Predicting mobility outcome one year after stroke: A prospective cohort study

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 38, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 218-223

  Van De Port, Ingrid G L ^a,b   Kwakkel, Gert ^a,b   Schepers, Vera P M ^a,b   Lindeman, Eline ^a,b  

^a Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cerebrovascular disorders; Mobility; Prognosis; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONVALESCENCE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DISABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COGNITION; COHORT STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MUSCULOSKELETAL EQUILIBRIUM; PROGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33746206385     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16501970600582930     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Hacke W, Kaste M, Bogousslavsky J, Brainin M, Chamorro A, Lees K, et al. European Stroke Initiative Recommendations for Stroke Management - update 2003. Cerebrovasc Dis 2003; 16: 311-337.
2. Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Techniques for measurement and assessment of mobility in rehabilitation: a theoretical approach. Clin Rehabil 1998; 12: 455-464.
3. Chae J, Johnston M, Kim H, Zorowitz R. Admission motor impairment as a predictor of physical disability after stroke rehabilitation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 74: 218-223.
4. Duarte E, Marco E, Muniesa JM, Belmonte R, Diaz P, Tejero M, et al. Trunk control test as a functional predictor in stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2002; 34: 267-272.
5. Kelly PJ, Furie KL, Shafqat S, Rallis N, Chang Y, Stein J. Functional recovery following rehabilitation after hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 968-972.
6. Lin JH, Hsieh CL, Lo SK, Hsiao SF, Huang MH. Prediction of functional outcomes in stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. J Formos Med Assoc 2003; 102: 695-700.
7. Musicco M, Emberti L, Nappi G, Caltagirone C. Early and long-term outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation, and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 551-558.
8. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Bragoni M, Coiro P, De Angelis D, et al. Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation: a matched comparison. Stroke 2003; 34: 2861-2865.
9. Pettersen R, Dahl T, Wyller TB. Prediction of long-term functional outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil 2002; 16: 149-159.
10. Stineman MG, Maislin G, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. A prediction model for functional recovery in stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 550-556.
11. Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain L, Iz-quierdo-Sanchez M, Fermoso-Garcia J. Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 464-475.
12. Hellström K, Lindmark B, Wahlberg B, Fugl-Meyer AR. Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. J Rehabil Med 2003; 35: 202-207.
13. Wandel A, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 736-738.
14. Loewen SC, Anderson BA. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78-81.
15. Kwakkel G, Mulder FV, Ooms AC. Het prediceren van loopvaardigheid na een beroerte: een prospectief cohortonderzoek. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde 2004; 114: 2-8.
16. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Kollen BJ, Lankhorst GJ. Predicting disability in stroke-a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479-489.
17. Meijer R, Ihnenfeldt DS, de Groot IJ, van Limbeek J, Vermeulen M, de Haan RJ. Prognostic factors for ambulation and activities of daily living in the subacute phase after stroke. A systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil 2003; 17: 119-129.
18. Stroke-1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407-1431.
19. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, Bradshaw CM. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud 1991; 13: 50-54.
20. Hsieh CL, Hsueh IP, Mao HF Validity and responsiveness of the rivermead mobility index in stroke patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 2000; 32: 140-142.
21. Hsueh IP, Wang CH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. Comparison of psychometric properties of three mobility measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 1741-1745.
22. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.
23. Collin C, Wade DT, Davies S, Horne V The Barthel ADL Index: a reliability study. Int Disabil Stud 1988; 10: 61-63.
24. Collin C, Wade D. Assessing motor impairment after stroke: a pilot reliability study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1990; 53: 576-579.
25. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental State". A pratical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatrc Research 1975; 12: 189-198.
26. De-Renzi E, Vignolo LA. The Token Test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain 1962; 85: 665-678.
27. Pijfers EM, Vries LAd, Messing-Petersen H. The Utrecht Communication Observation (Het Utrechts Communicatie Onderzoek). Westervoort, Stichting Afasie Nederland; 1985.
28. Altman DG, Royston P. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Stat Med 2000; 19: 453-473.
29. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. New York: HarperCollins; 1996.
30. Belsey DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley and Sons; 1980.
31. Green J, Forster A, Young J. A test-retest reliability study of the Barthel Index, the Rivermead Mobility Index, the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living Scale and the Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil 2001; 23: 670-676.
32. Tsang YL, Mak MK. Sit-and-reach test can predict mobility of patients recovering from acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 94-98.
33. Paolucci S, Grasso MG, Antonucci G, Bragoni M, Troisi E, Morelli D, et al. Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: 1-year follow-up and prognostic factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 2-8.
34. Bode RK, Heinemann AW, Semik P, Mallinson T. Relative importance of rehabilitation therapy characteristics on functional outcomes for persons with stroke. Stroke 2004; 35: 2537-2542.
35. Kollen B, van de Port I, Lindeman E, Twisk J, Kwakkel G Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005; 36: 2676-2680.
36. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 480-484.