The consequences of lactobacillus vini and dekkera bruxellensis as contaminants of the sugarcane-Based ethanol fermentation

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 39, Issue 11, 2012, Pages 1645-1650

  De Souza, Rafael Barros ^a,b   Santos, Billy Manoel Dos ^a   De Fátima Rodrigues De Souza, Raquel ^a,b   Da Silva, Paula Katharina Nogueira ^a   Lucena, Brígida Thais Luckwu ^a,c   De Morais, Marcos Antonio ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PERNAMBUCO   (Brazil)

^b CETENE   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINA GRANDE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Contaminant yeast; Lactic acid bacteria; Microbial interaction

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DEKKERA; DEKKERA BRUXELLENSIS; FERMENTATION; FUNGUS CULTURE; FUNGUS GROWTH; LACTOBACILLUS; LACTOBACILLUS VINI; NONHUMAN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SUGARCANE; YEAST CELL;

BIOTECHNOLOGY; CARBOHYDRATE METABOLISM; DEKKERA; DRUG CONTAMINATION; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS; RECYCLING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHARUM;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); DEKKERA BRUXELLENSIS; LACTOBACILLUS VINI; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84868197784     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: 14765535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-012-1167-0     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Basílio ACM, Araújo PRL, Morais JOF, Silva Filho EA, Morais MA Jr, Simoes DA (2008) Detection and identification of wild yeast contaminants of the industrial fuel ethanol fermentation process. Curr Microbiol 56:322-326
2. Basso LC, Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML (2008) Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. FEMS Yeast Res 8:1155-1163
3. Bayrock D, Ingledew WM (2001) Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27: 39-45 (Pubitemid 32959930)
4. Chang I-S, Kim B-H, Shin P-K, Lee W-K (1995) Bacterial contamination and its effect on ethanol fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 5:309-314
5. De Barros Pita W, Leite FCB, De Souza Liberal AT, Simoes DA, de Morais MA Jr (2011) The ability to use nitrate confers advantage to Dekkera bruxellensis over S. cerevisiae and can explain its adaptation to industrial fermentation processes. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100:99-107
6. de Oliva-Neto P, Yokoya F (1994) Evaluation of bacterial contamination in a fed-batch alcoholic fermentation process. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10:967-999
7. De Souza Liberal ATS, Basílio ACM, Brasileiro BTRV, Silva Filho EA, Simoes DA, Morais MA Jr (2007) Identification of the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis as major contaminant in continuous fuel ethanol fermentation. J Appl Microbiol 102:538-547 (Pubitemid 46115021)
8. Lucena BTL, Santos BM, Moreira JLS, Moreira APB, Nunes AC, Azevedo V, Miyoshi A, Thompson FL, De Morais MA Jr (2010) Diversity of lactic acid bacteria of the bioethanol process. BMC Microbiol 10:e298
9. Narendranath NV, Hynes SH, Thomas KC, Ingledew MW (1997) Effects of Lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4158-4163 (Pubitemid 27485733)
10. Passoth V, Blomqvist J, Schnürer J (2007) Dekkera bruxellensis and Lactobacillus vini form a stable ethanol-producing consortium in a commercial alcohol production process. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:4354-4356 (Pubitemid 47068178)
11. Pereira LF, Bassi APG, Avansini SH, Barbosa-Neto AG, Brasileiro BTRV, Ceccato-Antonini SR, de Morais MA Jr (2011) The physiological characteristics of the yeast Dekkera bruxellensis in fully fermentative conditions with cell recycling and in mixed cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek (Epub ahead of print doi:10.1007/s10482-011-9662-2)
12. Rodas AM, Chenoll E, Macián MC, Ferrer S, Pardo I, Aznar R (2004) Lactobacillus vini sp. nov., a wine lactic acid bacterium homofermentative for pentoses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:513-517
13. Schell DJ, Dowe N, Ibsen KN, Riley CJ, Ruth MF, Lumpkin RE (2007) Contaminant occurrence, identification and control in a pilot-scale corn fiber to ethanol conversion process. Bioresour Technol 98:2942-2948 (Pubitemid 46604795)
14. Silva-Filho EA, Santos SKB, Resende AM, Morais JOF, Morais MA Jr, Simoes DA (2005) Yeast population dynamics of industrial fuel-ethanol fermentation process assessed by PCR-fingerprinting. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 88:13-23
15. Skinner KA, Leathers TD (2004) Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 31:401-408 (Pubitemid 40012721)
16. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2001) Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash. J Appl Microbiol 90:819-828 (Pubitemid 32391789)