Note on naive bayes based on binary descriptors in cheminformatics

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 2494-2500

  Townsend, Joe A ^a   Glen, Robert C ^a   Mussa, Hamse Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CLASSIFIERS;

BENCHMARK DATA; CHEMINFORMATICS; DATA SET; DESCRIPTORS; INACTIVE COMPOUNDS; LINEAR CLASSIFIERS; NAIVE BAYES; NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIERS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT; ENZYME INHIBITOR;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SCIENCE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL AGENTS; ENZYME INHIBITORS; HUMANS; INFORMATICS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 84867812799     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci200303m     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Duda, R. O. and Hart, P. E. Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, 1 st ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd: New York, NY, 1973.
2. Good, I. J. The Estimation of Probabilities: An Essay on Modern Bayesian Methods, 1 st ed.; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1965.
3. Bishop, C. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, 1 st ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 2006.
4. Robertson, S. E.; Jones, K. S. J. Relevance weighting of search terms J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 1976, 27, 129-146
5. Lowe, R.; Mussa, H. Y.; Mitchell, J. D.; Glen, R. C. Classifying Molecules Using a Sparse Probabilistic Kernel Binary Classifier J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 1539-1544
6. Angelopoulos, N; Hadjiprocopis, A; Walkinshaw, M. D. Bayesian Model Averaging for Ligand Discovery J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1547-1557
7. Abdo, A.; Chen, B.; Mueller, C.; Salim, N.; Willett, P. Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Using Bayesian Networks J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1012-1020
8. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. New Fragment Weighting Scheme for the Bayesian Inference Network in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 25-32
9. Klon, A. E. Bayesian Modeling in Virtual High Throughput Screening Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 2009, 12, 469-483
10. Bender, A. Bayesian Methods in Virtual Screening and Chemical Biology Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 672, 175-196
11. Parzen, E. On estimation of a probability density function and mode Ann. Math. Stat. 1962, 33, 1065-1076
12. Fawcett, T. An introduction to ROC analysis Patt. Rec. Lett. 2006, 27, 861-874
13. Wilton, D. J.; Harrison, R. F.; Willett, P.; Delaney, J.; Lawson, K.; Mullier, G. Virtual screening using binary kernel discrimination: Analysis of pesticide data J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 471-477
14. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3256-3266
15. Nigsch, F.; Mitchell, J. B. O. How to winnow actives from inactives: Introducing Molecular Orthogonal Sparse Bigrams (MOSBs) and multi-class winnow J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2008, 48, 306-318
16. Cannon, E. O.; Amin, A.; Bender, A.; Sternberg, M. J. E.; Muggleton, S. H.; Glen, R. C.; Mitchell, J. B. O. Support vector inductive logic programming outperforms the naive Bayes classiïňA̧er and inductive logic programming for the classiïňA̧cation of bioactive chemical compounds J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2007, 21, 269-280
17. Durant, J. L.; Leland, B. A.; Henry, D. R.; Nourse, J. G. Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1273-1280
18. MOE (The Molecular Operating Environment), version 2009.10; Chemical Computing Group Inc.: Montreal, Canada H3A 2RT, 2009.
19. Aitchison, J.; Aitken, C. G. G. Multivariate binary discrimination by the kernel method Biometrika 1976, 63, 413-420
20. Mussa, H. Y. The Aitchison-Aitken discrete kernel function is after all a positive definite kernel. Statistics and Probability Letters (in revision).