Measurement-based quantum computation

Nature Physics

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 19-36

  Briegel, H J ^a,b   Browne, D E ^c   Dur W ^a,b   Raussendorf, R ^d   Van Den Nest, M ^b,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INNSBRUCK   (Austria)

^b ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^e MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR QUANTENOPTIK   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAULT TOLERANCE; QUANTUM COMPUTERS; QUANTUM OPTICS;

ENTANGLED STATE; EXPERIMENTAL REALIZATIONS; MEASUREMENT-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTATION; MODELS OF QUANTUM COMPUTATIONS; OF QUANTUM-INFORMATION; PRACTICAL ISSUES;

QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT;

EID: 58149330782     PISSN: 17452473     EISSN: 17452481     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1157     Document Type: Article

References (106)

1. Deutsch, D. Quantum computational networks. Proc. R. Soc. A 425, 73-90 (1989).
2. Barenco, A. et al. Elementary gates for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 52, 3457-3467(1995).
3. Farhi, E. et al. A quantum adiabatic evolution algorithm applied to random instances of an NP-complete problem. Science 292, 472-476 (2001).
4. Deutsch, D. Quantum-theory the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 97-117 (1985).
5. Bernstein, E. & Vazirani, U. Proc. 25th Annual ACM Symp. on the Theory of Computing 11-20 (ACM, 1993).
6. Gottesman, D. & Chuang, I. L. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations. Nature 402, 390-393 (1999).
7. Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Milburn, G. J. A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics. Nature 409, 46-52 (2001).
8. Nielsen, M. A. Quantum computation by measurement and quantum memory. Phys. Lett. A 308, 96-100 (2003).
9. Leung, D. W. Quantum computation by measurements. Int. J. Quantum Inform. 2, 33-43 (2004).
10. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. A one-way quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5188-5191 (2001).
11. Raussendorf, R. & Briegel, H. J. Computational model underlying the one-way quantum computer. Quantum Inform. Comput. 2, 443-486 (2002).
12. Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E. & Briegel, H. J. Measurement-based quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 68, 022312 (2003).
13. Aliferis, P. & Leung, D. W. Computation by measurements: A unifying picture. Phys. Rev. A 70, 062314 (2004).
14. Perdrix, S. & Jorrand, P. Measurement-based quantum turing machines and their universality. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/ 0404146〉 (2004).
15. Danos, V., Kashefi, E. & Panangaden, P. The measurement calculus. J. Association Comput. Machinery 54, 8 (2007).
16. Childs, A. M., Leung, D. W. & Nielsen, M. A. Unified derivations of measurement-based schemes for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 71, 032318 (2005).
17. Browne, D. E., Kashefi, E., Mhalla, M. & Perdrix, S. Generalized flow and determinism in measurement-based quantum computation. New J. Phys. 9, 250 (2007).
18. Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Valence-bond states for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 70, 060302 (2004).
19. Gross, D. & Eisert, J. Novel schemes for measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 220503 (2007).
20. Briegel, H. J. & Raussendorf, R. Persistent entanglement in arrays of interacting particles. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 910-913 (2001).
21. Hein, M. et al. in Quantum Computers, Algorithms and Chaos Vol. 162 Int. School of Physics Enrico Fermi (eds Casati, G et al.) 115-218 (IOS Press, 2006).
22. Jaksch, D., Briegel, H. J., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W. & Zoller, P. Entanglement of atoms via cold controlled collisions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1975-1978 (1999).
23. Jaksch, D. & Zoller, P. The cold atom Hubbard toolbox. Ann. Phys. 315, 52-79 (2005).
24. Briegel, H. J., Raussendorf, R. & Schenzle, A. in Laser Physics at the Limits (eds Figger, H. et al.) 236-261 (Springer, 2002).
25. Mandel, O. et al. Controlled collisions for multi-particle entanglement of optically trapped atoms. Nature 425, 937-940 (2003).
26. Bloch, I. Ultracold quantum gases in optical lattices. Nature Phys. 1, 23-30 (2005).
27. Greiner, M., Mandel, O., Esslinger, T., Hansch, T. W. & Bloch, I. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature 415, 39-44 (2002).
28. Jaksch, D., Bruder, C., Cirac, J. I., Gardiner, C. W. & Zoller, P. Cold bosonic atoms in optical lattices. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3108-3111 (1998).
29. Anderlini, M. et al. Controlled exchange interaction between pairs of neutral atoms in an optical lattice. Nature 448, 452-455 (2007).
30. Trotzky, S. et al. Time-resolved observation and control of superexchange interactions with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science 319, 295-299 (2008).
31. Nelson, K. D., Li., X. & Weiss, D. S. Imaging single atoms in a three-dimensional array. Nature Phys. 3, 556-560 (2007).
32. Miroshnychenko, Y. et al. An atom-sorting machine. Nature 442, 151 (2006).
33. Cho, J. Addressing individual atoms in optical lattices with standing-wave driving fields. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 020502 (2007).
34. Gorshkov, A. V., Jiang, L., Greiner, M., Zoller, P. & Lukin, M. D. Coherent quantum optical control with sub-wavelength resolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 093005 (2008).
35. Yi, W., Daley, A. J., Pupillo, G. & Zoller, P. State-dependent addressable subwavelength lattices with cold atoms. New J. Phys. 10, 073015 (2008).
36. Vaucher, B., Nunnenkamp, A. & Jaksch, D. Creation of robust entangled states and new resources for measurement-based quantum computation using optical superlattices. New J. Phys. 10, 023005 (2008).
37. Nielsen, M. A. Optical quantum computation using cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040503 (2004).
38. Barrett, S. D. & Kok, P. Efficient high-fidelity quantum computation using matter qubits and linear optics. Phys. Rev. A 71, 060310 (2005).
39. Duan, L. M. & Raussendorf, R. Efficient quantum computation with probabilistic quantum gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 080503 (2005).
40. Gross, D., Kieling, K. & Eisert, J. Potential and limits to cluster state quantum computing using probabilistic gates. Phys. Rev. A 74, 042343 (2006).
41. Kieling, K., Rudolph, T. & Eisert, J. Percolation renormalization and quantum computing with non-deterministic gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130501 (2007).
42. Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. Resource-efficient linear optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010501 (2005).
43. Walther, P. et al. Experimental one-way quantum computing. Nature 434, 169-176 (2005).
44. Kiesel, N. et al. Experimental analysis of a four-qubit photon cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 210502 (2005).
45. Lu., C. Y. et al. Experimental entanglement of six photons in graph states. Nature Phys. 3, 91-95 (2007).
46. Prevedel, R. et al. High-speed linear optics quantum computing using active feed-forward. Nature 445, 65-69 (2007).
47. Vallone, G., Pomarico, E., De Martini, F., Mataloni, P. & Berardi, V. Realization and characterization of a 2-photon 4-qubit linear cluster state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 180502 (2007).
48. Chen, K. et al. Experimental realization of one-way quantum computing with two-photon four-qubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 120503 (2007).
49. Vallone, G., Pomarico, E., De Martini, F. & Mataloni, P. Active one-way quantum computation with 2-photon 4-qubit cluster states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 160502 (2008).
50. Moehring, D. L. et al. Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance. Nature 449, 68-71 (2007).
51. Laurat, J. et al. Towards experimental entanglement connection with atomic ensembles in the single excitation regime. New J. Phys. 9, 207 (2007).
52. Lim, Y. L., Beige, A. & Kwek, L. C. Repeat-until-success linear optics distributed quantum computing. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 030505 (2005).
53. Kieling, K., Gross, D. & Eisert, J. Cluster state preparation using gates operating at arbitrary success probabilities. New J. Phys. 9, 200 (2007).
54. Benjamin, S. C., Browne, D. E., Fitzsimons, J. & Morton, J. J. L. Brokered graph-state quantum computation. New J. Phys. 8, 141 (2006).
55. Tanamoto, T., Liu, Y. X., Fujita, S., Hu, X. & Nori, F. Producing cluster states in charge qubits and flux qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 230501 (2006).
56. Borhani, M. & Loss, D. Cluster states from Heisenberg interaction. Phys. Rev. A 71, 034308 (2005).
57. Weinstein, Y. S., Hellberg, C. S. & Levy, J. Quantum-dot cluster-state computing with encoded qubits. Phys. Rev. A 72, 020304(R) (2005).
58. Shor, P. W. Proc. 37th Annual Sytnp. Foundations of Computer Science 56-65 (IEEE Computer Society Press, 1996).
59. Knill, E., Laflamme, R. & Zurek, W. H. Resilient quantum computation: Error models and thresholds. Proc. R. Soc. A 454, 365-384 (1998).
60. Aharonov, D. & Ben-Or, M. Proc. Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM Sytnp. on Theory of Computing 176-188 (El Paso, 1997).
61. Gottesman, D. Stabilizer Codes and Quantum Error Correction. Thesis, Caltech (1997).
62. Aliferis, P., Gottesman, D. & Preskill, J. Quantum accuracy threshold for concatenated distance-3 codes. Quantum Information Comput. 6, 97-165 (2006).
63. Aharonov, D., Kitaev, A. & Preskill, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with long-range correlated noise. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050504 (2006).
64. Knill, E. Quantum computing with realistically noisy devices. Nature 434, 39-44 (2005).
65. Raussendorf, R. Measurement-Based Quantum Computation with Cluster States. Thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians-Univ. Munich (2003).
66. Nielsen, M. A. & Dawson, C. M. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with cluster states. Phys. Rev. A 71, 042323 (2005).
67. Aliferis, P. & Leung, D. W. Computation by measurements: A unifying picture. Phys. Rev. A 70, 062314 (2004).
68. Mor, T. & Yoran, N. Methods for scalable optical quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 090501 (2006).
69. Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical quantum computers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 020501 (2006).
70. Dawson, C. M., Haselgrove, H. L. & Nielsen, M. A. Noise thresholds for optical cluster-state quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 73, 052306 (2006).
71. Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. Loss tolerance in one-way quantum computation via counterfactual error correction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 120501 (2006).
72. Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008).
73. Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. A fault-tolerant one-way quantum computer. Ann. Phys. 321, 2242-2270 (2006).
74. Kitaev, A. Y. Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons. Ann. Phys. 303, 2-30 (2003).
75. Raussendorf, R., Harrington, J. & Goyal, K. Topological fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation. New J. Phys. 9, 199 (2007).
76. Bravyi, S. & Kitaev, A. Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas. Phys. Rev. A 71, 022316 (2005).
77. Raussendorf, R. & Harrington, J. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with high threshold in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190504 (2007).
78. Svore, K. M., DiVincenzo, D. P. & Terhal, B. M. Noise threshold for a fault-tolerant two-dimensional lattice architecture. Quant. Inf. Comp. 7, 297-318 (2007).
79. Van den Nest, M., Dür, W., Miyake, A. & Briegel, H. J. Fundamentals of universality in one-way quantum computation. New J. Phys. 9, 204 (2007).
80. Van den Nest, M., Miyake, A., Dür, W. & Briegel, H. J. Universal resources for measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 150504 (2006).
81. Vidal, G. Entanglement monotones. J. Mod. Opt. 47, 355-376 (2000).
82. Browne, D. E. et al. Phase transition of computational power in the resource states for one-way quantum computation. New J. Phys. 10, 023010 (2008).
83. Bartlett, S. D. & Rudolph, T. Simple nearest-neighbor two-body Hamiltonian system for which the ground state is a universal resource for quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 74, 040302 (R) (2006).
84. Tame, M. S., Paternostro, M. & Kim, M. S. One-way quantum computing in a decoherence-free subspace. New J. Phys. 9, 201 (2007).
85. Gross, D., Eisert, J., Schuch, N. & Perez-Garcia, D. Measurement-based quantum computation beyond the one-way model. Phys. Rev. A 76, 052315 (2007).
86. Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B. & Werner, R. F. Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains. Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443-490 (1992).
87. Verstraete, F., Wolf, M. M., Perez-Garcia, D. & Cirac, J. I. Criticality the area law and the computational power of projected entangled pair states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 220601 (2006).
88. Markov, I. & Shi, Y. Simulating quantum computation by contracting tensor networks. SIAM J. Comput. 38, 963-981 (2008).
89. Jozsa, R. On the simulation of quantum circuits. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0603163〉 (2006).
90. Yoran, N. & Short, A. J. Classical simulation of limited-width cluster-state quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 170503 (2006).
91. Shi, Y.-Y., Duan, L.-M. & Vidal, G. Classical simulation of quantum many-body systems with a tree tensor network. Phys. Rev. A 74, 022320 (2006).
92. Bravyi, S. & Raussendorf, R. Measurement-based quantum computation with the toric code states. Phys. Rev. A 76, 022304 (2007).
93. Verstraete, F. & Cirac, J. I. Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006).
94. Van den Nest, M., Dür, W., Vidal, G. & Briegel, H. J. Classical simulation versus universality in measurement-based quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 75, 012337 (2007).
95. Van den Nest, M., Dür, W. & Briegel, H. J. Completeness of the classical 2D Ising model and universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 110501 (2008).
96. Van den Nest, M., Dür, W. & Briegel, H. J. Classical spin models and the quantum-stabilizer formalism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 117207 (2007).
97. Wu, F. Y. The Potts model. Rev. Mod. Phys. 54, 235-268 (1982).
98. Mezard, M., Parisi, G. & Virasoro, M. A. Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (Word Scientific, 1987).
99. Bombin, H. & Martin-Delgado, M. Statistical mechanical models and topological color codes. Phys. Rev. A 77, 042322 (2008).
100. Lidar, D. A. On the quantum computational complexity of the Ising spin glass partition function and of knot invariants. New J. Phys. 6, 167 (2004).
101. Somma, R. D., Batista, C. D. & Ortiz, G. A quantum approach to classical statistical mechanics. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant- ph/0609216〉 (2006).
102. Aharonov, D., Arad, I., Eban, E. & Landau, Z. Polynomial quantum algorithms for additive approximations of the Potts model and other points of the Tutte plane. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0702008〉 (2007).
103. Van den Nest, M. & Briegel, H. J. Measurement-based quantum computation and undecidable logic. Foundations Phys. 38, 448-457 (2008).
104. Nielsen, M. A. Cluster-state quantum computation. Rep. Math. Phys. 57, 147-161 (2006).
105. Jozsa, R. An introduction to measurement based quantum computation. Preprint at 〈http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0508124〉 (2005).
106. Browne, D. E. & Briegel, H. J. in Lectures on Quantum Information (eds Bruss, D. & Leuchs, G.) 359-371 (Wiley-VCH, 2006).