Bacterial contaminants of fuel ethanol production

Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 401-408

  Skinner, Kelly A ^a   Leathers, Timothy D ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Bacterial contamination; Dry grind; Fuel ethanol; Lactobacillus; Wet mill

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL; ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; FUEL;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL INFECTION; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATE; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS; NONHUMAN; YEAST;

BACTERIA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ENERGY-GENERATING RESOURCES; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; TIME FACTORS; ZEA MAYS;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LACTOBACILLUS; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 10944256640     PISSN: 13675435     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10295-004-0159-0     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Anonymous (2003) Building a secure energy future. Ethanol industry outlook 2003. Renewable Fuels Association, Washington
2. Anonymous (2003) The world of corn. National Corn Growers Association, St. Louis
3. Aquarone E (1960) Penicillin and tetracycline as contamination control agents in alcoholic fermentation of sugar cane molasses. Appl Microbiol 8:263-268
4. Bayrock D, Ingledew WM (2001) Changes in steady state on introduction of a Lactobacillus contaminant to a continuous culture ethanol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:39-45
5. Chang IS, Kim BH, Shin PK, Lee WK (1995) Bacterial contamination and its effects on ethanol fermentation. J Microbiol Biotechnol 5:309-314
6. Chang IS, Kim BH, Shin PK (1997) Use of sulfite and hydrogen peroxide to control bacterial contamination in ethanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:1
7. Chin PM, Ingledew WM (1994) Effect of lactic acid bacteria on wheat mash fermentations prepared with laboratory backset. Enzyme Microbial Technol 16:311-317
8. Connolly C (1999) Bacterial contaminants and their effects on alcohol production. In: Jacques K, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 317-334
9. Dien BS, Bothast RJ, Nichols NJ, Cotta MA (2002) The U.S. corn ethanol industry: an overview of current technology and future prospects. Int Sugar J 104:204-211
10. Essia Ngang JJ, Letourneau F, Wolniewicz E, Villa P (1990) Inhibition of beet molasses alcoholic fermentation by lactobacilli. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 33:490-493
11. Gibbons WR, Westby CA (1986) Use of potassium metabisulfite to control bacterial contaminants during fermentation of fodder beet cubes for fuel ethanol. Biomass 11:99-113
12. Hough JS, Briggs DE, Stevens R, Young TW (1982) Microbial contamination in breweries. In: Malting and brewing science: hopped wart and beer, vol 2. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 741-775
13. Hynes SH, Kjarsgaard DM, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (1997) Use of virginiamycin to control the growth of lactic acid bacteria during alcohol fermentation. J Ind Microbiol 18:284-291
14. Ingledew WM (1999) Alcohol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a yeast primer. In: Jacques K, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 49-87
15. Johnson LA, May JB (2003) Wet milling: the basis for corn biorefineries. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. Am Assoc Cereal Chem, St. Paul, pp 449-494
16. Keim CR (1999) The wet-milling process: the basis for corn wet milling alcohol production. In: Jacques K, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook, 3rd edn. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 39-48
17. Leathers TD (1998) Upgrading fuel ethanol coproducts. Soc Ind Microbiol News 48:210-217
18. MacDonald T, Yowell G, McCormack M (2001) U.S. ethanol industry; production capacity outlook. California Energy Commission. P600-01-017
19. Maiorella B, Blanch HW, Wilke CR (1983) By-product inhibition effects on ethanolic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 25:103-121
20. Maisch WF (2003) Fermentation products and processes. In: White PJ, Johnson LA (eds) Corn: chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. Am Assoc Cereal Chem, St. Paul, pp 695-721
21. Makanjuola DB, Tymon A, Springham DG (1992) Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentation. Enzyme Microb Technol 14:350-357
22. Narendranath NV, Hynes SH, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (1997) Effects of lactobacilli on yeast-catalyzed ethanol fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:4158-4163
23. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2000) Urea hydrogen peroxide reduces the numbers of lactobacilli, nourishes yeast, and leaves no residues in the ethanol fermentation. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4187-4192
24. Narendranath NV, Thomas KC, Ingledew WM (2001) Acetic acid and lactic acid inhibition of growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by different mechanisms. J Am Soc Brew Chem 59:187-194
25. Oliva-Neto P, Yokoya F (1998) Effect of 3,4,4′-trichlorocarbanilide on growth of lactic acid bacteria contaminants in alcoholic fermentation. Bioresour Technol 63:17
26. Oliva-Neto P, Yokoya F (1994) Evaluation of bacterial contamination in a fed-batch alcoholic fermentation process. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 10:697-699
27. Rainbow C (1971) Spoilage organisms in breweries. Process Biochem 6:15-17, 31
28. Stroppa CT, Andrietta MGS, Andrietta SR, Steckelberg C, Serra GE (2000) Use of penicillin and monensin to control bacterial contamination of Brazilian alcohol fermentations. Int Sugar J 102:78-82
29. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2001) Effect of lactobacilli on yeast growth, viability and batch and semi-continuous alcoholic fermentation of corn mash. J Appl Microbiol 90:819-828
30. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM (2002) Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:1616-1623
31. Torre P (1999) Co-products from ethanol fermentation: alternatives for the future. In: Jacques K, Lyons TP, Kelsall DR (eds) The alcohol textbook. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham, pp 335-346