The evolutionary ecology of cytonuclear interactions in angiosperms

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 638-643

  Caruso, Christina M ^a   Case, Andrea L ^b   Bailey, Maia F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PROVIDENCE COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; ECOLOGY; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; FLOWER; GENETICS; MITOCHONDRIAL GENE; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT GENE; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANGIOSPERMS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; CELL NUCLEUS; CYTOPLASM; ECOLOGY; FERTILITY; FLOWERS; GENES, MITOCHONDRIAL; GENES, PLANT; PHYLOGENY; POLLINATION; REPRODUCTION; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 84868210737     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.06.006     Document Type: Review

References (59)

1. Budar F., Roux F. The role of organelle genomes in plant adaptation: time to get to work!. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:635-639.
2. Burt A., Trivers R. Genes in Conflict 2006, Harvard University Press.
3. Johnson N.A. Hybrid incompatibility genes: remnants of a genomic battlefield?. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:317-325.
4. Werren J.H. Selfish genetic elements, genetic conflict, and evolutionary innovation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10863-10870.
5. Dowling D.K., et al. Evolutionary implications of non-neutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2008, 23:546-554.
6. Dowling D.K., et al. Temperature-specific outcomes of cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions on egg-to-adult development time in seed beetles. Evolution 2007, 61:194-201.
7. Sambatti J.B.M., et al. Ecological selection maintains cytonuclear incompatibilities in hybridizing sunflowers. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11:1082-1091.
8. Willett C.S. The nature of interactions that contribute to postzygotic reproductive isolation in hybrid copepods. Genetica 2011, 139:575-588.
9. Willett C.S., Burton R.S. Environmental influences on epistatic interactions: viabilities of cytochrome c genotypes in interpopulation crosses. Evolution 2003, 57:2286-2292.
10. Chase C.D., et al. Male sterility. Plant Developmental Biology, Biotechnological Perspectives 2010, 437-457. Springer Verlag. E.C. Pua, M.R. Davey (Eds.).
11. Zeh J.A., Zeh D.W. Maternal inheritance, sexual conflict and the maladapted male. Trends Genet. 2005, 21:281-286.
12. Tiffin P., et al. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 2001, 268:861-867.
13. Bailey M.F., Delph L.F. A field guide to models of sex-ratio evolution in gynodioecious species. Oikos 2007, 116:1609-1617.
14. Rieseberg L.H., Blackman B.K. Speciation genes in plants. Ann. Bot. 2010, 106:439-455.
15. Jacobs M.S., Wade M.J. A synthetic review of the theory of gynodioecy. Am. Nat. 2003, 161:837-851.
16. Barr C.M., Fishman L. The nuclear component of a cytonuclear hybrid incompatibility in Mimulus maps to a cluster of pentatricopeptide repeat genes. Genetics 2010, 184:455-465.
17. Case A.L., Caruso C.M. A novel approach to estimating the cost of male fertility restoration in gynodioecious plants. New Phytol. 2010, 186:549-557.
18. Spigler R.B., Ashman T.-L. Gynodioecy to dioecy: are we there yet?. Ann. Bot. 2012, 109:531-543.
19. Fishman L., Willis J.H. A cytonuclear incompatibility causes anther sterility in Mimulus hybrids. Evolution 2006, 60:1372-1381.
20. Scopece G., et al. Polymorphism of postmating reproductive isolation within plant species. Taxon 2010, 59:1367-1374.
21. Cutter A.D. The polymorphic prelude to Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:209-218.
22. Dufäy M., et al. Variation in pollen production and pollen viability in natural populations of gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima: evidence for a cost of restoration of male function?. J. Evol. Biol. 2008, 21:202-212.
23. Bailey M.F. A cost of restoration of male fertility in a gynodioecious species, Lobelia siphilitica. Evolution 2002, 56:2178-2186.
24. del Castillo R.F., Trujillo S. Evidence of restoration cost in the annual gynodioecious Phacelia dubia. J. Evol. Biol. 2009, 22:306-313.
25. de Haan A.A., et al. Effects of CMS types and restorer alleles on plant performance in Plantago lanceolata L.: an indication for cost of restoration. J. Evol. Biol. 1997, 10:803-820.
26. Murayama K., et al. Variation of female frequency and cytoplasmic male-sterility gene frequency among natural gynodioecious populations of wild radish (Raphanus sativus L.). Mol. Ecol. 2004, 13:2459-2464.
27. Frank S.A., Barr C.M. Spatial dynamics of cytoplasmic male sterility. Integrating Ecology and Evolution in a Spatial Context 2001, 219-243. Blackwell. J. Silvertown, J. Antonovics (Eds.).
28. McCauley D.E., Bailey M.F. Recent advances in the study of gynodioecy: the interface of theory and empiricism. Ann. Bot. 2009, 104:611-620.
29. Lynch M., Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits 1998, Sinauer Associates.
30. Burd M., et al. Ovule number per flower in a world of uncertain pollination. Am. J. Bot. 2009, 96:1159-1167.
31. Charnov E.L. Sex Allocation Theory 1982, Princeton University Press.
32. Conner J.K., Hartl D.L. A Primer of Ecological Genetics 2004, Sinauer Associates.
33. Delph L.F., et al. How environmental factors affect pollen performance: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Ecology 1997, 78:1632-1639.
34. Barnabas B., et al. The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ. 2008, 31:11-38.
35. Mutikainen P., Delph L.F. Effects of herbivory on male reproductive success in plants. Oikos 1996, 75:353-358.
36. Hedhly A., et al. Global warming and sexual plant reproduction. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:30-36.
37. Inouye D.W., et al. A model and lexicon for pollen fate. Am. J. Bot. 1994, 81:1517-1530.
38. Harder L.D., Thomson J.D. Evolutionary options for maximizing pollen dispersal of animal-pollinated plants. Am. Nat. 1989, 133:323-344.
39. de Cauwer I., et al. Effects of fine-scale genetic structure on male mating success in gynodioecious Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:1540-1558.
40. Cuguen J., et al. Gynodioecy and mitochondrial DNA polymorphism in natural populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima. Genet. Sel. Evol. 1994, 26:S87-S101.
41. Delph L.F., Bailey M.F. The nearness of you: the effect of population structure on siring success in a gynodioecious species. Mol. Ecol. 2010, 19:1520-1522.
42. Case A.L., Willis J.H. Hybrid male sterility in Mimulus (Phrymaceae) is associated with a geographically restricted mitochondrial rearrangement. Evolution 2008, 62:1026-1039.
43. Fujii S., et al. Selection patterns on restorer-like genes reveal a conflict between nuclear and mitochondrial genomes throughout angiosperm evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:1723-1728.
44. Leppala J., Savolainen O. Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions reduce male fertility in hybrids of Arabidopsis lyrata subspecies. Evolution 2011, 65:2959-2972.
45. Delph L.F., et al. Merging theory and mechanism in studies of gynodioecy. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:17-24.
46. Ashman T.-L. The evolution of separate sexes: a focus on the ecological context. The Ecology and Evolution of Flowers 2006, 419-465. Oxford University Press. L.D. Harder, S.C.H. Barrett (Eds.).
47. Friedman J., Barrett S.C.H. Wind of change: new insights on the ecology and evolution of pollination and mating in wind-pollinated plants. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1515-1527.
48. Wilson P., et al. Beyond floral Batemania: gender biases in selection for pollination success. Am. Nat. 1994, 143:283-296.
49. Dorken M.E., Van Drunen W.E. Sex allocation in clonal plants: might clonal expansion enhance fitness gains through male function?. Evol. Ecol. 2010, 24:1463-1474.
50. Lloyd D.G. Gender allocation in outcrossing cosexual plants. Perspectives on Plant Population Ecology 1984, 277-300. Sinauer Associates. R. Dirzo, J. Sarukhan (Eds.).
51. Bomblies K. Doomed lovers: mechanisms of isolation and incompatibility in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:109-124.
52. Foxe J.P., Wright S.I. Signature of diversifying selection on members of the pentatricopeptide repeat protein family in Arabidopsis lyrata. Genetics 2009, 183:663-672.
53. Mackenzie S.A. The unique biology of mitochondrial genome instability in plants. Plant Mitochondria 2007, 36-49. Blackwell. D.C. Logan (Ed.).
54. Palmer J.D., Herbon L.A. Plant mitochondrial DNA evolves rapidly in structure, but slowly in sequence. J. Mol. Evol. 1988, 28:87-97.
55. Hanson M.R., Bentolila S. Interactions of mitochondrial and nuclear genes that affect male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 2004, 16:S154-S169.
56. Fujii S., Small I. The evolution of RNA editing and pentatricopeptide repeat genes. New Phytol. 2011, 191:37-47.
57. Bellaoui M., et al. The steady-state level of mRNA from the Ogura cytoplasmic male sterility locus in Brassica cybrids is determined post-transcriptionally by its 3' region. EMBO J. 1997, 16:5057-5068.
58. Bailey M.F., et al. Modeling gynodioecy: novel scenarios for maintaining polymorphism. Am. Nat. 2003, 161:762-776.
59. Richards A.J. Plant Breeding Systems 1986, Allen and Unwin.