Inter-crystallite nanoretention of self-etching adhesives at enamel imaged by transmission electron microscopy

European journal of oral sciences

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 464-470

  Hannig, Matthias ^a   Bock, Henning ^b   Bott, Burkard ^b   Hoth Hannig, Wiebke ^c  

^a SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; ALCOHOL; CLEARFIL LINER BOND 2; CLEARFIL SE BOND; ETCH′ HELIOBOND; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; PYROPHOSPHATE; RESIN CEMENT; RESULCIN AQUAPRIME;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL ACID ETCHING; DENTAL BONDING; ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; ENAMEL; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; TOOTH PERMEABILITY; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ACID ETCHING, DENTAL; ACRYLATES; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL ENAMEL PERMEABILITY; DIPHOSPHATES; ETHANOL; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON; RESIN CEMENTS;

EID: 0036885702     PISSN: 09098836     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21326.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. 1 Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955 ; 34: 849– 853.
2. 2 Buonocore MG, Matsui A, Gwinnett AJ. Penetration of resin dental materials into enamel surfaces with reference to bonding. Arch Oral Biol 1968 ; 13: 61– 70.
3. 3 Gwinnett AJ, Matsui A. A study of enamel adhesives. The physical relationship between enamel and adhesive. Arch Oral Biol 1967 ; 12: 1615– 1620.
4. 4 Barkmeier WW, Shaffer SE, Gwinnett AJ. Effects of 15 vs 60 second enamel acid conditioning on adhesion and morphology. Oper Dent 1986 ; 11: 111– 116.
5. 5 Kanca J. One step bond strength to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 1997 ; 9: 5– 8.
6. 6 Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999 ; 27: 523– 530.
7. 7 Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by phenyl‐P self etching primer. J Dent Res 1994 ; 73: 1212– 1220.
8. 8 Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self‐etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 1998 ; 14: 99– 105.
9. 9 Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self‐etching primer vs phosphoric acid–an alternative concept for composite‐to‐enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999 ; 24: 172– 180.
10. 10 Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P, Leitao J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of a self‐etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997 ; 10: 141– 146.
11. 11 Itou K, Torii Y, Takimura T, Chikami K, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of priming time on tensile bond strength to bovine teeth and morphologic structure of interfaces created by self‐etching primers. Int J Prosthodont 2001 ; 14: 225– 230.
12. 12 Miyazaki M, Sato M, Onose H. Durability of enamel bond strength of simplified bonding systems. Oper Dent 2000 ; 25: 75– 80.
13. 13 Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Sinhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophilic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 1999 ; 12: 181– 184.
14. 14 Miyazaki M, Hirohata N, Takagaki K, Onose H, Moore BK. Influence of self‐etching primer drying time on enamel bond strength of resin composites. J Dent 1999 ; 27: 203– 207.
15. 15 Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D. Regional bond strengths of self‐etching/self‐priming adhesive systems. J Dent 1998 ; 26: 609– 616.
16. 16 Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT. Bond strengths and SEM‐evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 1995 ; 8: 289– 293.
17. 17 Nikaido T, Nakajima M, Higashi T, Kanemura N, Pereira P, Tagami J. Shear bond strength of a single‐step bonding system to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater J 1997 ; 16: 40– 47.
18. 18 Shono Y, Terashita M, Pashley EL, Brewer PD, Pashley DH. Effects of cross‐sectional area on resin‐to‐enamel tensile bond strength. Dent Mater 1997 ; 13: 290– 296.
19. 19 Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of Dental Hard Tissue. Tokyo: Quintessence Publishing, 1998, 6– 7.
20. 20 Pashley DH, Tay FR. Aggressiveness of contemporary self‐etching adhesives. Part II. etching effects on unground enamel. Dent Mater 2001 ; 17: 430– 444.
21. 21 Nygaard VK, Simmelink JW. Ultrastructural study of the resin infiltration zone in acid‐treated human enamel. Arch Oral Biol 1978 ; 23: 1151– 1156.
22. 22 Johnson NW. Differences in the shape of human enamel crystallites after partial destruction by caries, EDTA, and various acids. Arch Oral Biol 1966 ; 11: 1421– 1424.
23. 23 Frazier PD. Adult human enamel: an electron microscopic study of crystallite size and morphology. J Ultrastruct Res 1968 ; 22: 1– 11.
24. 24 Sharpe AN. Influence of the crystal orientation in human enamel on its reactivity to acid as shown by high resolution microradiography. Archs Oral Biol 1967 ; 12: 583– 591.
25. 25 Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Adhesion mechanism of self‐etching adhesives. In: Tagami J, Toledano M, Prati C, eds. Advanced adhesive dentistry. Osaka: Kuraray Co. Ltd, 2000, 131– 148.
26. 26 Toledano M, Osorio T, De Leonardi G, Rosales‐Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo‐Vilchez MA. Influence of self‐etching primers on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2001 ; 14: 205– 210.
27. 27 Shinchi MJ, Soma K, Nakabayashi N. The effect of phosphoric acid concentration on resin tag length and bond strength of a photo‐cured resin to acid‐etched enamel. Dent Mater 2000 ; 16: 324– 329.