Clinical evaluation of two packable resin-based composite restorations: A three-year report

General Dentistry

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 338-343

  Torres, Carlos Rocha Gomes ^a   Barges, Alessandra Buhler ^a   Goncalves, Sergio Eduardo Paiva ^a   Pucci, Cesar Rogerio ^a   De Araujo, Maria Amelia Maximo ^a   Barcellos, Daphne Camara ^b  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b Clinical Research Academic Group   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FILTEK P60 COMPOSITE RESIN; PRODIGY CONDENSABLE; RESIN;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL MARGINAL ADAPTATION; DENTAL RESTORATION WEAR; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTHESIS COLORING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77957963474     PISSN: 03636771     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Christensen GJ. Amalgam vs. composite resin: 1998. J Am Dent Assoc 1998;129(12):1757-1759.
2. Leinfelder KF, SluderTB, Sockwell CL, Strickland WD, Wall JT. Clinical evaluation of composite resins as anterior and posterior restorative materials.) Prosthet Dent 1975;33(4):407-416.
3. Leinfelder KF. New developments in resin restorative systems. J Am Dent Assoc 1997; 128( 5): 573-581.
4. Phillips RW, Avery DR, Metira R, Swartz ML, Mc-Cune RJ. Observations on a composite resin for Class II restorations: Two-year report. J Prosthet Dent 1972,28(2):164-169.
5. Barnes DM, Holston AM, Strassler HE, Shires PJ. Evaluation of clinical performance of twelve posterior composite resins with a standardized placement technique. J Esthet Dent 1990;2(2): 36-43.
6. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct posterior restoration: Clinical results and new developments. Dent Clin North Am 2002;46(2): 303-339.
7. Combe EC, Burke FJ. Contemporary resin-based composite materials for direct placement restorations: Packables, flowables and others. Dent Update 2000;27:326-336.
8. Leinfelder Kf, Bayne SC, Swift FJ Jr. Packable composites: Overview and technical considerations. J Esthet Dent 1999;11(5):234-239.
9. Choi KK, Ferracane JL, HiltonTL, Charlton D. Properties of packable dental composites. J Esthet Dent 2000;12(4):216-226.
10. Cobb DH, Macgregor KM, Vargas MA, Denehy GE. The physical properties of packable and conventional posterior resin-based composites: A comparison. J Am DentAssoc 2000; 131(11 )r 1610-1615.
11. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC,Crisp RJ, Wilson NHF. A practice-based, rancomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: One-year results. Oper Dent 2002; 27(5)423-429.
12. KiremitciA.AIpaslanT, Gurgan S. Six-year clinical evaluation of packable composite restorations. Oper Dent 2009;34(1):11-17.
13. Lopes LG, Cefaly DF, Franco EB, Mondelli RF, Lauris JR, Navarro MF Clinical evaluation of two "packable" posterior composite resins. Clin Ora Investig 2002;6(2):79-83.
14. Baratieri LN, RitterAV. Four-year clinical evaluation of posterior resin-based composite restorations placed using the total-etch technique, J Esthet Restor Dent 2001;13(1):50-57.
15. Ernst C, Martin M, Stuff S,Willershausen B. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for posterior teeth after 3 years. Clin Oral Invest 2001;5(3):148-155.
16. Turkun LS, Turkun M, Ozata F. Clinical performance of a packable resin composite for a period of 3 years. Quintessence Int 2005;36(5): 365-372
17. Poon EC, Smales RJ, Yip KH. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: Results at 3.5 years. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136(11): 1533-1540.
18. Can Say E, Kayahan B, Ozel E, Gokce K, Soyman M, Bayirli G. Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006;7(2):17-25.
19. Yip KH, Poon BK, Chu FC, Poon EC, Kong FY, Smales RJ. Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid resin-based composites for posterior restorations in permanent teeth Results at 12 months, J Am DentAssoc 2003; 134(12):1581-1589
20. Hayashi M, Wilson NH, Watts DC. Quality of marginal adaptation evaluation of posterior composites in clinical trials. J Dent Res 2003; 82(1):59-63.
21. WendtSLJr.ZiemiechiTL, Leinfelder KF. Proximal wear rates by tooth position of resin composite restorations. J Dent 1995;24(1-2):33-39