How to assess team performance in terms of control: A protocol based on cognitive systems engineering

Cognition, Technology and Work

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 337-353

  Palmqvist, Hanna ^a   Bergström, Johan ^a   Henriqson, Eder ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Assessment; COCOM; Control; Crisis management; Team performance

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT; COCOM; CONTROL MODEL; CONTROL MODES; CRISIS MANAGEMENT; LOSS OF CONTROL; PILOT STUDIES; TEAM PERFORMANCE; TIME INTERVAL;

CONTROL; SURVEYS; SYSTEMS ENGINEERING;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

EID: 84867706973     PISSN: 14355558     EISSN: 14355566     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10111-011-0183-6     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Ashby (1959) Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica 1: 83-99.
2. Baker DP, Dismukes RK (2002) A framework for understanding crew performance assessment issues. Int J Aviat Psychol 12(3): 205-222.
3. Baker D, Mulqueen C, Dismukes R (2001) Training raters to assess resource management skills. In: Salas E, Bowers C, Edens E (eds) Improving teamwork in organisations: applications of resource management training. Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 131-145.
4. Catchpole KR, Mischra A, Handa A, McCulloch P (2008a) Teamwork and error in the operating room: analysis of skills and roles. Ann Surg A mon Rev Surg Sci Pract 247(4): 699-706.
5. Catchpole KR, Giddings AEB, Hirst G, Dale T, Peek GJ, de Leval MR (2008b) A method for measuring threats and errors in surgery. Cogn Technol Work 10(4): 295-304.
6. English A, Griffith R, Steelman L (2004) Team performance: the effect of team conscientiousness and task type. Small Group Res 35(6): 643-665.
7. Fletcher G et al (2004) Rating non-technical skills: developing a behavioural marker system for use in anaesthesia. Cogn Tech Work 6: 165-171.
8. Flin R, Martin L (2001) Behavioural markers for crew resource management: a survey of current practice. Int J Aviat Psychol 11: 95-118.
9. Hanashiro D, Queiroz R (2005) O efeito da diversidade no desempenho dos times de trabalho: um trade-off entre homogeneidade e heterogeneidade? In: ENANPAD XXIX. Anais do XXIX ENANPAD. Brasilia, DF: ANPAD 2005.
10. Helmreich RL, Klinect JR, Wilhelm JA (1999) Models of threat, error, and CRM in flight operations. In: Proceedings of the tenth international symposium on aviation psychology, Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University, pp 677-682 (UTHFRP Pub240).
11. Helmreich RL, Merritt AC, Wilhelm JA (1999b) The evolution of crew resource management training in commercial aviation. Int J Aviat Psyhol 9(1): 19-32.
12. Henriqson E, Sauin TA, Bergström J (2010) Coordination as a situated and distributed phenomena. Aviat Focus 1(1): 58-76.
13. Hollnagel E (1993a) Human reliability analysis: context and control. Academic Press, London.
14. Hollnagel E (1993b) The modelling of loss of control. International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1993. 'Systems Engineering in the Service of Humans', Conference Proceedings vol. 3, pp 44-49.
15. Hollnagel E (1998) Context, cognition, and control. In: Waern Y (ed) Co-operative in process management: cognition and information technology. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 27-51.
16. Hollnagel E (2002) Time and time again. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3(2): 143-158.
17. Hollnagel E, Woods DD (1983) Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. Int J Man Mach Stud 18: 583-600.
18. Hollnagel E, Woods DD (2005) Joint cognitive systems: foundations of cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Hutchins E (1995a) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Camebridge, MA.
20. Hutchins E (1995b) How a cockpit remembers its speeds. Cogn Sci 19: 265-288.
21. Jordan M, Field H, Armenakis A (2002) The relationship of group process variables and team performance: a team-level analysis in a field setting. Small Group Res 33(1): 121-150.
22. Klein G, Feltovich PJ, Bradshaw JM, Woods DD (2005) Common ground and coordination in joint activity. In: Rouse W, Boff K (eds) Organizational simulation. Wiley, New York, pp 139-184.
23. Letsky M, Warner N, Fiore SM, Smith C (eds) (2008) Macrocognition in teams: theories and methodologies. Ashgate Publishers, London.
24. Leva MC, Cahill J, Kay AM (2010) The advancement of a new human factors report-'The Unique Report'-facilitating flight crew auditing of performance/operations as part of an airline's safety management system. Ergonomics 53(2): 164-184.
25. Neisser U (1976) Cognition and reality. WH Freeman, San Fransisco.
26. Salas E, Fiore SM (eds) (2004) Team cognition: understanding the factors that drive process and performance. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
27. Salas E, Wilson KA, Burke CS, Wightman D (2006) Do crew resource management training work? An update, an extension and some critical needs. Hum Factors 48(2): 303-321.
28. Salas E, DiazGranados D, Klein C, Burke CS, Stagl Kevin C, Goodwin Gerald F, Halpin Stanley M (2008) Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Hum Factors 50(6): 903-933.
29. Svensson S (2007) Commanding staffs and staff work in crisis, risks and accidents (Staber och stabsarbete vid kriser, risker och olyckor). Studentlitteratur, Lund.
30. Van-Avermaete JAG, Kruijsen EAC (eds) (1998) NOTECHS. The evaluation of non-technical skills of multi-pilot aircrew in relation to the JAR-FCL requirements. EC NOTECHS project final report: NLR-CR-98443, Amsterdam.
31. Wojter (2009) Functional modeling of constraint management in aviation safety and command and control. Dissertation No 1247, Linköping University.
32. Woods DD, Hollnagel E (2006) Joint cognitive systems: patterns in cognitive systems engineering. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.