How hippocampus and cortex contribute to recognition memory: Revisiting the complementary learning systems model

Hippocampus

Volumn 20, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 1217-1227

  Norman, Kenneth A ^a  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Computational methods; Neural networks; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN CORTEX; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEASUREMENT; MEMORY; NONHUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECOGNITION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

CEREBRAL CORTEX; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; LEARNING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); ROC CURVE;

EID: 77958159615     PISSN: 10509631     EISSN: 10981063     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20855     Document Type: Article

References (83)

1. Aggleton JP, Brown MW. 1999. Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal-anterior thalamic axis. Behav Brain Sci 22: 425-490.
2. Anderson JR, Reder LM. 1999. The fan effect: New results and new theories. J Exp Psychol: Gen 128: 186.
3. Bakker A, Kirwan CB, Miller M, Stark CEL. 2008. Pattern separation in the human hippocampal CA3 and dentate gyrus. Science (New York, NY) 319: 1640-1642.
4. Barense MD, Bussey TJ, Lee AC, Rogers TT, Davies RR, Saksida LM, Murray EA, Graham KS. 2005. Functional specialization in the human medial temporal lobe. J Neurosci 25: 10239-10246.
5. Bayley PJ, Wixted JT, Hopkins RO, Squire LR. 2008. Yes/no recognition, forced-choice recognition, and the human hippocampus. J Cogn Neurosci 20: 505-512.
6. Becker S. 2005. A computational principle for hippocampal learning and neurogenesis. Hippocampus 15: 722-738.
7. Bogacz R, Brown MW. 2003. Comparison of computational models of familiarity discrimination in the perirhinal cortex. Hippocampus 13: 494-524.
8. Burgess N, O'Keefe J. 1996. Neuronal computations underlying the firing of place cells and their role in navigation. Hippocampus 6: 749-762.
9. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2002. The organisation of visual object representations: A connectionist model of effects of lesions in perirhinal cortex. Eur J Neurosci 15: 355-364.
10. Bussey TJ, Saksida LM, Murray EA. 2002. The role of perirhinal cortex in memory and perception: Conjunctive representations for object identification. In: Witter MP, Waterlood FG, editors. The Parahippocampal Region: Organisation and Role in Cognitive Functions. New York: Oxford.
11. Clark SE, Gronlund SD. 1996. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonom Bull Rev 3, 37-60.
12. Clelland CD, Choi M, Romberg C, Clemenson GD, Fragniere A, Tyers P, Jessberger S, Saksida LM, Barker RA, Gage FH, Bussey TJ. 2009. A functional role for adult hippocampal neurogenesis in spatial pattern separation. Science (New York, NY) 325: 210-213.
13. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2006. Why does brain damage impair memory? A connectionist model of object recognition memory in perirhinal cortex. J Neurosci 26: 12186-12197.
14. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010a. Components of recognition memory. Dissociable cognitive processes or just differences in representational complexity? Hippocampus. 20: 1245-1262
15. Cowell RA, Bussey TJ, Saksida LM. 2010b. Functional dissociations within the ventral object processing pathway: Cognitive modules or a hierarchical continuum? J Cogn Neurosci 22: 2460-2479.
16. Criss AH, Shiffrin RM. 2004. Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on dennis and humphreys (2001). Psychol Rev 111: 800-807.
17. Diana RA, Yonelinas AP, Ranganath C. 2007. Imaging recollection and familiarity in the medial temporal lobe: A three-component model. Trends Cogn Sci 11: 379-386.
18. Eichenbaum H, Otto T, Cohen NJ. 1994. Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system. Behav Brain Sci 17: 449-518.
19. Elfman KW, Parks CM, Yonelinas AP. 2008. Testing a neurocomputational model of recollection, familiarity, and source recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34: 752-768.
20. Fortin NJ, Wright SP, Eichenbaum HB. 2004. Recollection-like memory retrieval in rats is dependent on the hippocampus. Nature 431: 188-191.
21. Gardiner JM, Brandt KR, Baddeley AD, Vargha-Khadem F, Mishkin M. 2008. Charting the acquisition of semantic knowledge in a case of developmental amnesia. Neuropsychologia 46: 2865-2868.
22. Gillund G, Shiffrin RM. 1984. A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychol Rev 91: 1-67.
23. Grossberg S. 1976. Adaptive pattern classification and universal recoding. I. Parallel development and coding of neural feature detectors. Biol Cybernet 23: 121-134.
24. Grossberg S. 1986. The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behavior: Speech, language, and motor control. In: Scwab EC, Nusbaum HC, editors. Pattern Recognition in Humans and Machines, Vol. 1: Speech Perception. New York: Academic Press. p 187-294.
25. Grossberg S, Stone G. 1986. Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: Attentional priming, learning, and resonance. Psychol Rev 93: 46-74.
26. Hasselmo ME, Wyble B. 1997. Free recall and recognition in a network model of the hippocampus: Simulating effects of scopolamine on human memory function. Behav Brain Res 89: 1-34.
27. Hilford A, Glanzer M, Kim K, Decarlo LT. 2002. Regularities of source recognition: ROC analysis. J Exp Psychol: Gen 131: 494-510.
28. Hintzman DL. 1988. Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychol Rev 95: 528-551.
29. Hintzman DL, Curran T, Oppy B. 1992. Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 18: 667-680.
30. Holdstock JS, Mayes AR, Roberts N, Cezayirli E, Isaac CL, O'Reilly RC, Norman KA. 2002. Under what conditions is recognition spared relative to recall after selective hippocampal damage in humans? Hippocampus 12: 341-351.
31. Humphreys MS, Bain JD, Pike R. 1989. Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychol Rev 96: 208-233.
32. Jacoby LL, Yonelinas AP, Jennings JM. 1997. The relation between conscious and unconscious (automatic) influences: A declaration of independence. In: Cohen JD, Schooler JW, editors. Scientific Approaches to Consciousness. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. pp 13-47.
33. Kahana MJ, Sekuler R. 2002. Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vis Res 42: 2177-2192.
34. Koutstaal W, Schacter DL, Jackson EM. 1999. Perceptually based false recognition of novel objects in amnesia: Effects of category size and similarity to category prototypes. Cogn Neuropsychol 16: 317.
35. Leutgeb JK, Leutgeb S, Moser M-B, Moser EI. 2007. Pattern separation in the dentate gyrus and CA3 of the hippocampus. Science (New York, NY) 315: 961-966.
36. Li L, Miller EK, Desimone R. 1993. The representation of stimulus familiarity in anterior inferior temporal cortex. J Neurophysiol 69: 1918-1929.
37. Macmillan NA, Creelman CD. 2005. Detection Theory: A User's Guide, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. Malmberg KJ. 2008. Recognition memory: A review of the critical findings and an integrated theory for relating them. Cogn Psychol 57: 335-384.
39. Malmberg KJ, Xu J. 2006. The influence of averaging and noisy decision strategies on the recognition memory ROC. Psychonom Bull Rev 13: 99-105.
40. Marr D. 1971. Simple memory: A theory for archicortex. Philos Trans R Soc (Lond) B 262: 23-81.
41. Mayes AR, Isaac CL, Downes JJ, Holdstock JS, Hunkin NM, Montaldi D, MacDonald C, Cezayirli E, Roberts JN. 2001. Memory for single items, word pairs, and temporal order in a patient with selective hippocampal lesions. Cogn Neuropsychol 18: 97-123.
42. McClelland JL, McNaughton BL, O'Reilly RC. 1995. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: Insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychol Rev 102: 419-457.
43. McNaughton BL, Morris RGM. 1987. Hippocampal synaptic enhancement and information storage within a distributed memory system. Trends Neurosci 10: 408-415.
44. Migo E, Montaldi D, Norman KA, Quamme J, Mayes A. 2009. The contribution of familiarity to recognition memory is a function of test format when using similar foils. Quart J Exp Psychol 62: 1198-1215.
45. Moll M, Miikkulainen R. 1997. Convergence-zone episodic memory: Analysis and simulations. Neural Networks 10: 1017-1036.
46. Murdock BB. 1993. TODAM2: A model for the storage and retrieval of item, associative, and serial-order information. Psychol Rev 100: 183-203.
47. Norman KA, O'Reilly RC. 2003. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: A complementary-learning-systems approach. Psychol Rev 104: 611-646.
48. Norman KA, Newman EL, Perotte AJ. 2005. Methods for reducing interference in the complementary learning systems model: Oscillating inhibition and autonomous memory rehearsal. Neural Networks 18: 1212-1228.
49. Norman KA, Newman EL, Detre GJ, Polyn SM. 2006. How inhibitory oscillations can train neural networks and punish competitors. Neural Comput 18: 1577-1610.
50. Norman KA, Detre GJ, Polyn SM. 2008. Computational models of episodic memory. In: Sun R, editor. The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
51. Nosofsky R. 1988. Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 14: 700708.
52. O'Keefe J, Nadel L. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
53. O'Reilly RC, Rudy JW. 2001. Conjunctive representations in learning and memory: Principles of cortical and hippocampal function. Psychol Rev 108: 311-345.
54. O'Reilly RC, Norman KA. 2002. Hippocampal and neocortical contributions to memory: Advances in the complementary learning systems framework. Trends Cogn Sci 6: 505-510.
55. Ranganath C. 2010. A unified framework for the functional organization of the medial temporal lobes and the phenomenology of episodic memory. Hippocampus. 20: 1263-1290
56. Reder LM, Nhouyvanisvong A, Schunn CD, Ayers MS, Angstadt P, Hiraki KA. 2000. A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: A computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 26: 294-320.
57. Rolls ET. 1989. Functions of neuronal networks in the hippocampus and neocortex in memory. In: Byrne JH, Berry WO, editors. Neural Models of Plasticity: Experimental and Theoretical Approaches. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. pp 240-265.
58. Sauvage MM, Fortin NJ, Owens CB, Yonelinas AP, Eichenbaum H. 2008. Recognition memory: Opposite effects of hippocampal damage on recollection and familiarity. Nat Neurosci 11: 16-18.
59. Scoville WB, Milner B. 1957. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 20: 11-21.
60. Sherry DF, Schacter DL. 1987. The evolution of multiple memory systems. Psychol Rev 94: 439-454.
61. Shiffrin RM, Huber DE, Marinelli K. 1995. Effects of category length and strength on familiarity in recognition. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 21: 267-287.
62. Shiffrin RM, Steyvers M. 1997. A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonom Bull Rev 4: 145-166.
63. Shimamura AP, Wickens TD. 2009. Superadditive memory strength for item and source recognition: The role of hierarchical relational binding in the medial temporal lobe. Psychol Rev 116: 1-19.
64. Squire LR. 1992. Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans. Psychol Rev 99: 195-231.
65. Squire LR, Wixted JT, Clark RE. 2007. Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 8: 872-883.
66. Sutherland RJ, Rudy JW. 1989. Configural association theory: The role of the hippocampal formation in learning, memory, and amnesia. Psychobiology 17: 129-144.
67. Teyler TJ, Discenna P. 1986. The hippocampal memory indexing theory. Behav Neurosci 100: 147-154.
68. Treves A, Rolls ET. 1994. A computational analysis of the role of the hippocampus in memory. Hippocampus 4: 374-392.
69. Viskontas IV, Knowlton BJ, Steinmetz PN, Fried I. 2006. Differences in mnemonic processing by neurons in the human hippocampus and parahippocampal regions. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 1654-1662.
70. Watkins OC, Watkins MJ. 1975. Buildup of proactive inhibition as a cue-overload effect. Hum Learn 104: 442-452.
71. Westerberg CE, Paller KA, Weintraub S, Mesulam MM, Holdstock JS, Mayes AR, Reber PJ. 2006. When memory does not fail: Familiarity-based recognition in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 20: 193-205.
72. Wixted JT. 2007. Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. Psychol Rev 114: 152-176.
73. Wixted JT, Squire LR. 2008. Constructing receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) with experimental animals: Cautionary notes. Learn Mem 15: 687-690.
74. Wu X, Baxter RA, Levy WB. 1996. Context codes and the effect of noisy learning on a simplified hippocampal CA3 model. Biol Cybernet 74: 159-165.
75. Xiang JZ, Brown MW. 1998. Differential encoding of novelty, familiarity, and recency in regions of the anterior temporal lobe. Neuropharmacology 37: 657-676.
76. Yonelinas AP. 1994. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 20: 1341-1354.
77. Yonelinas AP. 2001. Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 Cs of recognition memory. J Exp Psychol: Gen 130: 361-379.
78. Yonelinas AP. 2002. The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. J Mem Lang 46: 441-517.
79. Yonelinas AP, Parks CM. 2007. Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) in recognition memory: A review. Psychol Bull 133: 800-832.
80. Yonelinas AP, Kroll NEA, Dobbins I, Lazzara M, Knight RT. 1998. Recollection and familiarity deficits in amnesia: Convergence of remember-know, process dissociation, and receiver operating characteristic data. Neuropsychology 12: 323-339.
81. Yonelinas AP, Kroll NE, Quamme JR, Lazzara MM, Sauve MJ, Widaman KF, Knight RT. 2002. Effects of extensive temporal lobe damage or mild hypoxia on recollection and familiarity. Nat Neurosci 5: 1236-1241.
82. Yotsumoto Y, Kahana MJ, Wilson HR, Sekuler R. 2007. Recognition memory for realistic synthetic faces. Mem Cogn 35: 1233-1244.
83. Zaki S, Nosofsky R. 2001. Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 27: 10221041.