Investigation of mechanical properties of experimental Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental composite resins containing various mass fractions of silica nanoparticles

Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 112-117

  Hosseinalipour, Mohammad ^a   Javadpour, Jafar ^a   Rezaie, Hamidreza ^a   Dadras, Taimaz ^a   Hayati, Amir Nemati ^a  

^a IRAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

methacryloxy propyl trimethoxy silane; Flexural strength; Fracture toughness; Vickers microhardness; Visible light curing

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHACRYLOXYPROPYLTRIMETHOXYSILANE; NANOPARTICLE; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; SILANE DERIVATIVE; SILICON DIOXIDE; TRIETHYLENE GLYCOL DIMETHACRYLATE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; PARTICLE SIZE; PLIABILITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; NANOPARTICLES; PARTICLE SIZE; PLIABILITY; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; SILANES; SILICON DIOXIDE;

EID: 77954351317     PISSN: 1059941X     EISSN: 1532849X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00530.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bowen RL. Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1963, 66:57-64.
2. Bowen RL, Marjenhoff WA. Dental composites/glass ionomer: the materials. Adv Dent Res 1992, 6:44-49.
3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA, Bis-GMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Mater 1998, 14:51-56.
4. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M. A classification of dental composites according to their morphological and mechanical characteristics. Dent Mater 1992, 8:310-319.
5. Phillips RW. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials (ed 9) 1991, Philadelphia, Saunders
6. Lu H, Roeder LB, Lei L. Effect of surface roughness on stain resistance of dental resin composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005, 17:102-109.
7. Baseren M. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures. J Biomater Appl 2004, 19:121-134.
8. Taylor DF, Kalachandra S, Sankarapandian M. Relationship between filler and matrix resin characteristics and the properties of uncured composite pastes. Biomaterials 1998, 19:197-204.
9. Chung CM, Kim JG, Kim MS. Development of a new photocurable composite resin with reduced curing shrinkage. Dent Mater 2002, 18:174-178.
10. Atai M, Nekoomanesh M, Hashemi SA. Physical and mechanical properties of an experimental dental composite based on a new monomer. Dent Mater 2004, 20:663-668.
11. Lu H, Stansbury JW, Nie J. Development of highly reactive mono-(meth) acrylates as reactive diluents for dimethacrylate-based dental resin systems. Biomaterials 2005, 26:1329-1336.
12. Ikejima I, Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Shear punch strength and flexural strength of model composites with varying filler volume fraction, particle size and silanation. Dent Mater 2003, 19:206-211.
13. Ruddell DE, Maloney MM, Thompson JY. Effect of novel filler particles on the mechanical and wear properties of dental composites. Dent Mater 2002, 18:72-80.
14. Xu HH, Quinn JB, Smith DT. Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskers-effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties. Biomaterials 2002, 23:735-742.
15. Lawn BR. Fracture of Brittle Solids 1993, London, Cambridge University Press
16. Kirk RE, Othmer DF, Kroschwitz J. Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology (ed 4) 1991, 397. New York, Wiley, p.
17. Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental composites. Int J Nanotechnol 2004, 1:130-156.
18. Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001, 26:535-576.
19. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003, 134:1382-1390.
20. Terry DA. Direct applications of a nanocomposites resin system. Part 1. The evolution of contemporary composite materials. Pract Proc Aesthetic Dent 2004, 16:417-422.
21. Zandinejad AA, Atai M, Pahlevan A. The effect of ceramic and porous fillers on the mechanical properties of experimental dental composites. Dent Mater 2006, 22:382-387.
22. ISO 4049, Dentistry-Polymer-Based Filling, Restorative and Luting Materials 2000, 15-18. International Standard Organization, ed 3, Geneva, ISO, pp
23. Sabbagh J. Physical and Mechanical Characterization of Resin-Based Materials. 2004, PhD Thesis, Belgium
24. Manhart J, Chen H, Hamm G. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent 2004, 29:481-508.
25. Loughran GM, Versluis A, Douglas WH. Evaluation of sub-critical fatigue crack propagation in a restorative composite. Dent Mater 2005, 21:252-261.
26. Della Bona A, Anusavice KJ, DeHoff PH. Weibull analysis and flexural strength of hot-pressed core and veneered ceramic structures. Dent Mater 2003, 19:662-669.
27. Tanimoto Y, Nishiwaki T, Nemoto K. Effect of filler content on bending properties of dental composites: numerical simulation with the use of the finite-element method. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004, 71B:188-195.
28. Mota EG, Oshima HM, Burnett LH. Evaluation of diametral tensile strength and Knoop microhardness of five nanofilled composites in dentin and enamel shades. Stomatologija 2006, 8:67-69.
29. Wilson KS, Zhang K, Antonucci JM. Systematic variation of interfacial phase reactivity in dental nanocomposites. Biomaterials 2005, 26:5095-5103.
30. Neves AD, Discacciati JAC, Oréfice RL. Correlation between degree of conversion, microhardness and inorganic content in composites. Braz Oral Res 2002, 16:349-354.