Ligand-based virtual screening using bayesian networks

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1012-1020

  Abdo, Ammar ^a   Chen, Beining ^b   Mueller, Christoph ^b   Salim, Naomie ^a   Willett, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFERENCE ENGINES;

ACTIVE MOLECULES; ALTERNATIVE NETWORK; BAYESIAN INFERENCE NETWORK (BIN); SQUARE ROOTS; STRUCTURAL HOMOGENEITY; TANIMOTO COEFFICIENT; VIRTUAL SCREENING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRUG SCREENING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY;

BAYES THEOREM; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; LIGANDS; PROTEINS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77954043914     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci100090p     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Leach, A. R.; Gillet, V. J. An Introduction to Chemoinformatics; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003.
2. Leach, A. R.; Shoichet, B. K.; Peishoff, C. E. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 5851-5855
3. Lengauer, T.; Lemmen, C.; Rarey, M.; Zimmermann, M. Novel technologies for virtual screening Drug Discovery Today 2004, 9, 27-34
4. Sheridan, R. P.; Kearsley, S. K. Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods? Drug Discovery Today 2002, 7, 903-911
5. Johnson, M. A.; Maggiora, G. M. Concepts and Application of Molecular Similarity; John Wiley: New York, 1990.
6. Willett, P.; Barnard, J. M.; Downs, G. M. Chemical similarity searching J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 983-996
7. Nikolova, N.; Jaworska, J. Approaches to measure chemical similarity - A review QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 1006-1026
8. Bender, A.; Glen, R. C. Molecular similarity: A key technique in molecular informatics Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3204-3218
9. Maldonado, A.; Doucet, J.; Petitjean, M.; Fan, B.-T. Molecular similarity and diversity in chemoinformatics: From theory to applications Mol. Diversity 2006, 10, 39-79
10. Turtle, H.; Croft, W. B. In Inference Networks for Document Retrieval, Proceedings of the 13th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Brussels, Belgium, 1990; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, 1990; pp 1 - 24.
11. Ribeiro, B.; Muntz, R. In A Belief Network Model for IR, Proceedings of the 19th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Zurich, Switzerland, 1996; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, 1996; pp 253 - 260.
12. de Campos, L. M.; Fernández-Luna, J. M.; Huete, J. F. The BNR model: Foundations and performance of a Bayesian network-based retrieval model Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 2003, 34, 265-285
13. Willett, P., Textual and chemical information retrieval: different applications but similar algorithms. Inf. Research [Online] 2000, 5, paper 69. http://informationr.net/ir/5-2/paper69.html (accessed April 20, 2010).
14. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. In Inference Networks for Chemical Similarity Searching, Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, Phuket, Thailand, 20-22 December, 2008; IEEE Computer Society: Los Alamitos, CA, 2008; pp 408 - 412.
15. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. Similarity-based virtual screening with a Bayesian inference network ChemMedChem. 2009, 4, 210-218
16. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. In Molecular Similarity Searching Using Inference Network, Proceeding of the 237th ACS National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Salt Lake City, UT, 22-26 March, 2009; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2009.
17. Symyx Technologies. MDL Drug Data Report. http://www.symyx.com/products/ databases/bioactivity/mddr/index.jsp (accessed April 20, 2010).
18. Chen, B.; Mueller, C.; Willett, P., Evaluation of a Bayesian inference network for ligand-based virtual screening. J. Cheminf. 2009, 1, DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-1-5. http://www.jcheminf.com/content/1/1/5 (accessed April 20, 2010).
19. Sunset Molecular Discovery. World of Molecular Bioactivity. http://www.sunsetmolecular.com/ (accessed April 20, 2010).
20. Turtle, H.; Croft, W. B. Evaluation of an inference network-based retrieval model ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1991, 9, 187-222
21. Greiff, W. R.; Croft, W. B.; Turtle, H. PIC matrices: A computationally tractable class of probabilistic query operators ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1999, 17, 367-405
22. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. Similarity-based virtual screening using bayesian inference network: Enhanced search using 2D fingerprints and multiple reference structures QSAR Comb. Sci. 2009, 28, 654-663
23. Arif, S.; Holliday, J.; Willett, P. Analysis and use of fragment-occurrence data in similarity-based virtual screening J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2009, 23, 655-668
24. Pipeline Pilot; Accelrys Software Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2008.
25. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 462-470
26. Gardiner, E. J.; Gillet, V. J.; Haranczyk, M.; Hert, J.; Holliday, J. D.; Malim, N.; Patel, Y.; Willett, P. Turbo similarity searching: effect of fingerprint and dataset on virtual-screening performance Stat. Anal. Data Mining. 2009, 2, 103-114
27. Rohrer, S. G.; Baumann, K. Maximum unbiased validation (MUV) data sets for virtual screening based on Pubchem bioactivity data J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 169-184
28. Siegel, S.; Castellan, N. J. Nonparametric Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.
29. Sheridan, R. P. Chemical similarity searches: When is complexity justified Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2007, 2, 423-430