDINER, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory & Cognition, 16, 309-313.
8. GARDINER, J. M., GAWLIK, B., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1994). Maintenance rehearsal affects knowing, but not remembering; elaborative rehearsal affects remembering, not knowing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 107-110.
9. GARDINER, J. M., & GREGG, V. H. (1997). Recognition memory with little or no remembering: Implications for a detection model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 474-479.
10. GARDINER, J. M., & JAVA, R. I. (1990). Recollective experience in word and nonword recognition. Memory & Cognition, 18, 23-30.
11. GARDINER, J. M., JAVA, R. I., & RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A. (1996). How level of processing really influences awareness in recognition memory. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 114-122.
12. GREENE, R. L. (1996). Mirror effect in order and associative information: Role of response strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 687-695.
13. HEALY, A. F., & JONES, C. (1973). Criterion shifts in recall. Psychological Bulletin, 79, 335-340.
14. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (1998). A decrement to familiarity interpretation of the revelation effect from forced-choice tests of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 1105-1120.
15. HIRSHMAN, E., & HENZLER, A. (1998). The role of decision processes in conscious recollection. Psychological Science, 9, 61-65.
16. HIRSHMAN, E., & MASTER, S. (1997). Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 25, 345-351.
17. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
18. JACOBY, L. L., YONELINAS, A. P., & JENNINGS, J. M. (1997). The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the study of consciousness (pp. 13-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
20. LINDSAY, D. S., & KELLEY, C. M. (1996). Creating illusions of familiarity in a cued-recall remember/know paradigm. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 197-211.
21. MARSH, R. L., & LANDAU, J. D. (1995). Availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1568-1582.
22. MATHER, M., HENKEL, L. A., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.
23. PARKIN, A. J., & RUSSO, R. (1993). On the origin of functional differences in recollective experience. Memory, 1, 231-237.
24. PERFECT, T. J., MAYES, A. R., DOWNES, J. J., & VAN EIJK, R. (1996). Does context discriminate recollection from familiarity in recognition memory? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 797-813.
25. POLLACK, I., & DECKER, L. (1958). Confidence ratings, message reception, and the receiver operating characteristics. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 286-292.
26. RAJARAM, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
27. RAJARAM, S., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1997). Remembering and knowing as states of consciousness during recollection. In J. Cohen & J. W. Schooler (Eds.), Scientific approaches to the study of consciousness (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28. STRACK, F., & FÖRSTER, J. (1995). Reporting recollective experiences: Direct access to memory systems? Psychological Science, 6, 352-358.
29. THORNDIKE, E. L., & LORGE, I. (1944). The teacher's word book of 30,000 words. New York: Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
30. TULVING, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychologist, 40, 1-12.
31. YONELINAS, A. P., & JACOBY, L. L. (1995). The relation between remembering and knowing as bases for recognition: Effects of size congruency. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 622-643.