|
Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 269-280
|
Support vector inductive logic programming outperforms the Naive Bayes Classifier and inductive logic programming for the classification of bioactive chemical compounds
|
Author keywords
Classification; Feature selection; Machine learning; Molecular similarity; Screening
|
Indexed keywords
BENCHMARKING;
CLASSIFIERS;
COMPUTER CIRCUITS;
FEATURE SELECTION;
INDUCTIVE LOGIC PROGRAMMING (ILP);
LEARNING SYSTEMS;
BAYES CLASSIFIER;
F MEASURE;
FEATURES SELECTION;
INDUCTIVE LOGIC;
LOGIC-PROGRAMMING;
MACHINE-LEARNING;
MOLECULAR SIMILARITY;
NAIVE BAYES CLASSIFIERS;
PERFORMANCE;
SUPPORT VECTOR;
CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);
ANGIOTENSIN RECEPTOR ANTAGONIST;
DOPAMINE 2 RECEPTOR BLOCKING AGENT;
PROSTAGLANDIN SYNTHASE INHIBITOR;
PROTEIN KINASE C INHIBITOR;
PROTEINASE INHIBITOR;
RENIN INHIBITOR;
SEROTONIN 1A AGONIST;
SEROTONIN 3 ANTAGONIST;
SEROTONIN UPTAKE INHIBITOR;
SUBSTANCE P ANTAGONIST;
THROMBIN INHIBITOR;
ACCURACY;
AREA UNDER THE CURVE;
ARTICLE;
BAYES THEOREM;
COMPUTER PROGRAM;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CORRELATION COEFFICIENT;
DRUG CLASSIFICATION;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS;
MCNEMAR TEST;
PREDICTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
QUALITY CONTROL;
RECALL;
RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;
STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;
STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;
SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;
|
EID: 34247386376
PISSN: 0920654X
EISSN: 15734951
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1007/s10822-007-9113-3 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (49)
|
References (41)
|