Analysis of nephric duct specification in the avian embryo

Development (Cambridge)

Volumn 139, Issue 22, 2012, Pages 4143-4151

  Attia, Lital ^a   Yelin, Ronit ^a   Schultheiss, Thomas M ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cell type specification; Chick embryo; Hox genes; Kidney; Mesoderm patterning; Nephric duct

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; CHICK EMBRYO; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EVOLUTION; GENE EXPRESSION; HOX GENE; HOXA6 GENE; HOXB4 GENE; KIDNEY CELL; KIDNEY COLLECTING TUBULE; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; MESODERM; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUAIL; SOMITE; TISSUE DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; BODY PATTERNING; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHICK EMBRYO; CHICKENS; CHIMERA; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; KIDNEY; MESODERM; NEPHRONS; PRIMITIVE STREAK; QUAIL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 84867865922     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: 14779129     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.085258     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Barak, H., Rosenfelder, L., Schultheiss, T. M. and Reshef, R. (2005). Cell fate specification along the anterior-posterior axis of the intermediate mesoderm. Dev. Dyn. 232, 901-914.
2. Brennan, H. C., Nijjar, S. and Jones, E. A. (1998). The specification of the pronephric tubules and duct in Xenopus laevis. Mech. Dev. 75, 127-137.
3. Burke, A. C., Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A. and Tabin, C. (1995). Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333-346.
4. Burrill, J. D., Moran, L., Goulding, M. D. and Saueressig, H. (1997). PAX2 is expressed in multiple spinal cord interneurons, including a population of EN1+ interneurons that require PAX6 for their development. Development 124, 4493-4503.
5. Carapuço, M., Nóvoa, A., Bobola, N. and Mallo, M. (2005). Hox genes specify vertebral types in the presomitic mesoderm. Genes Dev. 19, 2116-2121.
6. Chisaka, O. and Capecchi, M. R. (1991). Regionally restricted developmental defects resulting from targeted disruption of the mouse homeobox gene hox-1.5. Nature 350, 473-479.
7. Dean, B. (1899). On the embryology of bdellostoma stouti. Verlag von Gustav Fischer in Jena, pp. 221-276.
8. Dressler, G. R., Deutsch, U., Chowdhury, K., Nornes, H. O. and Gruss, P. (1990). Pax2, a new murine paired-box-containing gene and its expression in the developing excretory system. Development 109, 787-795.
9. Ema, M., Morita, M., Ikawa, S., Tanaka, M., Matsuda, Y., Gotoh, O., Saijoh, Y., Fujii, H., Hamada, H., Kikuchi, Y. et al. (1996). Two new members of the murine Sim gene family are transcriptional repressors and show different expression patterns during mouse embryogenesis. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16, 5865-5875.
10. Fan, C. M., Kuwana, E., Bulfone, A., Fletcher, C. F., Copeland, N. G., Jenkins, N. A., Crews, S., Martinez, S., Puelles, L., Rubenstein, J. L. et al. (1996). Expression patterns of two murine homologs of Drosophila single-minded suggest possible roles in embryonic patterning and in the pathogenesis of Down syndrome. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 7, 1-16.
11. García-Bellido, A. (1975). Genetic control of wing disc development in Drosophila. Ciba Found. Symp. 0, 161-182.
12. Garcia-Martinez, V. and Schoenwolf, G. C. (1992). Positional control of mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev. Dyn. 193, 249-256.
13. Graham, A., Papalopulu, N. and Krumlauf, R. (1989). The murine and Drosophila homeobox gene complexes have common features of organization and expression. Cell 57, 367-378.
14. Grobstein, C. (1955). Inductive interactions in the devlopment of the mouse metanephros. J. Exp. Zool. 130, 319-339.
15. Gruenwald, P. (1943). Stimulation of nephrogenic tissue by normal and abnormal inductors. Anat. Rec. 86, 321-339.
16. Hamburger, V. and Hamilton, H. L. (1951). A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. J. Morphol. 88, 49-92.
17. Iimura, T. and Pourquié, O. (2006). Collinear activation of Hoxb genes during gastrulation is linked to mesoderm cell ingression. Nature 442, 568-571.
18. James, R. G. and Schultheiss, T. M. (2003). Patterning of the avian intermediate mesoderm by lateral plate and axial tissues. Dev. Biol. 253, 109-124.
19. James, R. G. and Schultheiss, T. M. (2005). Bmp signaling promotes intermediate mesoderm gene expression in a dose-dependent, cell-autonomous and translation-dependent manner. Dev. Biol. 288, 113-125.
20. Kessel, M. and Gruss, P. (1990). Murine developmental control genes. Science 249, 374-379.
21. Kessel, M., Balling, R. and Gruss, P. (1990). Variations of cervical vertebrae after expression of a Hox-1.1 transgene in mice. Cell 61, 301-308.
22. Kieny, M., Mauger, A. and Sengel, P. (1972). Early regionalization of somatic mesoderm as studied by the development of axial skeleton of the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 28, 142-161.
23. Krumlauf, R. (1994). Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78, 191-201.
24. Lynch, K. and Fraser, S. E. (1990). Cell migration in the formation of the pronephric duct in Xenopus laevis. Dev. Biol. 142, 283-292.
25. McGinnis, W. and Krumlauf, R. (1992). Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68, 283-302.
26. McIntyre, D. C., Rakshit, S., Yallowitz, A. R., Loken, L., Jeannotte, L., Capecchi, M. R. and Wellik, D. M. (2007). Hox patterning of the vertebrate rib cage. Development 134, 2981-2989.
27. McLaughlin, K. A., Rones, M. S. and Mercola, M. (2000). Notch regulates cell fate in the developing pronephros. Dev. Biol. 227, 567-580.
28. Mugford, J. W., Sipilä, P., Kobayashi, A., Behringer, R. R. and McMahon, A. P. (2008). Hoxd11 specifies a program of metanephric kidney development within the intermediate mesoderm of the mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 319, 396-405.
29. Obara-Ishihara, T., Kuhlman, J., Niswander, L. and Herzlinger, D. (1999). The surface ectoderm is essential for nephric duct formation in intermediate mesoderm. Development 126, 1103-1108.
30. Pachnis, V., Mankoo, B. and Costantini, F. (1993). Expression of the c-ret protooncogene during mouse embryogenesis. Development 119, 1005-1017.
31. Patterson, L. T. and Potter, S. S. (2003). Hox genes and kidney patterning. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 12, 19-23.
32. Pearson, J. C., Lemons, D. and McGinnis, W. (2005). Modulating Hox gene functions during animal body patterning. Nat. Rev. Genet. 6, 893-904.
33. Preger-Ben Noon, E., Barak, H., Guttmann-Raviv, N. and Reshef, R. (2009). Interplay between activin and Hox genes determines the formation of the kidney morphogenetic field. Development 136, 1995-2004.
34. Psychoyos, D. and Stern, C. D. (1996). Fates and migratory routes of primitive streak cells in the chick embryo. Development 122, 1523-1534.
35. Saxen, L. (1987). Organogenesis of the Kidney. London: Cambridge University Press.
36. Schoenwolf, G. C., Garcia-Martinez, V. and Dias, M. S. (1992). Mesoderm movement and fate during avian gastrulation and neurulation. Dev. Dyn. 193, 235-248.
37. Schuchardt, A., D'Agati, V., Larsson-Blomberg, L., Costantini, F. and Pachnis, V. (1994). Defects in the kidney and enteric nervous system of mice lacking the tyrosine kinase receptor Ret. Nature 367, 380-383.
38. Schuchardt, A., Srinivas, S., Pachnis, V. and Costantini, F. (1995). Isolation and characterization of a chicken homolog of the c-ret proto-oncogene. Oncogene 10, 641-649.
39. Schultheiss, T. M. (2007). Topics in vertebrate kidney formation: a comparative perspective. In Principles of Developmental Genetics (ed. S. Moody), pp. 778-804. San Diego: Academic Press.
40. Schultheiss, T. M., Xydas, S. and Lassar, A. B. (1995). Induction of avian cardiac myogenesis by anterior endoderm. Development 121, 4203-4214.
41. Schultheiss, T. M., James, R. G., Listopadova, A. and Herzlinger, D. (2003). Formation of the nephric duct. In The Kidney, (ed. P. Vize, A. S. Woolf and J. B. L. Bard). Amsterdam: Academic Press.
42. Serluca, F. C. and Fishman, M. C. (2001). Pre-pattern in the pronephric kidney field of zebrafish. Development 128, 2233-2241.
43. Slack, J. M. W. (1991). From Egg to Embryo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Swartz, M. E., Eberhart, J., Pasquale, E. B. and Krull, C. E. (2001). EphA4/ephrin-A5 interactions in muscle precursor cell migration in the avian forelimb. Development 128, 4669-4680.
45. Taira, M., Otani, H., Jamrich, M. and Dawid, I. B. (1994). Expression of the LIM class homeobox gene Xlim-1 in pronephros and CNS cell lineages of Xenopus embryos is affected by retinoic acid and exogastrulation. Development 120, 1525-1536.
46. Tonegawa, A., Funayama, N., Ueno, N. and Takahashi, Y. (1997). Mesodermal subdivision along the mediolateral axis in chicken controlled by different concentrations of BMP-4. Development 124, 1975-1984.
47. Torrey, T. (1965). Morphogenesis of the vertebrate kidney. In Organogenesis (ed. R. DeHaan and H. Ursprung), pp. 559-579. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
48. Tsuchida, T., Ensini, M., Morton, S. B., Baldassare, M., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M. and Pfaff, S. L. (1994). Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes. Cell 79, 957-970.
49. Vize, P. D., Woolf, A. S. and Bard, J. B. L. (2003). The Kidney, from Normal Development to Congenital Disease. San Diego: Academic Press.
50. Wacker, S. A., Jansen, H. J., McNulty, C. L., Houtzager, E. and Durston, A. J. (2004). Timed interactions between the Hox expressing non-organiser mesoderm and the Spemann organiser generate positional information during vertebrate gastrulation. Dev. Biol. 268, 207-219.
51. Waddington, C. H. (1938). The morphogenetic function of a vestigal organ in the chick. J. Exp. Biol. 15, 371-377.
52. Wellik, D. M. (2009). Hox genes and vertebrate axial pattern. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 88, 257-278.
53. Wellik, D. M. (2011). Hox genes and kidney development. Pediatr. Nephrol. 26, 1559-1565.
54. Wellik, D. M., Hawkes, P. J. and Capecchi, M. R. (2002). Hox11 paralogous genes are essential for metanephric kidney induction. Genes Dev. 16, 1423-1432.
55. Wilkinson, D. G. and Nieto, M. A. (1993). Detection of messenger RNA by in situ hybridization to tissue sections and whole mounts. Methods Enzymol. 225, 361-373.
56. Wilm, B., James, R. G., Schultheiss, T. M. and Hogan, B. L. (2004). The forkhead genes, Foxc1 and Foxc2, regulate paraxial versus intermediate mesoderm cell fate. Dev. Biol. 271, 176-189.
57. Zhao, Y. and Potter, S. S. (2002). Functional comparison of the Hoxa 4, Hoxa 10, and Hoxa 11 homeoboxes. Dev. Biol. 244, 21-36.