New fragment weighting scheme for the Bayesian inference network in ligand-based virtual screening

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 25-32

  Abdo, Ammar ^a,b   Salim, Naomie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b HODEIDAH UNIVERSITY   (Yemen)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; INFERENCE ENGINES; MOLECULES; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS;

BAYESIAN INFERENCE NETWORK (BIN); BAYESIAN INFERENCE NETWORKS; CONDITIONAL PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; MOLECULAR FRAGMENTS; PROBABILISTIC INFERENCE; VIRTUAL SCREENING; WEIGHTING FUNCTIONS; WEIGHTING SCHEME;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

LIGAND;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DRUG SCREENING; FACTUAL DATABASE; METHODOLOGY;

BAYES THEOREM; DATABASES, FACTUAL; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; LIGANDS; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 79952614063     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci100232h     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Eckert, H.; Bajorath, J. Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches. Drug Discovery Today 2007, 12, 225-233.
2. Geppert, H.; Vogt, M.; Bajorath, J. Current Trends in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening: Molecular Representations, Data Mining Methods, New Application Areas, and Performance Evaluation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 205-216.
3. Sheridan, R. P. Chemical similarity searches: When is complexity justified. Expert Opin. Drug Discovery 2007, 2, 423-430. (Pubitemid 47073070)
4. Willett, P. Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discovery Today 2006, 11, 1046-1053. (Pubitemid 44792477)
5. Willett, P. Similarity Methods in Chemoinformatics. Ann. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 3-71.
6. Leach, A. R.; Gillet, V. J. An Introduction to Chemoinformatics, 2nd ed.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007.
7. Turtle, H.; Croft, W. B. In Inference Networks for Document Retrieval, Proceedings of the 13th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Brussels, Belgium, September 5-7, 1990 Association for Computing Machinery: New York, 1990.
8. Turtle, H.; Croft, W. B. Evaluation of an Inference Network-Based Retrieval Model. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 1991, 9, 187-222.
9. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. In Inference Networks for Chemical Similarity Searching, Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, Phuket, Thailand, December 20-22, 2008; IEEE Computer Society: los Alamitos, CA, 2008; pp 408-412.
10. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. Similarity-Based Virtual Screening with a Bayesian Inference Network. ChemMedChem 2009, 4, 210-218.
11. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. Similarity-Based Virtual Screening Using Bayesian Inference Network: Enhanced Search Using 2D Fingerprints and Multiple Reference Structures. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2009, 28, 654-663.
12. Chen, B.; Mueller, C.; Willett, P. Evaluation of a Bayesian inference network for ligand-based virtual screening. J. Cheminf. 2009, 1(5); http://www.jcheminf.com/content/1/1/5; DOI: 10.1186/1758-2946-1-5. Accessed November 19, 2010.
13. Abdo, A.; Chen, B.; Mueller, C.; Salim, N.; Willett, P. Ligand-Based Virtual Screening Using Bayesian Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010, 50, 1012-1020.
14. Abdo, A. Similarity-Based Virtual Screening Using Bayesian Inference Network for Searching Chemical Database. Ph. D. Thesis, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia, 2009.
15. Willett, P. Textual and chemical information retrieval: different domains but similar algorithms. Inf. Research 2000, 5; http://informationr.net/ir/5-2/ paper69.html. Accessed November 19, 2010.
16. Abdo, A.; Salim, N. In Molecular Similarity Searching Using Inference Network, Proceedings of the 237th ACS National Meeting of the American Chemical Society, Salt Lake City, UT, March 22-26, 2009; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2009.
17. Callan, J. P.; Croft, W. B.; Broglio, J. TREC and TIPSTER experiments with InQuery. Inf. Process. Manage. 1995, 31, 327-343.
18. Robertson, S. E.; Walker, S. In Some Simple Effective Approximations to the 2-Poisson Model for Probabilistic Weighted Retrieval, Proceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Dublin, Ireland, July 3-6, 1994; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, 1994; pp 232-241.
19. Robertson, S. E.; Walker, S.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M. M. Large test collection experiments on an operational, interactive system: Okapi at TREC. Inf. Process. Manage. 1995, 31, 345-360.
20. Salton, G.; Buckley, C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 1988, 24, 513-523.
21. Chisholm, E.; Kolda, T. G. New Term Weighting Formulas for the Vector Space Method in Information Retrieval; Technical Report; Oak Ridge National Laboratory: Oak Ridge, TN, 1999.
22. Metzler, D.; Croft, W. B. Combining the language model and inference network approaches to retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 2004, 40, 735-750.
23. MDL Drug Data Report; Symyx Technologies: San Diego, CA; http://www.symyx.com/products/databases/bioactivity/mddr/index.jsp. Accessed November 19, 2010.
24. Pipeline Pilot; Accelrys Software Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2008.
25. Hert, J.; Willett, P.; Wilton, D. J.; Acklin, P.; Azzaoui, K.; Jacoby, E.; Schuffenhauer, A. New Methods for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening: use of Data Fusion and Machine Learning to Enhance the Effectiveness of Similarity Searching. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 462-470.
26. Rohrer, S. G.; Baumann, K. Maximum Unbiased Validation (MUV) Data Sets for Virtual Screening Based on PubChem Bioactivity Data. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 169-184.
27. Siegel, S.; Castellan, N. J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.