Hox patterning of the vertebrate rib cage

Development

Volumn 134, Issue 16, 2007, Pages 2981-2989

  McIntyre, Daniel C ^a   Rakshit, Sabita ^a   Yallowitz, Alisha R ^b   Loken, Luke ^a   Jeannotte, Lucie ^c   Capecchi, Mario R ^d   Willik, Deneen M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Anteroposterior (AP) patterning; Developmental genetics; Hox code; Posterior prevalence; Primaxial abaxial; Vertebral column

Indexed keywords

HOX PROTEIN; MUTANT PROTEIN;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BONE DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO PATTERN FORMATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC CODE; MESODERM; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PARALOGY; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; SOMITE; STERNUM; THORAX; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BODY PATTERNING; BONE AND BONES; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, DEVELOPMENTAL; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; MICE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RIBS; TISSUE DISTRIBUTION; VERTEBRATES;

VERTEBRATA;

EID: 34548546564     PISSN: 09501991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1242/dev.007567     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bachiller, D., Macias, A., Duboule, D. and Morata, G. (1994). Conservation of a functional hierarchy between mammalian and insect Hox/ HOM genes. EMBO J. 13, 1930-1941.
2. Boulet A. M. and Capecchi, M. R. (1996). Targeted disruption of hoxc-4 causes esophageal defects and vertebral transformations. Dev. Biol. 177, 232-249.
3. Burke, A. C. and Nowicki, J. L. (2003). A new view of patterning domains in the vertebrate mesoderm. Dev. Cell 4, 159-165.
4. Burke, A. C., Nelson, C. E., Morgan, B. A. and Tabin, C. (1995). Hox genes and the evolution of vertebrate axial morphology. Development 121, 333-346.
5. Chen, F. and Capecchi, M. R. (1997). Targeted mutations in hoxa-9 and hoxb-9 reveal synergistic interactions. Dev. Biol. 181, 186-196.
6. Chen, F. and Capecchi, M. R. (1999). Paralogous mouse Hox genes, Hoxa9, Hoxb9, and Hoxd9, function together to control development of the mammary gland in response to pregnancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 541-546.
7. Chen, F., Greer, J. and Capecchi, M. R. (1998). Analysis of Hoxa7/Hoxb7 mutants suggests periodicity in the generation of the different sets of vertebrae. Mech. Dev, 77, 49-57.
8. Colberg-Poley, A. M., Voss, S. D., Chowdhury K., Stewart, C. L., Wagner, E. F. and Gruss, P. (1985). Clustered homeo boxes are differentially expressed during murine development. Cell 43, 39-45.
9. Davis, A. P., Witte, D. P., Hsieh-Li, H. M., Potter, S. S. and Capecchi, M. R. (1995). Absence of radius and ulna in mice lacking hoxa- 11 and hoxd- 11. Nature 375, 791-795.
10. Duboule, D. (11991). Patterning in the vertebrate limb. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1, 211-216.
11. Duboule, D. and Dolle, P. (1989). The structural and functional organization of the murine HOX gene family resembles that of Drosophila homeotic genes. EMBO J. 8, 1497-1505.
12. Duboule, D. and Morata, G. (1994). Colinearity and functional hierarchy among genes of the homeotic complexes. Trends Genet. 10, 358-364.
13. Ersellus, J. R., Goulding, M. D. and Gruss, P. (1990). Structure and expression pattern of the murine Hox-3.2 gene. Development 110, 629-642.
14. Garcia-Gasca, A. and Spyropoulos, D. D. (2000). Differential mammary morphogenesis along the anteroposterior axis in Hoxc:6 gene targeted mice. Dev. Dyn. 219, 261-276.
15. Gaunt, S. J., Coletta, P. L, Pravtcheva, D. and Sharpe, P. T. (1990). Mouse Hox-3.4: homeobox sequence and embryonic expression patterns compared with other members of the Hox gene network. Development 109, 329-339.
16. Greer, J., Puetz, J., Thomas, K. R. and Capecchi, M. R. (2000). Maintenance of functional equivalence during paralogous Hox gene evolution. Nature 403, 661-665.
17. Gruss, P. and Kessel, M. (11991). Axial specification in higher vertebrates. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 1, 204-210.
18. Horan, G. S. B., Ramirez-Solis, R., Featherstone, M. S., Wolgemuth, D. J., Bradley, A. and Behringer, R. R. (11995). Compound mutants for the paralogous hoxa-4, hoxb-4, and hoxd-4 genes show more complete homeotic transformations and a dose-dependent increase in the number of vertebrae transformed. Genes Dev. 9, 1667-1677.
19. Huppert, S. S., Ilagan, M. X., De Strooper, B. and Kopan, R. (2005). Analysis of Notch function in presomitic mesoderm suggests a gamma-secretase-independent role for presinilins in somite differentiation. Dev. Cell 8, 677-688.
20. Izpisua-Belmonte, J. C., Falkenstein, H., Dolle, P., Renucci, A. and Duboule, D. (1991). Murine genes related to the Drosophila AbdB homeotic genes are sequentially expressed during development of the posterior part of the body. EMBO J. 10, 2279-2289.
21. Jeannotte, L., Lemieux, M., Charron, J., Poirier, F. and Robertson, E. J. (1993). Specification of axial identity in the mouse: role of the Hoxa-5 (Hox1.3) gene. Genes Dev. 7, 2085-2096.
22. Kessel, M. and Gruss, P. (1990). Murine developmental control genes. Science 249, 374-379.
23. Kessel, M. and Gruss, P (1991). Homeotic transformations of murine vertebrae and concomitant alteration of the Hox code induced by retinoic acid. Cell 67, 89-104.
24. Kmita, M. and Duboule, D. (2003). Organizing axes in time and space; 25 years of colinear tinkering. Science 301, 331-333.
25. Kostic, D. and Capecchi, M. R. (1994). Targeted disruptions of the murine Hoxa-4 and Hoxa-6 genes result in homeotic transformations of components of the vertebral column. Mech. Dev. 46, 231-247.
26. Lewis, E. B. (11963). Genes and developmental pathways. Am. Zool. 3, 33-56.
27. Lewis, E. B. (1978). A gene complex controlling segmentation in Drosophila. Nature 276, 565-570.
28. Nowicki, J. L. and Burke, A. C. (2000). Hox genes and morphological identity: axial patterning versus lateral patterning in the vertebrate mesoderm. Development 127, 4265-4275.
29. Nowicki, J. L, Takimoto, R. and Burke, A. C. (2003). The lateral somitic frontier: dorso-ventral aspects of anterio-posterior regionalization in avian embryos. Mech. Dev. 120, 227-240.
30. Patterson, L. T., Pembaur, M. and Potter, S. S. (2001). Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 regulate branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud in the developing kidney. Development 128, 2153-2161.
31. Rancourt, D. E., Tsuzuki, T and Capecchi, M. R. (1995). Genetic interaction between hoxb-5 and hoxb-6 is revealed by nonallelic noncomplementation. Genes Dev. 9, 108-122.
32. Rossel, M. and Capecchi, M. R. (1999). Mice mutant for both Hoxa 1 and Hoxb 1 show extensive remodeling of the hindbrain and defects in craniofacial development. Development 126, 5027-5040.
33. Toth, L E., Slawin, K. L., Pintar, J. E. and Nguyen-Huu, M. C. (1987). Region-specific expression of mouse homeobox genes in the embryonic mesoderm and central nervous system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84, 6790-6794.
34. van den Akker, E., Fromental-Ramain, C., de Graaff, W., Mouellic, H. L., Brulet P., Chambon, P. and Deschamps, J. (2001). Axial skeletal patterning in mice lacking all paralogous group 8 Hox genes. Development 128, 1911-1921.
35. Wahba, G. M., Hostikka, S. L. and Carpenter, E. M. (2001). The paralogous Hox Genes Hoxa10 and Hoxd10 interact to pattern the mouse hindlimb peripheral nervous system and skeleton. Dev. Biol. 231, 87-102.
36. Wellik, D. M. and Capecchi, M. R. (2003). Hox10 and Hox11 genes are required to globally pattern the mammalian skeleton. Science 301, 363-366.
37. Wellik, D. M., Hawkes, P. J. and Capecchi, M. R. (2002). Hox11 paralogous genes are essential for metanephric kidney induction. Genes Dev. 16, 1423-1432.