Motivational Implications of Faculty Performance Standards

Educational Management Administration and Leadership

Volumn 40, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 724-751

  Hardré, Patricia L ^a   Kollmann, Sherry L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

faculty work; higher education; motivation; performance standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867956692     PISSN: 17411432     EISSN: 17411440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1741143212456913     Document Type: Article

References (104)

1. Alpert D.Performance and paralysis: the organizational context of the American research university.Journal of Higher Education. 1985;56:241-281.
2. Amabile TM,Goldfarb P,Brackfield SC.Social influences ion creativity: evaluation, coactions, surveillance.Creativity Research Journal. 1990;3:6-21.
3. Angle HL,Perry JL.Organizational commitment: individual and organizational influences.Work and Occupations. 1994;10 (2): 123-146.
4. Atkinson JWAn Introduction to Motivation. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand; 1964:.
5. Bailey JG.Academics' motivation and self-efficacy for teaching and research.Higher Education Research & Development. 1999;18 (3): 343-359.
6. Baldwin RG,Blackburn RT.The academic career as a developmental process.Journal of Higher Education. 1981;52:598-614.
7. Bandura ASelf-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W.H. Freeman; 1997:.
8. Bandura A,Cervone D.Differential engagement of self-reactive influences in cognitive motivation.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1986;38:92-113.
9. Bentley RJ,Blackburn RT.Changes in academic research performance over time: a study of institutional accumulated advantage.Research in Higher Education. 1991;31 (4): 327-353.
10. Blackburn RT,Bieber JP,Lawrence JH, et al.Faculty at work: focus on research, scholarship, and service.Research in Higher Education. 1991;32 (4): 385-413.
11. Bono JE,Judge TA.Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders.Academy of Management Journal. 2003;46:554-571.
12. Boyer EScholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1990:.
13. Braskamp LA,Ory JCAssessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1994:.
14. Braxton JM,Hargens LLHigher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Smart JC, ed. New York: Agathon Press; 1996:1-46.
15. Braxton J,Luckey W,Holland PInstitutionalizing a Broader View of Scholarship Through Boyer's Four Domains. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2002:.
16. Brehm SS,Brehm JWPsychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control. New York: Academic Press; 1981:.
17. Bucheit S,Collins AB,Collins DL.Intra-institutional factors that influence accounting research productivity.Journal of Applied Business Research. 2001;17 (2): 17-32.
18. Carnegie Foundation (2006) The Carnegie classification of institutions of higher education. Available at: http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/classifications(accessed 24 April 2006).
19. Cellar DF,Degrendel D,Sidle S, et al.Effects of goal type on performance, task interest and affect over time.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1996;26 (9): 804-824.
20. Chen Y,Gupta A,Hoshower L.Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: an expectancy theory analysis.Journal of Education for Business. 2006;81 (4): 179-189.
21. Cooper-Hakim A,Viswesvaran C.The construct of work commitment: testing an integrative framework.Psychological Bulletin. 2005;131 (2): 241-259.
22. Deci ELWhy We Do What We Do: Understanding Self-Motivation. New York: Penguin Books; 1995:.
23. Deci EL,Connell JP,Ryan RM.Self-determination in a work organization.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1989;74:580-590.
24. Deci EL,Eghrari H,Patrick BC, et al.Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective.Journal of Personality. 1994;62:119-142.
25. Deci EL,Ryan RMImproving Academic Achievement: Contributions of Social Psychology. Aronson J, ed. New York: Academic Press; 2002:59-85.
26. Diamond RMRecognizing Faculty Work: Reward Systems for the Year 2000. New Directions for Higher Education. Diamond RMAdams BE, ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1993:5-12.
27. Dweck CSSelf-Theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development. Ann Arbor, MI: Psychology Press; 1999:.
28. Erez M,Gopher D,Arzi N.Effects of goal difficulty, self-set goals, and monetary rewards on dual task performance.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1990;47:247-269.
29. Fairweather JSFaculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon; 1996:.
30. Fairweather JSFaculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions, and Issues. Tierney WG, ed. New York: Falmer Press; 1999:55-98.
31. Fairweather JS.The mythologies of faculty productivity: implications for institutional policy and decision-making.Journal of Higher Education. 2002;73 (1): 26-48.
32. Feldman KA.Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration.Research in Higher Education. 1987;26:227-298.
33. Feldman KA,Paulsen MB.Faculty motivation: the role of a supportive teaching culture.New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 1999;78:71-78.
34. Fitzpatrick JL,Sanders JR,Worthen BRProgram Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. 2004) Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines, 3rd edn. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman.New York: Addison-Wesley Longman; 2004:.
35. Frese M,Zapf DHandbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Triandis HCDunnette MDHough L, ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1994:271-340.
36. Gagné M,Deci EL.Self-determination theory and work motivation.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2005;26:331-362.
37. Gagné M,Koestner R,Zuckerman M.Facilitating acceptance of organizational change: the importance of self-determination.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2000;30 (9): 1843-1852.
38. Gagné M,Senecal CB,Koestner R.Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: a multidimensional model.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1997;:1222-1240.
39. Gappa JM,Austin AE,Trice AGRethinking Faculty Work: Higher Education's Strategic Imperative. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007:.
40. Gmelch WH,Wilke PK,Lovrich NP.Dimensions of stress among university faculty: factor-analytic results from a national study.Research in Higher Education. 1986;24 (3): 266-286.
41. Goodwin TH,Sauer RD.Life cycle productivity in academic research: evidence from cumulative publication histories of academic economists.Southern Economic Journal. 1995;61 (3): 728-743.
42. Greenberg JJustice in the Workplace: Approaching Fairness in Human Resource Management. Cropanzano R, ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1993:79-103.
43. Greenberg JA Handbook of Principles of Organizational Behavior. Locke EA, ed. London: Blackwell; 2000:191-195.
44. Greenberg J,Bies RJ,Eskew DEApplying Impression Management: How Image Making Affects Managerial Decision Making. Giacalone RARosenfeld P, ed. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE; 1991:111-132.
45. Hardré PL,Cox M.Evaluating Faculty Work: Expectations and Standards of Faculty Performance in Research-Extensive Universities.Research Papers in Education. 2009;24 (4): 383-419.
46. Hardré PL,Miller RB.Toward a current, comprehensive, integrative, and flexible model of motivation for instructional design.Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2006;19 (3): 25-52.
47. Hardré PL,Reeve J.Benefits of training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees.International Journal of Training & Development. 2009;13 (3): 165-184.
48. Hardré PL,Beesley A,Miller R, et al.Faculty Motivation for Research: Across Disciplines in Research-Extensive Universities.Journal of the Professoriate. 2011;5 ((2)): 35-69.
49. Hardré PL,Cox M,Kollmann S.Expectations and standards of faculty success within and between disciplines in research-extensive universities.Journal of Faculty Development. 2010;24 (3):.
50. Hardré PL,Ge X,Thomas M.An investigation of the development of instructional design expertise.Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2007;19 (4): 55-82.
51. Hardré PL,Miller RB,Beasley A, et al.What motivates university faculty members to do research?: tenure-track faculty in research-extensive universities.Journal of the Professoriate. 2007;2 (1): 75-100.
52. Hearn JCFaculty Productivity: Facts, Fictions and Issues. Tierney W, ed. New York: Falmer; 1999:123-173.
53. Hu Q,Gill GT.IS faculty research productivity: influential factors and implications.Information Resources Management Journal. 2000;13 (2): 15-25.
54. Judy RW,D'Amico CWorkforce 2020: Work and Workers in the 21st Century. Indianapolis, IN: Hudson Institute; 1997:.
55. JuneAW (2008) A helping hand for young faculty members. In: The Chronicle of Higher Education. 12 September. Available at: http://chronicle.com/weekly.v55/i03/03a01001.htm(accessed 12 September 2008).
56. Kaplan E,Erez M,Van-Dijk D2004:.
57. Kasten KL.Tenure and merit pay as rewards for research, teaching and service at a research university.Journal of Higher Education. 1984;55 (4): 500-514.
58. Katz D,Kahn RLThe Psychology of Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 1996:.
59. Landino RA,Owen SV.Self-efficacy in university faculty.Journal of Vocational Behavior. 1988;33:1-14.
60. Latham GPWork Motivation. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2007:.
61. Latham GP,Wexley KNIncreasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal. 1993) Increasing Productivity Through Performance Appraisal, 2nd edn. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley; 1993:.
62. Lee JJ,Rhoads RA.Faculty entrepreneurialism and the challenge to undergraduate education at research universities.Research in Higher Education. 2004;45 (7): 739-760.
63. Levin SG,Stephan PE.Age and research productivity of academic scientists.Research in Higher Education. 1989;30 (5): 531-549.
64. Levitan AS,Ray R.Personal and institutional characteristics affecting research productivity of academic accountants.Journal of Education for Business. 1992;67 (6): 335-341.
65. Locke EA,Henne DInternational Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Cooper CLRobertson I, ed. New York: Wiley; 1986:1-35.
66. Locke EA,Latham GP.Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: a 35-year odyssey.American Psychologist. 2002;57 (9): 705-717.
67. Locke EA,Shaw KN,Saari LM, et al.Goal setting and task performance 1969-1980.Psychological Bulletin. 1981;90:125-152.
68. Massy WF,Zemsky R.Faculty discretionary time: departments and the 'academic ratchet'.Journal of Higher Education. 1994;65 (1): 1-22.
69. Mathieu JE,Button SB.An examination of the relative impact of normative information and self-efficacy on personal goals and performance over time.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1992;22 (22): 1758-1775.
70. McClelland DCThe Achieving Society. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand; 1961:.
71. McGregor DMThe Human Side of the Enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1960:.
72. McKeachie WJ.Student ratings of faculty: a reprise.Acadème. 1979;October:384-397.
73. Meyer JP,Allen NP.A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment.Human Resource Management Review. 1991;1 (1): 61-89.
74. Meyer JP,Becker TE,Vandenberghe C.Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model.Journal of Applied Psychology. 2004;89:991-1007.
75. Meyer JP,Herscovitch L.Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model.Human Resource Development Review. 2001;11:299-326.
76. Middaugh MFUnderstanding Faculty Productivity: Standards and Benchmarks for Colleges and Universities. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001:.
77. Miller RIEvaluating Faculty for Promotion and Tenure. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1988:.
78. Mowday RT,Porter LM,Steers RMEmployee-Organizational Linkage. New York: Academic Press; 1982:.
79. Newell S,Price J.Promotion, merit and tenure decisions for college health education faculty.Health Education. 1983;14 (93): 12-15.
80. O'Meara K.Believing is seeing: the influence of beliefs and expectations on posttenure review in one state system.The Review of Higher Education. 2003;27 (1): 17-43.
81. O'Meara KA,Rice REFaculty Priorities Reconsidered: Rewarding Multiple Forms of Scholarship. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2005:.
82. O'Reilly CA,Caldwell DF.Job choice: the impact of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on subsequent satisfaction and commitment.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1980;65 (5): 559-565.
83. O'Reilly CA,Chatman J.Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: the effects of compliance, identification and internalization on prosocial behavior.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1986;71 (3): 492-499.
84. Ozer EM,Bandura A.Mechanisms governing empowerment effects: a self-efficacy analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1990;58 (3): 472-486.
85. Peters T,Waterman RIn Search of Excellence. New York: Harper Collins; 1982:.
86. Reeve J,Jang H,Hardré PL, et al.Providing a rationale for an uninteresting activity as a motivating strategy to support another's self-determined extrinsic motivation.Motivation and Emotion. 2003;26 (3): 183-207.
87. Reis HT,Sheldon KM,Gable SL, et al.Daily well-being: the role of autonomy, competence and relatedness.Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin. 2000;26 (4): 419-435.
88. Richer SF,Vallerand RJ.Supervisors' interactional styles and subordinates' intrinsic and extrinsic motivation.Journal of Social Psychology. 1995;:707-722.
89. Richer SF,Blanchard C,Vallerand RJ.A motivational model of work turnover.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 2002;:2089-2113.
90. Rummler GA,Brache APImproving Performance: How to Manage the White Space on the Organizational Chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1995:.
91. Ryan RM,Deci EL.Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.American Psychologist. 2000;55:68-78.
92. Ryan RM,Deci ELHandbook on Self & Identity. Leary MRTangney JP, ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2003:253-274.
93. Ryan RM,Mims V,Koestner R.Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1983;45:736-750.
94. Sansone C,Harackiewicz JMIntrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: The Search for Optimal Motivation and Performance. New York: Academic Press; 2000:.
95. Seijts GH,Latham GPProblems and Solutions in Human Assessment. Goffin RHelmes E, ed. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000:.
96. Serow RC.Research and teaching at a research university.Higher Education. 2000;40:449-463.
97. Stake RThe Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 1995:.
98. Swanson R,Holton EFoundations of Human Resource Development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler; 2001:.
99. Teodorescu P.Correlates of faculty productivity: a cross-national analysis.Higher Education. 2000;39:201-222.
100. Tien FF.To what degree does the desire for promotion motivate faculty to perform research?.Research in Higher Education. 2000;41 (6): 723-752.
101. Vallerand RJ,Reid G.On the causal effects of perceived competence on intrinsic motivation: a test of cognitive evaluation theory.Journal of Sport Psychology. 1984;6:94-102.
102. Vroom VHGreat Minds in Management: The Process of Theory Development. Smith KHitt M, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2005:239-258.
103. Walker CJPost-Tenure Faculty Review and Renewal. Licata CMMorreale JC, ed. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education; 2002:.
104. Werbel J,Gould S.A comparison of the relationship of commitment to turnover in recent hires and tenured employees.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1984;69:687-690.