Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2003, Pages 433-440

  Tooth, Leigh R ^a   McKenna, Kryss T ^a   Smith, Melinda ^a,b   O'Rourke, Peter K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b CAIRNS BASE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMMUNITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DEMOGRAPHY; ERROR; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT MOBILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF CONCEPT; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STROKE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WORK;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FAMILY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUEENSLAND; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0037809399     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0963828031000069726     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Wade D, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. International Journal of Rehabilitative Medicine 1985; 7: 176-181.
2. Schuling J, de Haan R, Limburg M, Groenier K. The Frenchay Activities Index. Assessment of functional status in stroke patients. Stroke 1993; 24: 1173-1177.
3. Wood-Dauphinee S, Opzoomer A, Williams J, Marchand B, Spitzer W. Assessment of global function: the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988; 69: 583-590.
4. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams J. Reintegration to normal living as a proxy to quality of life. Journal of Chronic Diseases 1987; 40: 491-499.
5. Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J, Gordon W, Rempel R. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation 1993; 8: 75-79.
6. de Haan R, Aaronson N, Limburg M, Langton Hewer R, van Crevel H. Measuring quality of life in stroke. Stroke 1993; 24: 320-327.
7. Knapp P, Hewison J. Disagreement in patient and carer assessment of functional abilities after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 934-938.
8. Segal M, Schall R. Determining functional/health status and its relation to disability in stroke survivors. Stroke 1994; 25: 2391-2397.
9. Sneeuw K, Aaronson N, de Haan R, Limburg M. Assessing quality of life after stroke. The value and limitations of proxy ratings. Stroke 1997; 28: 1541-1549.
10. Wyller T, Sveen U, Bautz-Holter E. The Frenchay Activities Index in stroke patients: agreement between scores by patients and by relatives. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996; 18: 454-459.
11. Sprangers M, Aaronson N. The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: a review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1992; 45: 743-760.
12. Cusick C, Brooks C, Whiteneck G. The use of proxies in community integration research. Archives of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation 2001; 82: 1018-1024.
13. Magaziner J, Simonsick E, Kashner M, Hebel J. Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional status. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 1988; 41: 1065-1074.
14. Mayo N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Cote R et al. There's no place like home: An evaluation of early supported discharge for stroke. Stroke 2000; 31: 1016-1023.
15. Carter B, Ogilvy C, Candia G, Rosas D, Buonanno F. One-year outcome after decompressive surgery for massive nondominant hemispheric infarction. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 1168-1176.
16. Carter B, Buckley D, Ferraro R, Rordorf G, Ogilvy C. Factors associated with reintegration to normal living after subarachnoid haemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2000; 46: 1326-1334.
17. Bethoux F, Calmels P, Gautheron V. Changes in the quality of life of hemiplegic stroke patients with time: A preliminary report. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 78: 19-23.
18. Bethoux F, Calmels P, Gautheron V, Minaire P. Quality of life of the spouses of stroke patients: a preliminary study. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1996; 19: 291-299.
19. Chung R, Carter B, Norbash A et al. Management outcomes for ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in the elderly. Neurosurgery 2000; 47: 827-833.
20. Daverat P, Petit H, Kemoun G, Dartigues J, Barat M. The long term outcome in 149 patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 665-668.
21. Davis A, Devlin M, Griffin A, Wunder J, Bell R. Functional outcome in amputation versus limb sparing of patients with lower extremity sarcoma: A matched case-control study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1999; 80: 615-618.
22. Esmatjes E, Ricart M, Fernandez-Cruz L et al. Quality of life after successful pancreas-kidney transplantation. Clinical Transplantation 1994; 8: 75-78.
23. Friedland J, Dawson D. Function after motor vehicle accidents: A prospective study of mild head injury and posttraumatic stress. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 2001; 189: 426-434.
24. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Connecticut: Appleton & Lange Norwalk, 1993.
25. Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of the health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 64-68.
26. Hamilton B, Laughlin J, Fiedler R, Granger C. Interrater reliability of the seven-level Functional Independence Measure (FIM). Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1994; 26: 115-119.
27. Folstein M, Folstein S, McHugh P. "Mini-Mental State": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research 1975; 12: 189-198.
28. Tombaugh T, McIntyre N. The Mini-Mental State Examination: a comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatric Society 1992; 40: 922-935.
29. Cohen J. Statistical power for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. New York: Academic Press, 1988.
30. Dorman P, Waddell F, Slattery J, Dennis M, Sandercock P. Are proxy assessments of health status after stroke with the EuroQO1 questionnaire feasible, accurate, and unbiased. Stroke 1997; 28: 1883-1887.
31. Magaziner J, Zimmerman S, Gruber-Baldini A, Hebel J, Fox M. Proxy reporting in five areas of functional status. American Journal of Epidemiology 1997; 146: 418-428.
32. Shaw C, McColl E, Bond S. Functional abilities and continence: The use of proxy respondents in research involving older people. Quality of Life Research 2001; 9: 1117-1126.
33. Korner-Bitensky N, Wood-Dauphinee S, Siemiatycki J, Shapiro S, Becker R. Health-related information postdischarge: Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1994; 75: 1287-1296.
34. Price C, Curless R, Rodgers H. Can stroke patients use visual analogue scales? Stroke 1999; 30: 357-1361.