Current dental adhesives systems. A narrative review

Current Pharmaceutical Design

Volumn 18, Issue 34, 2012, Pages 5542-5552

  Milia, Egle ^a   Cumbo, Enzo ^b   Cardoso, Rielson Josè A ^c   Gallina, Giuseppe ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASSARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^c SÃO LEOPOLDO MANDIC INSTITUTE AND RESEARCH CENTER   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resin; Dental adhesive; Dentine; Enamel; Phosphoric acid

Indexed keywords

10 METHACRYLOXYDECYL DIHYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; 2 HYDROXYETHYL METHACRYLATE; 2 METHACRYLOXYETHYL PHENYL HYDROGEN PHOSPHATE; ACID; BENZOYL PEROXIDE; BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; BISPHENOL GLYCIDYL DIMETHACRYLATEOR URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE; CALCIUM PHOSPHATE; CARBOXYLIC ACID; COLLAGEN; ETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; FILLER; FLUORIDE; GAMMA METHACRYLOXPROPYL TRIMETHOXY SILANE; GLASS IONOMER; HYPOCHLORITE SODIUM; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER; MONOMER; NANOCOMPOSITE; PHOSPHORIC ACID; RESIN; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; URETHANE DIMETHACRYLATE; VINYL TRIETHOXYSILANE;

ADHESION; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER MODEL; CYTOTOXICITY; DEMINERALIZATION; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTIN; DENTISTRY; DIFFUSION; ENAMEL; HYDROPHILICITY; HYDROPHOBICITY; MATERIALS HANDLING; MORPHOLOGY; POLYMERIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLUBILITY; TOOTH; TOOTH PULP DISEASE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VISCOSITY;

ACRYLIC RESINS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ETCHING; DENTIN; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; HUMANS; POLYURETHANES;

EID: 84867708983     PISSN: 13816128     EISSN: 18734286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2174/138161212803307491     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Nicholson JW, Chemistry of glass-ionomer cements: a review. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 485-94.
2. Walls AWG, Glass Polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements: a rewiew. J Dent 1986; 14: 231-46.
3. Wilson AD, Developments in glass-ionomer cements 1989; 5: 438-66.
4. Xie D, Brantley WA, Culbertson BM, Wang G, Mechanical properties and microstructures of glass-ionomer cements. Dent Mat 2000; 2: 129-38.
5. Cramer NB, Stansbury JW, Bowman CN, Recent advances and developments in composite dental restorative materials. J Dent Res, 2011; 4: 402-16.
6. Atai M, Pahlavan A, Moin N. Nano-porous thermally sintered nano silica as novel fillers for dental composites. Dent Mater 2012 (2): 133-45.
7. Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Odatsu T, et al. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2011; (3): 283-91.
8. Hosseinalipour M, Javadpour J, Rezaie H, Dadras T, Hayati AN. Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental BisGMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles. J Prosthodont 2010 (2): 112-7.
9. Torres CR, Borges AB, Goncalves SE, Pucci CR, de Araujo MA, Barcellos DC. Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: a three-year report. Gen Dent 2010; (4): 338-43.
10. Majety KK, Pujar M. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers. J Conserv Dent 2011; (4): 414-7.
11. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-53.
12. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 265-73.
13. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentinbonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 133-8.
14. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Evidence of chemical bonding at biomaterial-hard tissue interfaces. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 709-14.
15. Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, et al. Comparative study on adhesive performance of adhesive monomers. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 454-8.
16. Bertassoni LE, Stankoska K, Swain MV. Insights into the structure and composition of the peritubular dentin organic matrix and the lamina limitans. Micron 2012; 43: 229-36.
17. Pashley DH, Horner JA, Brewer PD. Interactions of conditioners on the dentin surface. Oper Dent 1992; 17: 137-50.
18. Burrow MF, Takakura H, Nakajima M, Inai N, Tagami J, Takatsu T. The influence of age and depth of dentin on bonding. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 241-6.
19. Perdigao J, Swift EJ, Denehy GE, Wefel JS, Donly KJ. In vitro bond strengths and SEM evaluation of dentin bonding systems to different dentin substrates. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 44-55.
20. Nakajima M, Sano H, Burrow MF, et al. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of caries-affected dentin using dentin adhesives. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1679-88.
21. Demirci M, Hiller KA, Bosl C, Galler K, Schmalz G, Schweikl H. The induction of oxidative stress, cytotoxicity, and genotoxicity by dental adhesives. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 362-71.
22. Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomat 2007; 28: 3757-85.
23. Schmalz G. Concepts in biocompatibility testing of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1: 154-62.
24. Wej Y, Silikas N, Zhang Z, Watts DC. Diffusion and concurrent solubility of self-adhering and new resin-matrix composites during water sorption/desorption cycles. Dent Mat 2011; 27: 197-205.
25. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater 2006; 22: 211-22.
26. Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1212-20.
27. Moszner N, Salz U, Zimmermann J. Chemical aspects of self etching enamel-dentin adhesives: a systematic review. Dent Mater 2005; 21: 895-910.
28. Imazato S, Russell RR, McCabe JF. Antibacterial activity of MDPB polymer incorporated in dental resin. J Dent 1995; 23: 177-81.
29. Milia E, Campus G, Santini A. Resin adhesion to sclerotic dentin: an in vivo TEM study of a new antibacterial system. J Dent Res 82 (Special Issue) 2003; 255. Abstract #1954.
30. Valle D, Solinas G, Santini A, Gallottini L, Milia E. Antibacterial activity of a new self-etching adhesive system: in vivo TEM observation. International Kuraray Symposium of Adhesive Dentistry, Dusseldorf, Germany 2004, Abstract #11.
31. Giammanco GM, Cumbo EM, Luciani A, Gallina G, Mammina C, Pizzo G. In vitro evaluation of the antibacterial activity of cured dentin/enamel adhesive incorporating the antimicrobial agent MDPB. New Microbiol 2009; 32: 385-90.
32. Milia E, Cotti E, Sotgiu G, Masarin M, Manunta A, Gallina G. In vivo, morphological and clinical effect of a desensitizing agent. Dent Mat 2010; Supplement 26: 1 e67.
33. Ferracane JL, Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res 1986; 20: 121-31.
34. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mat 2006; 22: 211-22.
35. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Singlestep adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent 2002; 30: 371-82, a.
36. Friedman M. Chemistry, biochemistry, and safety of acrylamide. A review. J Agric Food Chem 2003; 51: 4504-26.
37. Spagnuolo G, Galler K, Schmalz G, Cosentino C, Rengo S, Schweikl H. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase amplifies TEGDMA-induced apoptosis in primary human pulp cells. J Dent Res 2004; 83: 703-7.
38. Schweikl H, Spagnuolo G, Schmalz G. Genetic and cellular toxicology of dental resin monomers. J Dent Res 2006; 85: 870-7.
39. Vajrabhaya L, Korsuwannawong S, Bosl C, Schmalz G. The cytotoxicity of self-etching primer bonding agents in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 86-90.
40. Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, et al. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215-35.
41. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: A comparison of self-etching and etch-andrinse adhesive systems. Dental Mater 2009; 25: 1459-67.
42. Van Meerbeek B, Vargas S, Inoue S, et al. Adhesives and cements to promote preservation dentistry Oper Dent 2001; Supplement 6: 119-14.
43. Kanca JA. Improving bond strength through acid etching of dentin and bonding to wet dentin surfaces. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123: 35-43.
44. Kanca JA. Wet bonding: The effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 273-76.
45. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, Preston CD, Russell CM, Pashley DH. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res1996; 75: 1851-8.
46. Milia E, Lallai MR, Garcia-Godoy F. In vivo effect of a self etching primer on dentin. Am J Dent 1999; 4: 167-71.
47. Jacobsen T, Söderholm KJ. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995; 11: 132-6.
48. Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Homer JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Comparison of interfacial morphology and strength of bonds made to superficial and deep dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 8: 297-302.
49. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion J Dent 1997; 5: 355-72.
50. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 18-25.
51. Pioch T, Staehle HJ, Duschner H, Garcia-Godoy F. Nanoleakage at the composite-dentin interface: A review. Am J Dent 2001; 14: 252-58.
52. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Yoshiyama M. Two modes of nanoleakage expression in single-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 472-76, b.
53. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Water treeing-A potential mechanism for degradation of dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 6-12.
54. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J: Recent Advances in the Theory and Mechanism of Adhesive. Resin Bonding to Dentin: A Critical Review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2009; 88B: 558-78.
55. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Tay FR, Agee KA, Lee KW. Solvation of dried dentin matrix by water and other polar solvents. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 97-102.
56. Barton AFM. Handbook of solubility parameters and other cohesion parameters. CRC Press: Boca Raton, 1991; 69-156.
57. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J, Kerrigan J. Evaluation of biochemical interactions of self-etch dentin adhesive primer molecules with type 1 collagen: Computer modeling and in vitro binding analysis. Acta Biomaterialia 2007; 3: 705-14.
58. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 17-28.
59. Salz U, Mucke A, Zimmermann J, Tay FR, Pashley DH. pKa value and buffering capacity of acidic monomers commonly used in selfetching primers. J Adhes Dent 2006; 8: 143-150.
60. Castelli G, Gallottini L, Sotgiu G, Gallina G, Lumbau A, Milia E. Evaluation of the enamel etching pattern of self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater 2010; 26 Supplement 1, e4.
61. Pashley DH, Tay FR Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching adhesives. Part II: Etching effects on unground enamel Dent Mat 2001; 17: 430-44.
62. Milia E, Santini A. Ultrastructural transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study of hybrid layers formed beneath a one-bottle adhesive system using the total-etch technique and a self-etching system. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 447-52.
63. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, De Munck J et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 1160-4.
64. Salz U, Zimmermann J, Zeuner F, Moszner N. Hydrolytic stability of self-etching adhesive systems. J Adhes Dentistry 2005; 7: 107-16.
65. Hannig M, Bock H, Bott B, Hoth-Hannig W. Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 11: 464-70.
66. Perdigão J, Geraldeli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 32-42.
67. Sattabanasuk V, Shimada Y, Tagami J. The bond of resin to different dentin surface characteristics Oper Dent 2004; 29: 333-41.
68. Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effective bond strength of current adhesive systems on deciduous and permanent dentin Oper Dent 2004; 29: 196-202.
69. Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Nagaoka N, et al. Nano-controlled molecular interaction at adhesive interfaces for hard tissue reconstruction. Acta Biomater 2010; 6: 3573-82.
70. Waidyasekera K, Nikaido T., Weerasinghe DS, Ichinose S, Tagami J. Reinforcement of dentin in self-etch adhesive technology: A new concept J Dent 2009; 37: 604-9.
71. Inoue G, Nikaido T, Foxton RM, Tagami J. The acid-base resistant zone in three dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater J 2009; 28: 717-21.
72. Van Landuyt K, Cardoso M, De Munck J, et al. Optimization of the concentration of photo-iniziator in a one step self-etch adhesive. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 982-8.
73. Itthagarun A, Tay FR, Pashley DH, Wefel JS, Garcia-Godoy F, Wei SHY. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part III. Evidence from fluid conductance and artificial caries inhibition. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 394-400.
74. Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 350-4.
75. Yoshida E, Uno S, Nodasaka Y, Kaga M, Hirano S. Relationship between water status in dentin and interfacial morphology in all-inone adhesive. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 556-60.
76. Hashimoto M, Fujita S, Kaga M, Yawaka Y. Effect of water on bonding of one-bottle self-etching adhesives. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 172-8.
77. Ito S, Hashimoto M, Wadgaonkar B, et al. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on water sorption and changes in modulus of elasticity. Biomat 2005; 26: 6449-59.
78. Sauro S, Mannocci F, Toledano M, Osorio R, Thompsonand I, Watson TF. Influence of the hydrostatic pulpal pressure on droplets formation in current etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: A video rate/TSM microscopy and fluid filtration study. Dent Mater 2009; 25: 1392-402.
79. Tay FR, Pashley DH, Hiraishi N, et al. Tubular occlusion prevents water-treeing and though- and through fluid movement in a singlebottle, one-step self-etch adhesive model. J Dent Res 2005; 84: 891-6.
80. rd Ed. Méndez-Vilas & Díaz: Badajoz 2010; Vol 1, pp. 256-67.