Single nanoscale cluster species revealed by 1H NMR diffusion-ordered spectroscopy and small-angle X-ray scattering

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 51, Issue 44, 2012, Pages 10992-10996

  Oliveri, Anna F ^a   Carnes, Matthew E ^a   Baseman, Matthew M ^a   Richman, Erik K ^a   Hutchison, James E ^a   Johnson, Darren W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

cluster compounds; gallium; hydrates; NMR spectroscopy; small angle X ray scattering

Indexed keywords

DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE; GALLIUM; HYDRATES; HYDRATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; ORGANIC SOLVENTS; POLYMER BLENDS;

CLUSTER COMPOUNDS; DIMETHYL SULFOXIDE (DMSO); HYDRODYNAMIC RADIUS; MILLIMOLAR CONCENTRATIONS; NANO-SCALE CLUSTERS; NANOSCALE STRUCTURE; NMR DIFFUSION; POLAR SOLVENTS;

X RAY SCATTERING;

EID: 84867818771     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206386     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. P. Alivisatos, P. F. Barbara, A. W. Castleman, J. Chang, D. A. Dixon, M. L. Klein, G. L. McLendon, J. S. Miller, M. A. Ratner, P. J. Rossky, S. I. Stupp, M. E. Thompson, Adv. Mater. 1998, 10, 1297-1336.
2. T. M. Anderson, W. A. Neiwert, M. L. Kirk, P. M. B. Piccoli, J. Schultz, T. F. Koetzle, D. G. Musaev, K. Morokuma, R. Cao, C. L. Hill, Science 2004, 306, 2074-2077.
3. Q. Yin, J. M. Tan, C. Besson, Y. V. Geletii, D. G. Musaev, A. E. Kuznetsov, Z. Luo, K. I. Hardcastle, C. L. Hill, Science 2010, 328, 342-345.
4. M. W. Kanan, D. G. Nocera, Science 2008, 321, 1072-1075.
5. H. I. Karunadasa, C. J. Chang, J. R. Long, Nature 2010, 464, 1329-1333.
6. J. G. McAlpin, Y. Surendranath, M. Dinca, T. A. Stich, S. A. Stoian, W. H. Casey, D. G. Nocera, R. D. Britt, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6882-6883.
7. T. C. Stamatatos, S. J. Teat, W. Wernsdorfer, G. Christou, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 529-532
8. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 521-524.
9. S. Hill, R. S. Edwards, N. Aliaga-Alcalde, G. Christou, Science 2003, 302, 1015-8.
10. S. Schneider, A. Dzudza, G. Raudaschl-Sieber, T. J. Marks, J. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 2768-2779.
11. W. H. Casey, Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1-16.
12. Z. L. Mensinger, J. T. Gatlin, S. T. Meyers, L. N. Zakharov, D. A. Keszler, D. W. Johnson, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 9626-9628
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 9484-9486.
14. 13 has been previously reported and characterized in the solid state and bulk in:, E. Rather, J. T. Gatlin, P. G. Nixon, T. Tsukamoto, V. Kravtsov, D. W. Johnson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 3242-3243.
15. J. T. Gatlin, Z. L. Mensinger, L. N. Zakharov, D. Macinnes, D. W. Johnson, Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 1267-1269.
16. W. Wang, K. M. Wentz, S. E. Hayes, D. W. Johnson, D. A. Keszler, Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 9-11.
17. K. Jiang, J. T. Anderson, K. Hoshino, D. Li, J. F. Wager, D. A. Keszler, Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 945-952.
18. J. Ling, J. Qiu, G. E. Sigmon, M. Ward, J. E. S. Szymanowski, P. C. Burns, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 13395-13402.
19. G. N. Greaves, S. Sen, Adv. Phys. 2007, 56, 1-166.
20. B. Gilbert, G. Lu, C. S. Kim, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2007, 313, 152-159.
21. C. A. Ohlin, Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 262-270
22. C. P. Pradeep, F.-Y. Li, C. Lydon, H. N. Miras, D.-L. Long, L. Xu, L. Cronin, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7472-7479.
23. J. A. Potton, G. J. Daniell, B. D. Rainford, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 1988, 21, 663-668.
24. J. Ilacsky, P. R. Jemian, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 347-353.
25. J. W. Akitt, J. M. Elders, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1988, 1347-1355.
26. W. G. Jackson, J. A. McKeon, M. Zehnder, M. Neuberger, S. Fallab, Chem. Commun. 2004, 6, 2322-2323.
27. M. berg, J. Glaser, Inorg. Chim. Acta 1993, 206, 53-61.
28. J.-F. Lemonnier, S. Duval, S. Floquet, E. Cadot, Isr. J. Chem. 2011, 51, 290-302.
29. F. Périneau, S. Pensec, C. Sassoye, F. Ribot, L. van Lokeren, R. Willem, L. Bouteiller, C. Sanchez, L. Rozes, J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 4470-4475.
30. The relationship between rate of exchange and the diffusion period at which the DOSY data is collected can impact the diffusion coefficient of each exchangeable proton on the observed species. If a proton behaves more "clusterlike" over the diffusion time, the diffusion coefficient associated with the peak in question will be more clusterlike in character and hence shifted towards the peak in question (e.g., the cluster). If the proton is acting more "waterlike" the diffusion coefficient will shift closer to water. The degree of this shift depends on the rate of exchange. Protons on the cluster that are in faster exchange will appear to have larger diffusion coefficients, which causes a large spread in the measured cluster diffusion coefficents, and hence, hydrodynamic radii. For a detailed discussion in the context of the DOSY spectra of sucrose, see:, E. J. Cabrita, S. Berger, Magn. Reson. Chem. 2002, 40, S 122 -S 127.
31. Alternately, data refinement, processing, and peak overlap can result in a scattering of diffusion coefficients:, T. D. W. Claridge, High-Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry, 2 nd ed., Elsevier, Oxford, 2009, pp. 303-334. Methods for smoothing this artifact can be found in
32. R. C. O. Sebastião, C. N. Pacheco, J. P. Braga, D. J. Pilõ-Veloso, Mag. Res. 2006, 182, 22-28
33. 2O, was used as a reference for calibration
34. L. G. Longsworth, J. Phys. Chem. 1954, 58, 770.
35. M. E. Zielinski, K. F. Morris, Magn. Reson. Chem. 2009, 47, 53-56.
36. Z. L. Mensinger, M. K. Kamunde-Devonish, S. A. Betterton, M. M. Baseman, L. N. Zakharov, J. T. Gatlin, D. A. Keszler, D. W. Johnson, Preparation of a Series of Heteromentallic Aqueous Tridecameric Clusters. Manuscript in Progress.