Process-oriented assessment of reading skills in primary school children;Prozessbezogene Diagnostik von Lesefähigkeiten bei Grundschulkindern

Zeitschrift fur Padagogische Psychologie

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 313-331

  Richter, Tobias ^a   Isberner, Maj Britt ^a   Naumann, Johannes ^b   Kutzner, Yvonne ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KASSEL   (Germany)

^b GERMAN INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cognitive processes; Primary school children; Reading skills; Sentence comprehension; Text comprehension; Word recognition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867831765     PISSN: 10100652     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000079     Document Type: Review

References (84)

1. Andrews, S. (1982). Phonological recoding: Is the regularity effect consistent? Memory and Cognition, 10, 565-575. doi:10.3758/BF03202439
2. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood size effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802-814. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.5.802
3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R. & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia. PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
4. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D. & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 283-316. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283 (Pubitemid 38707135)
5. Cattell, R. B., Weiß, R. H. & Osterland, J. (1997). Grundintelligenztest Skala 1 (5., überarb. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
6. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G. & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204-256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 (Pubitemid 33604132)
8. Cunningham, A. E. & Stanovich, K. E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733-740. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.733
9. Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 36-45. (Pubitemid 13243123)
10. Frazier, L. (1987). Sentence processing: A tutorial review. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, Vol. 12 (pp. 559-586). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.
11. Frisson, S., Rayner, K. & Pickering, M.J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 862-877. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.862 (Pubitemid 41677495)
12. Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 36, 69-81. doi:10.1007/BF02648022
13. Frith, U., Wimmer, H. & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German-and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31-54. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0201-2
14. Garrod, S. C. & Sanford, A. J. (1990). Referential processes in reading: Focusing on roles and individuals. In G.B. Flores d'Arcais, K. Rayner & D. Balota (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 515-533). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Gernsbacher, M. A. & Faust, M. E. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of general comprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 245-262. doi:10.1037/0278- 7393.17.2.245
16. Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition, 68, 1-76. (Pubitemid 128424124)
17. Gough, P. B. & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
18. Graesser, A. C., Hoffman, N. L. & Clark, L. F. (1980). Structural components of reading time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 135-151.
19. Hale, A. D., Henning, J. B., Hawkins, R. O., Sheeley, W., Shoemaker, L., Reynolds, J. R. et al. (2011). Reading assessment methods for middle-school students: An investigation of read ing comprehension rate and Maze accurate response rate. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 28-36. doi:10.1002/pits.20544
20. Hannon, B. & Daneman, B. (2004). Shallow semantic processing of text: An individual-differences account. Discourse Processes, 37, 187-204. doi:10.1207/s15326950dp3703-1
21. Hau, K. T. & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modelling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychology, 57, 327-351. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2004.tb00142.x (Pubitemid 39532708)
22. Haviland, S. E. & Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process of comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512-521. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80003-4
23. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65-70.
24. Horn, J. L. & McArdle, J. J. (1992). A practical and theoretical guide to measurement invariance in aging research. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 117-144. doi: 10.1080/03610739208253916
25. Hornberg, S., Valtin, R., Potthoff, B., Schwippert, K. & Schulz-Zander, R. (2007). Lesekompetenzen von Mädchen und Jungen im internationalen Vergleich. In W. Bos, S. Hornberg, K.-H. Arnold, G. Faust, L. Fried, E.-M. Lankes, K. Schwippert & R. Valtin (Hrsg.), IGLU 2006: Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich (S. 195-224). Münster: Waxmann.
26. Huntsman, L. A. & Lima, S. D. (2002). Orthographic neighbors and visual word recognition. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 31, 289-306. doi:10.1023/A:1015544213366 (Pubitemid 41462086)
27. Jensen, A. R. (1993). Why is reaction time correlated with psychometric g? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 53-56. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770697
28. Jensen, A. R. (2006). Clocking the mind: Mental chronometry and individual differences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
29. Jensen, A. R., Larson, J. & Paul, S. M. (1988). Psychometric g and mental processing speed on a semantic verification test. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 243-255.
30. Jöreskog, K. G. & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
31. Karing, C., Matthäi, J. & Artelt, C. (2011). Genauigkeit von Lehrerurteilen über die Lesekompetenz ihrer Schülerinnen und Schüler in der Sekundarstufe I-Eine Frage der Spezifität? Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 25, 159-172. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/ a000041
32. Kintsch, W. & Keenan, J. (1973). Reading rate and retention as a function of the number of propositions in the base structure of sentences. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 257-274. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90036-4
33. Küspert, P. & Schneider, W. (1998). Würzburger Leise Leseprobe. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
34. Lehrl, S. & Fischer, B. (1988). The basic parameters of human information processing: Their role in the determination of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 883-896.
35. Lenhard, W. & Schneider, W. (2006). ELFE 1-6: Ein Leseverständnistest für Erst-bis Sechstklässer. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
36. Lenhard, W. & Schneider, W. (Hrsg.) (2009). Diagnostik und Förderung des Leseverständnisses. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
37. Lorenz, C. & Artelt, C. (2009). Fachspezifität und Stabilität diagnostischer Kompetenz von Grundschullehrkräften in den Fächern Deutsch und Mathematik. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 211-222. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652.23.34.211
38. Mayring, H. & Wimmer, H. (2003). Salzburger Lese-Screening für die Klassenstufen 1-4. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
39. McRae, K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J. & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Modeling the influence of thematic fit (and other constraints) in on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 283-312. doi:10.1006/jmla. 1997.2543 (Pubitemid 128347311)
40. Murray, J. D. & Burke, K. A. (2003). Activation and encoding of predictive inferences: The role of reading skill. Discourse Processes, 35, 81-102. doi:10.1207/S15326950DP3502-1
41. Müller, B., Richter, T., Kriẑan, A., Hecht, T., & Ennemoser, M. (2012). Evidenzbasierte Leseförderung: Vorstellung einer Interventionsstudie. Diskurs Kindheits-und Jugendforschung, 7, 213-220.
42. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2006). MPlus user's guide (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
43. Nation, K. & Snowling, M.J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word-recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85-101. doi:10.1006/jmla.1998.2564 (Pubitemid 128346447)
44. Naumann, J., Artelt, C., Schneider, W. & Stanat, P. (2010). Lesekompetenz von PISA 2000 bis PISA 2009. In E. Klieme, C. Artelt, J. Hartig, N. Jude, O. Köller, M. Prenzel, W. Schneider & P. Stanat (Hrsg.). PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt (S. 23-71). Münster: Waxmann.
45. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U. & Groeben, N. (2008). Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy training in learning from hypertext. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 197-213. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.08.007
46. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Flender, J., Christmann, U. & Groeben, N. (2007). Signaling in expository hypertexts compensates for deficits in reading skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 791-807. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663. 99.4.791
47. Newell, A. & Rosenbloom, P. (1981). Mechanisms of skill acquisition and the law of practice. In J.R. Anderson (Ed), Cognitive skills and their acquisition (pp. 1-55) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K. & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468. doi:10.1080/01690960344000008 (Pubitemid 37038286)
49. Paap, K. R. & Noel, R. W. (1991). Dual route models of print to sound: Still a good horse race. Psychological Research, 53, 13-24.
50. Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Academic Press.
51. Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167-208). Oxford University Press.
52. Perfetti, C. A. & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189-213). Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
53. Pickering, M. J. & Garrod, S. (2007). Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 105-110. doi:0.1016/j. tics.2006.12.002 (Pubitemid 46282520)
54. Pickering, M. J. & van Gompel, R. P. G. (2006). Syntactic pars ing. In M. J. Traxler & M.A. Gernsbacher (Eds.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (2nd ed., pp. 455-503). London: Academic Press.
55. Projekt Deutscher Wortschatz (2007). Deutscher Wortschatz-Portal [Internet-Datenbank]. Verfügbar unter http://corpora. uni-leipzig.de/ (Zugriff am 20.09.2011)
56. Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.510
57. Richter, T. & Christmann, U. (2009). Lesekompetenz: Prozessebenen und interindividuelle Unterschiede. In N. Groeben & B. Hurrelmann (Hrsg.), Lesekompetenz: Bedingungen, Dimensionen, Funktionen (3. Aufl., S. 25-58). Weinheim: Juventa.
58. Richter, T. & Naumann, J. (2009). Was misst der ELVES-Subtest Satzverifikation? Analysen von Mess-und Itemeigenschaften mit hierarchisch-linearen Modellen. In W. Schneider, H. Marx & W. Lenhard (Hrsg.), Diagnose und Förderung des Leseverständnisses (Tests und Trends, N. F. Bd. 7, S. 131-150). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
59. Richter, T. & van Holt, N. (2005). ELVES: Ein computergestütztes Diagnostikum zur Erfassung der Effizienz von Teilprozessen des Leseverstehens. Diagnostica, 51, 169-182. doi:10.1026/0012-1924.51.4.169 (Pubitemid 41634491)
60. Richter, T., Schroeder, S. & Wöhrmann, B. (2009). You don't have to believe everything you read: Background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 538-558. doi:10.1037/a0014038
61. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
62. Roskam, E. E. (1997). Models for speed and time-limited tests. In W. van der Linden & R. K. Hambleton (Hrsg.), Handbook of modern item response theory (S. 187-208). New York: Springer.
63. Rost, D.H. (1989). Reading comprehension: Skill or skills? Journal of Research in Reading, 12, 87-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.1989.tb00160.x
64. Rost, D.H. & Hartmann, A. (1992). Lesen, Hören, Verstehen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 200, 345-361.
65. Roth, E. (1964). Die Geschwindigkeit der Verarbeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 11, 616-622.
66. Sanders, T. J. M., Spooren, W. P. M. & Noordman, L. G. M. (1992). Towards a taxonomy of coherence relations. Discourse Processes, 15, 1-35. doi:10.1080/01638539209544800
67. Schneider, W., Schlagmüller, M. & Ennemoser, M. (2007). LGVT 6-12: Lesegeschwindigkeits-und verständnistest für die Klassen 6-12.
68. Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students' verbal ability and reading time on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 877-896. doi: 10.1037/a0023731
69. Singer, M. (1993). Causal bridging inferences: Validating consistent and inconsistent sequences. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 340-359. doi:10.1037/h0078825
70. Spearman, C. E. (1927). The abilities of man: Their nature and measurement. New York: Macmillan.
71. Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32-71. doi:10.2307/747348
72. Stanovich, K. E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the garden-variety poor reader: The phonological core variable difference model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 590-604. doi:10.1177/ 002221948802101003
73. Sticht, T. G. & James, J. H. (1984). Listening and reading. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 293-317). White Plains, NY: Longman.
74. Südkamp, A., Kaiser, J. & Möller, J. (2012, March 26). Accuracy of teachers' judgments of students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1037/a0027627
75. Thompson-Schill, S. L. & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (1999). Priming of visual and functional knowledge on a semantic classification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 41-53. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.25.1.41
76. Ulrich, R. & Miller, J. (1993). Information processing models generating lognormally distributed reaction times. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 37, 513-525.
77. van Dijk, T. A. & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
78. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J. & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 2-40. doi:10.1046/j.0021-9630.2003.00305.x (Pubitemid 38196253)
79. Venezky, R. (1979). Orthographic regularities in English words. In P. Kolers, M. Wolstrad & P. Bouma (Eds.), Processing of visual language (pp. 283-293). New York: Plenum Press.
80. Weiß, R. H. (2008). Grundintelligenztest Skala 2 Revision (CFT20-R). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
81. West, S. G., Finch, J. F. & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation modeling with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 37-55). Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage.
82. Wimmer, H. (1996). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Evidence from children learning to read German. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 80-90. doi:10.1006/jecp.1996.0004 (Pubitemid 126385030)
83. Wirtz, M. & Caspar, F. (2002). Beurteilerübereinstimmung und Beurteilerreliabilität. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
84. Zwaan, R. A. & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162-185. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162