Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: A prospective cohort study

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 262-268

  Kollen, Boudewijn J ^a   Kwakkel, Gert ^b,c   Lindeman, Eline ^b  

^a Research Bureau   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BARTHEL INDEX; CEREBRAL ARTERY DISEASE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STROKE;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GAIT; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMANS; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33645825584     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215506cr910oa     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Duncan PW, Lai SM, Tyler D, Perera S, Reker DM, Studenski S. Evaluation of proxy responses to the Stroke Impact Scale. Stroke 2002; 33: 2593-99.
2. Wandel A, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 736-38.
3. Olsen TS. Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1990; 21: 247-51.
4. Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H, Zorowitz R. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 218-23.
5. Herman B, Leyten AC, van Luijk JH, Frenken CW, Op de Coul AA, Schulte BP. Epidemiology of stroke in Tilburg, the Netherlands. The population-based stroke incidence register: 2. Incidence, initial clinical picture and medical care, and three-week case fatality. Stroke 1982; 13: 629-34.
6. Dutch Heart Foundation. Final Report. Tilburg, 1981.
7. Gresham GE, Fitzpatrick TE, Wolf PA, McNamara PM, Kannel WB, Dawber TR. Residual disability in survivors of stroke - the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 954-56.
8. Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain L, Izquierdo-Sanchez M, Fermoso-Garcia J. Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 464-75.
9. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1357-63.
10. Barer DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Ageing 1989; 18: 183-91.
11. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Prediction models for functional recovery of ADL, walking ability and dexterity of the paretic arm after a primary ischemic middle cerebral artery stroke. In Dynamics in functional recovery after stroke. Pons & Looijen, 1998.
12. Novack TA, Satterfield WT, Lyons K, Kolski G, Hackmeyer L, Connor M. Stroke onset and rehabilitation: time lag as a factor in treatment outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65: 316-19.
13. Suzuki K, Imada G, Iwaya T, Handa T, Kurogo H. Determinants and predictors of the maximum walking speed during computer-assisted gait training in hemiparetic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 179-82.
14. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 191-96.
15. Lindley RI, Warlow CP, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Slattery J, Sandercock PA. Interobserver reliability of a clinical classification of acute cerebral infarction. Stroke 1993; 24: 1801-804.
16. Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Lindley RI, Sellar RJ, Warlow CP. The validity of a simple clinical classification of acute ischaemic stroke. J Neurol 1996; 243: 274-79.
17. Anderson CS, Taylor BV, Hankey GJ, Stewart-Wynne EG, Jamrozik KD. Validation of a clinical classification for subtypes of acute cerebral infarction. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 1173-79.
18. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975; 12: 189-98.
19. Deelman D, Liebrand W, Koning-Haanstra, Burg W van de. SAN test. A aphasia test for language comprehension and linguistic usage. Construction and standards. Swets & Zeitlinger, 1981.
20. Lezak M. Neurophysiological assessment. Oxford University Press, 1995.
21. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35-40.
22. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR. Gait assessment for neurologically impaired patients. Standards for outcome assessment. Phys Ther 1986; 66: 1530-39.
23. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990; 12: 6-9.
24. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 1991; 337: 1521-26.
25. Kalra L, Crome P. The role of prognostic scores in targeting stroke rehabilitation in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993; 41: 396-400.