In vitro evaluation of microleakage of class II packable composite resin restorations using flowable composite and resin modified glass ionomers as intermediate layers

Journal of Conservative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 414-417

  Majety, Kishore Kumar ^a   Pujar, Madhu ^b  

^a KLE VK INSTITUTE OF DENTAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b Maratha Mandal Dental College   (India)

Author keywords

Flowable resin composite; intermediate layers; marginal microleakage; packable composite; resin modified glass ionomer

Indexed keywords

EID: 81855221167     PISSN: 09720707     EISSN: 09745203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.87215     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Mjor IA. The location of clinically diagnosed secondary caries. Quintessence Int 1998;29:313-7.
2. Hagge MS, Lindemuth JS, Mason JF, Simon JF. Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations. Gen Dent 2001;49:489-95.
3. Leevailoj C, Cochran MA, Matis BA, Moore BK, Platt JA. Microleakage of posterior packable resin composites with and without flowable liners. Oper Dent 2001;26:302-7.
4. Neme AM, Maxson BB, Pink FE, Aksu MN. Microleakage of Class II packable resin composites lined with flowables: An in vitro study. Oper Dent 2002;27:600-5.
5. Payne JH 4th. The marginal seal of Class II restorations: Flowable composite resin compared to injectable glass ionomer. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1999;23:123-30.
6. KempScholte - Davidson. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restoration effected by increased flexibility. J Dent Res 1990; 69:1240-1243.
7. Mount GJ. Glass ionomer cements: Past, present, future. Oper Dent 1994;19:82-90.
8. Van Dijken JW, Kieri C, Carlen M. Longevity of extensive class II opensandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement. J Dent Res 1999;78:1319-25.
9. Chuang SF, Jin YT, Liu JK, Chang CH, Shieh DB. Influence of flowable composite lining thickness on Class II composite restorations. Oper Dent 2004;29:301-8.
10. Chuang SF, Liu JK, Chao CC, Liao FP, Chen YH. Effects of flowable composite lining and operator experience on microleakage and internal voids in class II composite restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:177-83.
11. Tredwin CJ, Stokes A, Moles DR. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Oper Dent 2005;30:32-8.
12. Loguercio AD, de Oliveira Bauer JR, Reis A, Grande RH. In vitro microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations. Quintessence Int 2004;35:29-34.
13. Alonso RC, Cunha LG, Correr GM, De Goes MF, Correr-Sobrinho L, Puppin-Rontani RM, et al. Association of photoactivation methods and low modulus liners on marginal adaptation of composite restorations. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62:298-304.
14. Benzos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001;26:60-9.
15. Aboushala A, Kugel G, Hurley E. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: Microleakage studies. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1996;21:67-70.
16. Crim GA, Chapman KW. Reducing microleakage in Class II restorations: An in vitro study. Quintessence Int 1994;25:781-5.