Nonperturbative theory of weak pre-and post-selected measurements

Physics Reports

Volumn 520, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 43-133

  Kofman, Abraham G ^a,b   Ashhab, Sahel ^a,b   Nori, Franco ^a,b  

^a RIKEN   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Foundations of quantum mechanics; Measurement theory; Precision metrology; Quantum information processing; Weak values

Indexed keywords

EID: 84867709031     PISSN: 03701573     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.physrep.2012.07.001     Document Type: Review

References (187)

1. von Neumann J. Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics 1955, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
2. Quantum Theory and Measurement 1983, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. J.A. Wheeler, W.H. Zurek (Eds.).
3. Braginsky V.B., Khalili F.Y. Quantum Measurement 1992, Cambridge University Press.
4. Wiseman H.M., Milburn G.J. Quantum Measurements and Control 2010, Cambridge University Press.
5. Schlosshauer M. Decoherence, the measurement problem, and interpretations of quantum mechanics. Rev. Modern Phys. 2004, 76:1267-1305.
6. Giovannetti V., Lloyd S., Maccone L. Quantum-enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit. Science 2004, 5700:1330-1336.
7. Dunningham J.A. Using quantum theory to improve measurement precision. Contemp. Phys. 2006, 47:257-267.
8. Nielsen M.A., Chuang I.L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information 2000, Cambridge University Press.
9. You J.Q., Nori F. Superconducting circuits and quantum information. Phys. Today 2005, 58(11):42-47.
10. Buluta I., Nori F. Quantum simulators. Science 2009, 326:108.
11. Maruyama K., Nori F., Vedral V. Physics of Maxwell's demon and information. Rev. Modern Phys. 2009, 81:1.
12. Shevchenko S.N., Ashhab S., Nori F. Landau-Zener-Stuckelberg interferometry. Phys. Rep. 2010, 492:1.
13. You J.Q., Nori F. Atomic physics and quantum optics using superconducting circuits. Nature 2011, 474:589.
14. Buluta I., Ashhab S., Nori F. Natural and artificial atoms for quantum computation. Rep. Progr. Phys 2011, 74:104401.
15. Ma J., Wang X., Sun C.P., Nori F. Quantum spin squeezing. Phys. Rep. 2011, 509:89-165.
16. I. Georgescu, F. Nori, Quantum simulations, Preprint (2011).
17. Nation P.D., Johansson J.R., Blencowe M.P., Nori F. Stimulating uncertainty: Amplifying the quantum vacuum with superconducting circuits. Rev. Modern Phys. 2012, 84:1-24.
18. Aharonov Y., Albert D.Z., Vaidman L. How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1988, 60:1351-1354.
19. Leggett A.J. Comment on "How the result of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62:2325.
20. Peres A. Quantum measurements with postselection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1989, 62:2326.
21. Dixon P.B., Starling D.J., Jordan A.N., Howell J.C. Ultrasensitive beam deflection measurement via interferometric weak value amplification. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102:173601.
22. Starling D.J., Dixon P.B., Williams N.S., Jordan A.N., Howell J.C. Continuous phase amplification with a Sagnac interferometer. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82:011802(R).
23. Bell J.S. On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox. Physics 1964, 1:195-200.
24. Aspect A. Bell's theorem: the naive view of an experimentalist. Quantum [Un]speakables-From Bell to Quantum Information 2002, 119-153. Springer. R.A. Bertlmann, A. Zeilinger (Eds.).
25. Ansmann M., Wang H., Bialczak R.C., Hofheinz M., Lucero E., Neeley M., O'Connell A.D., Sank D., Weides M., Wenner J., Cleland A.N., Martinis J.M. Violation of Bell's inequality in Josephson phase qubits. Nature 2009, 461:504-506.
26. Wei L.F., Liu Y.X., Nori F. Testing Bell's inequality in constantly coupled Josephson circuits by effective single-qubit operations. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72:104516.
27. Wei L.F., Liu Y.X., Storcz M.J., Nori F. Macroscopic Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen pairs in superconducting circuits. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73:052307.
28. Kofman A.G., Korotkov A.N. Analysis of Bell inequality violation in superconducting phase qubits. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77:104502.
29. Lüders G. Concerning the state-change due to the measurement process. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 1951, 8:322-328. [In German. English translation: Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 15 (2006) 663-670].
30. Misra B., Sudarshan E.C.G. Zeno's paradox in quantum theory. J. Math. Phys. 1977, 18:756-763.
31. Itano W.M., Heinzen D.J., Bollinger J.J., Wineland D.J. Quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41:2295-2300.
32. Kofman A.G., Kurizki G. Quantum Zeno effect on atomic excitation decay in resonators. Phys. Rev. A 1996, 54:R3750-R3753.
33. Gurvitz S.A. Measurements with a noninvasive detector and dephasing mechanism. Phys. Rev. B 1997, 56:15215-15223.
34. Kofman A.G., Kurizki G. Acceleration of quantum decay processes by frequent observations. Nature 2000, 405:546-550.
35. Fischer M.C., Gutierrez-Medina B., Raizen M.G. Observation of the quantum Zeno and anti-Zeno effects in an unstable system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 87:040402.
36. Facchi P., Nakazato H., Pascazio S. From the quantum Zeno to the inverse quantum Zeno effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86:2699-2703.
37. Koshino K., Shimizu A. Quantum Zeno effect by general measurements. Phys. Rep. 2005, 412:191-275.
38. Wang X.-B., You J.Q., Nori F. Quantum entanglement via two-qubit quantum Zeno dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 77:062339.
39. Zhou L., Yang S., Liu Y.X., Sun C.P., Nori F. Quantum Zeno switch for single-photon coherent transport. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80:062109.
40. Cao X., You J.Q., Zheng H., Kofman A.G., Nori F. Dynamics and quantum Zeno effect for a qubit in either a low-or high-frequency bath beyond the rotating-wave approximation. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82:022119.
41. Q. Ai, D. Xu, S. Yi, A.G. Kofman, C.P. Sun, F. Nori, Quantum anti-Zeno effect without wave function reduction, 2010. arxiv:1007.4859.
42. Cao X., Ai Q., Sun C.P., Nori F. The transition from quantum Zeno to anti-Zeno effects of a qubit in a cavity by modulating the cavity frequency. Phys. Lett. A 2012, 376:349-357.
43. Knill E., Laflamme R., Milburn G.J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 2001, 409:46-52.
44. Raussendorf R., Briegel H.J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86:5188-5191.
45. Raussendorf R., Browne D.E., Briegel H.J. Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 2003, 68:022312.
46. Nielsen M.A. Cluster-state quantum computation. Rep. Math. Phys. 2006, 57:147-161.
47. Tanamoto T., Liu Y., Fujita S., Hu X., Nori F. Producing cluster states in charge qubits and flux qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 97:230501.
48. You J.Q., Wang X.-B., Tanamoto T., Nori F. Efficient one-step generation of large cluster states with solid-state circuits. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 75:052319.
49. Tanamoto T., Liu Y.X., Hu X., Nori F. Efficient quantum circuits for one-way quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102:100501.
50. Briegel H.J., Browne D.E., Dür W., Raussendorf R., den Nest M.V. Measurement-based quantum computation. Nat. Phys. 2009, 9:19-26.
51. Ashhab S., Nori F. Control-free control: manipulating a quantum system using only a limited set of measurements. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82:062103.
52. Wiseman H.M. Quantum control: squinting at quantum systems. Nature 2011, 470:178-179.
53. Davies E.B. Quantum Theory of Open Systems 1976, Academic.
54. Kraus K. States, Effects, and Operations 1983, Springer.
55. Busch P., Lahti P., Mittelstaedt P. The Quantum Theory of Measurement 1996, Springer, Berlin.
56. Naimark M.A. Spectral functions of a symmetric operator. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 1940, 4:277-318.
57. Ota Y., Ashhab S., Nori F. Implementing general measurements on linear optical and solid-state qubits. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85:043808.
58. Banaszek K. Fidelity balance in quantum operations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001, 86:1366-1369.
59. Belavkin V.P., Staszevski P. Nondemolition observation of a free quantum particle. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 45:1347-1356.
60. Barchielli A. Stochastic differential-equations and a posteriori states in quantum-mechanics. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 1993, 32:2221-2233.
61. Dalibard J., Castin Y., Mølmer K. Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68:580-583.
62. Gardiner C.W., Parkins A.S., Zoller P. Wave-function quantum stochastic differential-equations and quantum-jump simulation methods. Phys. Rev. A 1992, 46:4363-4381.
63. Carmichael H.J. An Open Systems Approach to Quantum Optics 1993, Springer, Berlin.
64. Korotkov A.N. Continuous quantum measurement of a double dot. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 60:5737-5742.
65. Averin D.V., Sukhorukov E.V. Counting statistics and detector properties of quantum point contacts. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 95:126803.
66. Katz N., Ansmann M., Bialczak R.C., Lucero E., McDermott R., Neeley M., Steffen M., Weig E.M., Cleland A.N., Martinis J.M., Korotkov A.N. Coherent state evolution in a superconducting qubit from partial-collapse measurement. Science 2006, 312:1498-1500.
67. Jacobs K., Steck D.A. A straightforward introduction to continuous quantum measurement. Contemp. Phys. 2006, 47:279-303.
68. Ashhab S., You J.Q., Nori F. Weak and strong measurement of a qubit using a switching-based detector. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79:032317.
69. Ashhab S., You J.Q., Nori F. Information about the state of a charge qubit gained by a weakly coupled quantum point contact. Phys. Scr. 2009, T137:014005.
70. Ashhab S., You J.Q., Nori F. The information about the state of a qubit gained by a weakly coupled detector. New J. Phys. 2009, 11:083017.
71. Clerk A.A., Devoret M.H., Girvin S.M., Marquardt F., Schoelkopf R.J. Introduction to quantum noise, measurement, and amplification. Rev. Modern Phys. 2010, 82:1155-1208.
72. Palacios-Laloy A., Mallet F., Nguyen F., Bertet P., Vion D., Esteve D., Korotkov A.N. Experimental violation of a Bell's inequality in time with weak measurement. Nat. Phys. 2010, 6:442-447.
73. Zhang J., Wu R.-B., Li C.-W., Tarn T.-J. Protecting coherence and entanglement by quantum feedback controls. IEEE Trans. Automat. Control 2010, 55:619-633.
74. Y. Ota, S. Ashhab, F. Nori, Entanglement amplification via local weak measurements, 2012. arxiv:1201.2232.
75. Aharonov Y., Bergmann P.G., Lebowitz J.L. Time symmetry in the quantum process of measurement. Phys. Rev. 1964, 134:B1410-B1416.
76. Aharonov V., Vaidman L. The two-state vector formalism. Time in Quantum Mechanics 2002, 399-447. Springer. J. Muga, R.S. Mayato, I.L. Egusquiza (Eds.).
77. Aharonov Y., Rohrlich D. Quantum Paradoxes 2005, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim.
78. Aharonov Y., Popescu S., Tollaksen J. A time-symmetric formulation of quantum mechanics. Phys. Today 2010, 63(11):27-32.
79. Aharonov Y., Tollaksen J. New insights on time-symmetry in quantum mechanics. Visions of Discovery 2011, 105-151. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. R.Y. Chiao, M.L. Cohen, A.J. Leggett, W.D. Phillips, C.L. Harper (Eds.).
80. Ritchie N.W.M., Story J.G., Hulet R.G. Realization of a measurement of a weak value. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1991, 66:1107-1110.
81. Suter D., Ernst M., Ernst R.R. Quantum time-translation machine-an experimental realization. Mol. Phys. 1993, 78:95-102.
82. Suter D. Weak measurements and the quantum time-translation machine in a classical system. Phys. Rev. A 1995, 51:45-49.
83. Parks A.D., Cullin D.W., Stoudt D.C. Observation and measurement of an optical Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman effect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1998, 454:2997-3008.
84. Solli D.R., McCormik C.F., Chiao R.Y., Popescu S., Hickmann J.M. Fast light, slow light, and phase singularities: a connection to generalized weak values. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 92:043601.
85. Brunner N., Scarani V., Wegmüller M., Legré M., Gisin N. Direct measurement of superluminal group velocity and signal velocity in an optical fiber. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93:203902.
86. Resch K.J., Lundeen J.S., Steinberg A.M. Experimental realization of the quantum box problem. Phys. Lett. A 2004, 324:125-131.
87. Pryde G.J., O'Brien J.L., White A.G., Ralph T.C., Wiseman H.M. Measurement of quantum weak values of photon polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2005, 94:220405.
88. Wang Q., Sun F.-W., Zhang Y.-S., Jian-Li, Huang Y.-F., Guo G.-C. Experimental demonstration of a method to realize weak measurement of the arrival time of a single photon. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73:023814.
89. Mir R., Lundeen J.S., Mitchell M.W., Steinberg A.M., Garretson J.L., Wiseman H.M. A double-slit 'which-way' experiment on the complementarity -uncertainty debate. New J. Phys. 2007, 9:287.
90. Hosten O., Kwiat P. Observation of the spin Hall effect of light via weak measurements. Science 2008, 319:787-790.
91. Lundeen J.S., Steinberg A.M. Experimental joint weak measurement on a photon pair as a probe of Hardy's paradox. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2009, 102:020404.
92. Yokota K., Yamamoto T., Koashi M., Imoto N. Direct observation of Hardy's paradox by joint weak measurement with an entangled photon pair. New J. Phys. 2009, 11:033011.
93. Howell J.C., Starling D.J., Dixon P.B., Vudyasetu P.K., Jordan A.N. Interferometric weak value deflections: quantum and classical treatments. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81:033813.
94. Starling D.J., Dixon P.B., Jordan A.N., Howell J.C. Optimizing the signal-to-noise ratio of a beam-deflection measurement with interferometric weak values. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80:041803(R).
95. Starling D.J., Dixon P.B., Jordan A.N., Howell J.C. Precision frequency measurements with interferometric weak values. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82:063822.
96. Cho Y.-W., Lim H.-T., Ra Y.-S., Kim Y.-H. Weak value measurement with an incoherent measuring device. New J. Phys. 2010, 12:023036.
97. Goggin M.E., Almeida M.P., Barbieri M., Lanyon B.P., O'Bryen J.L., White A.G., Pryde G.J. Violation of the Leggett-Garg inequality with weak measurements of photons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108:1256-1261.
98. Iinuma M., Suzuki Y., Taguchi G., Kadoya Y., Hofmann H.F. Weak measurement of photon polarization by back-action-induced path interference. New J. Phys. 2011, 13:033041.
99. Turner M.D., Hagedorn C.A., Schlamminger S., Gundlach J.H. Picoradian deflection measurement with an interferometric quasi-autocollimator using weak value amplification. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36:1479-1481.
100. Hogan J.M., Hammer J., Chiow S.-W., Dickerson S., Johnson D.M.S., Kovachy T., Sugarbaker A., Kasevich M.A. Precision angle sensor using an optical lever inside a Sagnac interferometer. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36:1698-1700.
101. Kocsis S., Braverman B., Ravets S., Stevens M.J., Mirin R.P., Shalm L.K., Steinberg A.M. Observing the average trajectories of single photons in a two-slit interferometer. Science 2011, 332:1170-1173.
102. Lundeen J.S., Sutherland B., A Patel, C Stewart, Bamber C. Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction. Nature 2011, 474:188-191.
103. Johansen L.M. A. Luis, Nonclassicality in weak measurements. Phys. Rev. A 2004, 70:052115.
104. Williams N.S., Jordan A.N. Weak values and the Leggett-Garg inequality in solid-state qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:026804.
105. Leggett A.J., Garg A. Quantum-mechanics versus macroscopic realism-is the flux there when nobody looks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1985, 54:857-860.
106. Leggett A.J. Testing the limits of quantum mechanics: motivation, state of play, prospects. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2002, 14:R415-R451.
107. Lambert N., Emary C., Chen Y.N., Nori F. Distinguishing quantum and classical transport through nanostructures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105:176801.
108. Lambert N., Chen Y.-N, Nori F. Unified single-photon and single-electron counting statistics: from cavity-QED to electron transport. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 82:063840.
109. Lambert N., Johansson R., Nori F. Macrorealism inequality for optoelectromechanical systems. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84:245-421.
110. G.-Y. Chen, N. Lambert, C.-M. Li, Y.-N. Chen, F. Nori, Quantum signatures in a macroscopic dipole moment, preprint (2011).
111. Wiseman H.M. Grounding Bohmian mechanics in weak values and bayesianism. New J. Phys. 2007, 9:165.
112. Dressel J., Agarwal S., Jordan A.N. Contextual values of observables in quantum measurements 2010, Phys. Rev. Lett.:240401.
113. Duck I.M., Stevenson P.M., Sudarshan E.C.G. The sense in which a weak measurement of a spin-1/2 particles spin component yields a value 100. Phys. Rev. D 1989, 40:2112-2117.
114. Aharonov Y., Vaidman L. Properties of a quantum system during the time interval between 2 measurements. Phys. Rev. A 1990, 41:11-20.
115. Knight J.M., Vaidman L. Weak measurement of photon polarization. Phys. Lett. A 1990, 143:357-361.
116. Steinberg A.M. How much time does a tunneling particle spend in the barrier region. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 74:2405-2409.
117. Aharonov Y., Massar S., Popescu S., Tollaksen J., Vaidman L. Adiabatic measurements on metastable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996, 77:983-987.
118. Wiseman H.M. Weak values, quantum trajectories, and the cavity-QED experiment on wave-particle correlation. Phys. Rev. A 2002, 65:032111.
119. Brunner N., Acín A., Collins D., Gisin N., Scarani V. Optical telecom networks as weak quantum measurements with postselection. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2003, 91:180402.
120. Johansen L.M. Weak measurements with arbitrary probe states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93:120402.
121. Aharonov Y., Botero A. Quantum averages of weak values. Phys. Rev. A 2005, 72:052111.
122. Lundeen J.S., Resch K.J. Practical measurement of joint weak values and their connection for the annihilation operator. Phys. Lett. A 2005, 334:337-344.
123. Ralph T.C., Bartlett S.D., O'Brien J.L., Pryde G.J., Wiseman H.M. Quantum nondemolition measurements for quantum information. Phys. Rev. A 2006, 73:012113.
124. Jozsa R. Complex weak values in quantum measurement. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 76:044103.
125. Tollaksen J. Pre-and post-selection, weak values, and contextuality. J. Phys. A 2007, 40:9033-9066.
126. Lorenzo A.D., Egues J.C. Weak measurement: effect of the detector dynamics. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 77:042108.
127. Brun T.A., Diósi L., Strunz W.T. Test of weak measurement on a two-or three-qubit computer. Phys. Rev. A 2008, 77:032101.
128. Aharonov Y., Popescu S., Tollaksen J., Vaidman L. Multiple-time states and multiple-time measurements in quantum mechanics. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 79:052110.
129. Lobo A.C., Ribeiro C.A. Weak values and the quantum phase space. Phys. Rev. A 2009, 80:012112.
130. Wu S., Mølmer K. Weak measurements with a qubit meter. Phys. Lett. A 2009, 374:34-39.
131. S. Ashhab, F. Nori, How the results of a measurement of a component of the spin of a spin-1/2 particle can turn out to be 100 without using weak measurements, 2009. arxiv:0907.4823.
132. Hofmann H.F. Complete characterization of post-selected quantum statistics using weak measurement tomography. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81:012103.
133. Geszti T. Postselected weak measurement beyond the weak value. Phys. Rev. A 2010, 81:044102.
134. Brunner N., Simon C. Measuring small longitudinal phase shifts: weak measurements or standard interferometry?. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105:010405.
135. Steinberg A.M. A light touch. Nature 2010, 463:890-891.
136. Hosoya A., Shikano Y. Strange weak values. J. Phys. A 2010, 43:385307.
137. Kedem Y., Vaidman L. Modular values and weak values of quantum observables. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 105:230401.
138. Tollaksen J., Aharonov Y., Casher A., Kaufherr T., Nussinov S. Quantum interference experiments, modular variables and weak measurements. New J. Phys. 2010, 12:013023.
139. Berry M.V., Shukla P. Typical weak and superweak values. J. Phys. A 2010, 43:354024.
140. Berry M.V., Dennis M.R., McRoberts B., Shukla P. Weak value distributions for spin 1/2. J. Phys. A 2011, 44:205301.
141. Simon C., Polzik E.S. Fock-state view of weak-value measurements and implementation with photons and atomic ensembles. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83:040101(R).
142. Wu S., Li Y. Weak measurements beyond the Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman formalism. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83:052106.
143. Li C.-F., Xu X.-Y., Tang J.-S., Xu J.-S., Guo G.-C. Ultrasensitive phase estimation with white light. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 83:044102.
144. Aharonov Y., Colombo F., Sabadini I., Struppa D.C., Tollaksen J. Some mathematical properties of superoscillations. J. Phys. A 2011, 44:365304.
145. Nakamura K., Nishizawa A., Fujimoto M.-K. Evaluation of weak measurements to all orders. Phys. Rev. A 2012, 85:012113.
146. Berry M.V., Shukla P. Pointer supershifts and superoscillations in weak measurements. J. Phys. A 2012, 45:015301.
147. Shikano Y. Theory of "weak value" and quantum mechanical measurements. Measurements in Quantum Mechanics 2012, 75-100. InTech. M.R. Pahlavani (Ed.).
148. B.E.Y. Svensson, New wine in old bottles: quantum measurement-direct, indirect, weak-with some applications, 2012. arxiv:1202.5148.
149. Romito A., Gefen Y., Blanter Y.M. Weak values of electron spin in a double quantum dot. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 100:056801.
150. Shpitalnik V., Gefen Y., Romito A. Tomography of many-body weak values: Mach-Zehnder interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008, 101:226802.
151. Aharonov Y., Vaidman L. Complete description of a quantum system at a given time. J. Phys. A 1991, 24:2315-2328.
152. Time-symmetric quantum mechanics questioned and defended (letters). Phys. Today 2011, 64(5):8-9. 62-63.
153. Consistent treatments of quantum mechanics (letters). Phys. Today 2011, 64(10):8-10.
154. Leifer M.S., Spekkens R.W. Logical pre-and post-selection paradoxes, measurement-disturbance and contextuality. Internat. J. Theoret. Phys. 2005, 44:1977-1987.
155. Kirkwood J.G. Quantum statistics of almost classical assemblies. Phys. Rev. 1933, 44:31-37.
156. Johansen L.M. Quantum theory of successive projective measurements. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 76:012119.
157. Onoda M., Murakami S., Nagaosa N. Hall effect of light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93:083901.
158. Bliokh K.Y., Bliokh Y.P. Conservation of angular momentum, transverse shift, and spin hall effect in reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave packet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2006, 96:073903.
159. Bliokh K.Y., Niv A., Kleiner V., Hasman E. Geometrodynamics of spinning light. Nature Photonics 2008, 2:748-753.
160. Nori F. The dynamics of spinning light. Nature Photonics 2008, 2:716-717.
161. Fedorov F.I. To the theory of total reflection. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 1955, 105:465-467. [English translation is available at http://master.basnet.by/congress2011/symposium/spbi.pdf].
162. Imbert C. Calculation and experimental proof of the transverse shift induced by total internal reflection of a circularly polarized light beam. Phys. Rev. D 1972, 5:787-796.
163. Bliokh K.Y., Bliokh Y.P. Polarization, transverse shifts, and angular momentum conservation laws in partial reflection and refraction of an electromagnetic wave packet. Phys. Rev. E 2007, 75:066609.
164. Aiello A., Woerdman J.P. Role of beam propagation in Goos-Häanchen and Imbert-Fedorov shifts. Opt. Lett. 2008, 33:1437-1439.
165. Qin Y., Li Y., Feng X., Xiao Y.-F., Yang H., Gong Q. Observation of the in-plane spin separation of light. Opt. Express 2011, 19:9636-9645.
166. Dennis M.R., Götte J.B. The analogy between optical beam shifts and quantum weak measurements. New J. Phys. 2012, 14:073013.
167. Gorodetski Y., Bliokh K.Y., Stein B., Genet C., Shitrit N., Kleiner V., Hasman E., Ebbesen T.W. Weak measurements of light chirality with a plasmonic slit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2012, 109:013901.
168. Glauber R.J. Optical coherence and photon statistics. Quantum Optics and Electronics 1965, 65-185. Gordon and Breach, New York. C. DeWitt, A. Blandin, C. Cohen-Tannoudji (Eds.).
169. D.J. Starling, P.B. Dixon, N.S. Williams, A.N. Jordan, J.C. Howell, Continuous phase amplification with a Sagnac interferometer, 2009. arxiv:0912.2357v2.
170. Hong C.K., Ou Z.Y., Mandel L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between 2 photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1987, 59:2044-2046.
171. Sokolovski D. Weak values, negative probability, and the uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. A 2007, 76:042125.
172. Foster G.T., Orozco L.A., Castro-Beltran H.M., Carmichael H.J. Quantum state reduction and conditional time evolution of wave-particle correlations in cavity QED. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2000, 85:3149-3152.
173. Hardy L. Quantum-mechanics, local realistic theories, and lorentz-invariant realistic theories. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1992, 68:2981-2984.
174. Brooks M. Curiouser and curiouser. New Sci. 2003, 178(May):28.
175. Elitzur A.C., Vaidman L. Quantum-mechanical interaction-free measurements. Found. Phys. 1993, 23:987-997.
176. Aharonov Y., Botero A., Popescu S., Reznik B., Tollaksen J. Revisiting Hardy's paradox: counterfactual statements, real measurements, entanglement and weak values. Phys. Lett. A 2002, 301:130-138.
177. Scully M.O., Englert B.-G., Walther H. Quantum optical tests of complementarity. Nature 1991, 351:111-116.
178. Storey E.P., Tan S.M., Collett M.J., Walls D.F. Path detection and the uncertainty principle. Nature 1994, 367:626-628.
179. Winful H.G. Tunneling time, the Hartman effect, and superluminality: a proposed resolution of an old paradox. Phys. Rep. 2006, 436:1-69.
180. Robertson H.P. The uncertainty principle. Phys. Rev. 1929, 31:163-164.
181. Koike T., Tanaka S. Limits on amplification of Aharonov-Albert-Vaidman weak measurement. Phys. Rev. A 2011, 84:062106.
182. Gardiner C.W., Zoller P. Quantum Noise 2000, Springer, Berlin.
183. Schrödinger E. To the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Sitsungsber. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. 1930, 19:296-303. (In German).
184. Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M. Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory 1977, Pergamon.
185. Helstrom C.W. Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory 1976, Academic Press, New York.
186. Korn G.A., Korn T.M. Mathematical Handbook 1968, McGraw-Hill, New York.
187. Chisolm E.D. Generalizing the Heisenberg uncertainty relation. Amer. J. Phys. 2001, 69:368-371.