The mobility scale for acute stroke patients: Concurrent validity

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 558-564

  Simondson, Janine A ^a   Goldie, P ^a   Greenwood, K M ^a  

^a LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT MOBILITY; RATING SCALE; SCORING SYSTEM; SITTING; STANDING; STROKE; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 0042426030     PISSN: 02692155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1191/0269215503cr650oa     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mahoney F, Barthel D. Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index. Md State Med J 1965; 14: 61-65.
2. Hamilton B, Granger C, Sherwin F, Zielezny M, Tashman J. A uniform national data system for rehabilitation. In: Fuhrer M ed. Rehabilitation outcomes analysis and measurement. Baltimore: Paul Brooks Publishing Co, 1987: 137-47.
3. Carr J, Shepherd R, Nordholm L, Lynne D. Investigation of a new Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther 1985; 65: 175-80.
4. Lincoln N, Leadbitter D. Assessment of motor function in stroke patients. Physiotherapy 1979; 65: 48-50.
5. Harvey R, Jellinek H. Functional performance assessment: A program approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1981; 62: 456-61.
6. Gowland C, Stratford O, Ward M et al. Measuring physical impairment and disability with the Chedoke McMaster Stroke Assessment. Stroke 1993; 24: 58-63.
7. Bohannon R, Kloter K, Cooper J. Recovery and outcome of patients with stroke treated in an acute care hospital. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1991; 1: 190-95.
8. Roach K, Van Dillen L. Development of an Acute Care Index of Functional status for patients with neurological impairment. Phys Ther 1988; 68: 1102-108.
9. Simondson J, Goldie P, Brock K, Nosworthy J. The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: intra-rater and interrater reliability. Clin Rehabil 1996; 10: 295-300.
10. Streiner D, Norman G. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
11. Task Force On Standards for Measurement in Physical Therapy. Standards for tests and measurements in physical therapy practice. Phys Ther 1991; 71: 589-622.
12. Brock K, Robinson P, Simondson J, Goldie P, Nosworthy J, Greenwood K. Prediction of length of hospital stay following stroke. J Qual Clin Pract 1997; 17: 37-46.
13. Anastasi A. Psychological testing. New York: Macmillan, 1982.
14. Bennekom C, Jelles F, Lankhorst G, Bouter L. The Rehabilitation Activities Profile: a validation study of its use as a disability index with stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 501-507.
15. Gresham G, Phillips T, Labi M. ADL status in stroke: relative merits of three standard indexes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1980; 61: 355-58.
16. Kidd D, Stewart G, Baldry J et al. The Functional Independence Measure: a comparative validity and reliability study. Disabil Rehabil 1995; 17: 10-14.
17. Wade D, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177-82.
18. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams I Shapiro S. Examining outcome measures in a clinical study of stroke. Stroke 1990; 21: 731-39.
19. Fisher W, Harvey R, Taylor P, Kilgore K, Kelly C. Rehabits: a common language of functional assessment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 113-22.
20. Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, Durand A, Corriveau D. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 1206-202.
21. Poole J, Whitney S. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 195-97.
22. Holden M, Gill K, Magliozzi M, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired, reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984; 64: 35-40.
23. Dodds T, Martin D, Stolov W, Deyo R. A validation of the Functional Independence Measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 531-36.
24. Stineman M, Shea J, Jette A et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77: 1101-108.
25. Stineman M, Jette A, Fiedler R, Granger C. Impairment-specific dimensions within the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 636-43.